Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin Blue Formally Opposes Qantas, Air NZ Tie-Up

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Blue Formally Opposes Qantas, Air NZ Tie-Up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2003, 23:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aust
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Frank, I can't follow your GST argument. The ALP haven't had the GST as policy since the early 80s when Bob Ork canned it, primarily due to polling concerns. The ALP won the unwinnable election in 93 by running against it. They ran against it in 99. Howard ran for it. I think its pretty black and white which party stood for the GST.

Whether or not QF has a monopoly in Oz (which they don't) means stuff all on the world stage. I believe Dixon's point is that if QF is to compete globally then they must have no restrictions on their ability to raise capital globally.

The ACCC is hardly a toothless tiger. Ask Mayne or any other company that has gone through the ringer with Fells et al. Ask most people in business what they think about the ACCC and you'll get a fairly animated response. If the ACCC was business friendly would the ACCI openly campaign against it?

Whatever conspiracy theories you have about Howard, the fact remains that he didn't back Dixon's call. If he was in bed with QF he would have.
bitter balance is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2003, 23:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come off it, conspiracy theory? just take a look at the guy and what he's done and the advice he's got from who and attitude of the idiot towards Australian people. The guy is an embarrasment around the world. And it is a well known fact in Canberra as to how far up the coight he is with Not only Dixon, but I believe Margaret Jackson as well.

There is enough evidence around on the guys ways and means. All you have to do is ask staff in his own department.


I'm not having a go directly at you Bitter Balance, but the guy is there by default.
frank Borman is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2003, 23:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aust
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Frank, well you need to give me some names to talk to then. Mostly the only people I hear the QF stuff from is ex AN staff who think Howard should have saved the company. My point is, I don't care whether you think he has his head up anyone's arse, his actions do not support the view that he is in bed with QF. It doesn't really matter what side of politics you are on, or whether you think Howard is an idiot etc.
bitter balance is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2003, 22:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats understandable from the ex AN staff. His entire actions publically probably don't give weight to his collusion, but why don't you ask Max Moore-Wilton. I think in the public service they have to keep memo's etc for a period of 7 years. Stuff is attainable under the freedom of info act.

The department of PM and C is the melting pot for the governemts decisions. thtas where it's all kept.

A good investigative journo would do well in getting the required stuff. in particular about the meeting/dinner at the lobby in Canberra one fatefull night mid 2001 with Max Moore-Wilton, QF staff and Howard henchmen.
frank Borman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.