Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Impulse Expansion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2003, 13:05
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: tatooine
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

All I can say is that there are quite a few sweating on a Brisbane base and are hoping that expansion would mean that it would open as a base
I hope none of the redundant guy's are reading this. Jeeze they would be p!ssed off to know there fellow work mates are sweating on an expansion for a base change.
anakin is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2003, 22:18
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mppgf, gee, what did I say, a little bit of misinterpretation goes a long way. Oh well, least I won't continue this laughable defenciveness by personal attack like you and the others do. Your obviously the expert here on all things AD and regulatory wise so it's over to you to point out to everyone the real case.

frank Borman is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 02:03
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What did I say ?
Well Franky thats the stuff between the Quotation marks "......".
There is no misinterpretation.You painted yourself as the expert,all I have stated is that I know the facts regarding the 717.
I am unaware of "many problems" with the aircraft which would warrant AD's serious enough to shut down production.
So as I pointed out in my last post, your demand for specific details is turned right back at you.
The whole point of my objection to your posting rubbish, is the fact that there is no CASE.
As pointed out by FluffyBunnyFeet (I do love that user name). The problem with the EEC appears to have been isolated and software due out in March will hopefully solve this problem once and for all.
Anakin, I really don't think any of the redundant guy's or gal's would hold it against any of the crew lucky enough to have a flying job on the 717 currently, to have hopes of returning to a base that they were kicked out of a year ago.
Expansion would mean positions for these guy's and gals and I'm sure that is all that concerns them regarding the situation at this time.
I look forward to seeing them crewing the 717 in the near future and the Southerns 146 crews as I understand their positions at NJS are not permanent.


Last edited by mppgf; 27th Jan 2003 at 03:17.
mppgf is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 04:11
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: tatooine
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, Ok then I forgot how you know what those guy's are thinking and all.

Last edited by anakin; 27th Jan 2003 at 04:25.
anakin is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 04:37
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
anakin,

This is becoming very interesting. Not that I should know but I was unaware that Pilots were layed off 'out' of seniority. I hope another Qantaslink company can help you guys and girls out.

Can I assume 'Impulse Cadets' with considerably less experience were promoted onto the 717?

Poor form Impulse / Airconnex whatever.....
hoss is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 07:43
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: tatooine
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes true hoss. Pilots were layed off out of order of seniority. Cadets were not to blame, It was the 1900 guy's that were told you must go because your only 1900. The 717 guy's employed after you as direct entry will stay on because they are more valueable.
But don't let me influence you as mppfg said (and he works there so he would know)they should be happy with those guy's right? Especially because seniority is so important now!!!

Last edited by anakin; 27th Jan 2003 at 10:30.
anakin is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 10:30
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's a pretty safe assumption to say that their major concern at the moment is securing a position on the 717.
While I totally disagree with the way the 1900 pilot's have been treated I don't believe every 717 crew member should have no other thought on their mind beside when the unfortunate redundant pilot's will be re-employed.
I said nothing about anybody having to be happy with the situation.Blaming the direct entry 717 crew members is ridiculous as they had no say in the matter at all.Just as the pilot's made redundant had no say.
Yes ! In my opinion seniority should be the RULE.
mppgf is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 12:05
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The dark corner of the bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Too all of our redundant guys. You have not been forgotten. There are people batting for you. Hang in there. Look forward to seeing you on the line.

DM.
Douglas Mcdonnell is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 23:37
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vic
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's true that no 'out-of-seniority' laying off was done, at least to my knowledge. I can also understand the guys on the wrong side of that coin feeling miffed, but life does go on and issues other than their immediate employment concerns need to be addressed also. Their turn will come eventually, and hopefully it'll be a better workplace as a result.

Any anger should be addressed at the lamentable communication that continues to prevail ('tho this should be familiar to all) and the manufacturer of these tempramental EEC's who are probably the ultimate reason why further expansion has not already occurred... Until this issue is solved I wouldn't expect any good news.
FluffyBunnyFeet is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2003, 04:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Congratulations Matt Fikkers.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2003, 10:03
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Um, What the Fik did he do ?
mppgf is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2003, 20:50
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Back flying

He'll be in the sim in about 3 weeks. Flying shortly after.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2003, 22:53
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2daddies,
yes he's the one I'm writing about. I don't know the reason why more haven't gone that way.

I suspect that one reason might be that not all the redundant crew have expressed a desire to work for Eastern, which is fair enough. However, if they were interested they had to go through staffcv at the time as there was no automatic notification (maybe there should have been). Perhaps they weren't aware of that?

From memory, around 10 of the total number have been interviewed. Those that have, were given priority processing over other applicants back then.

It's not too late for the remainder to throw a hat in the ring if they haven't already. 2 days of interviews in Feb.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 03:24
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: tatooine
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blaming the direct entry 717 crew members is ridiculous as they had no say in the matter at all.
I wonder if any of those guy's voiced their opinion then when the lay off's were occuring? They probably were not endorsing seniority then. Just a question, Had the EBA been ratified at that time and is that the reason seniority was not implemented for the lay off's. OR, was it just an isolated case (like when the VQ check and trainers hit up for a pay rise only to be approved if it was supplemented from the F/O's wage. So naturally they stuck there hands in their f/O's pocket. And they got their important pay rise)

Just a question that's all.
anakin is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 03:50
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: We shall see what we shall see
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anakin

The EBA was ratified at the time and it gave them the thumbs up to do what they did. Had nothing to do with direct entries. Even if they had put their hands up the company wasn't going to throw $80 000 away with each one.

BMC
ByMyCalculation is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 10:16
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anakin, In answer to your question.
I seriously doubt anybody in their position anywhere and in any job would put their hand up and as BMC said, it would have made no difference.
Your reference to check and trainers is incorrect.
People who were involved will tell you the pay rise issue was to do with captains getting a pay rise and yes it was at the expense of the first officers.It was supposed to be voted on by said captains but never was.
Rather it was pushed through by a person in power at the time.
mppgf is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 21:55
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting back to the original topic of this thread - Impulse expansion, has anyone heard of any truth to the rumours of a possible Perth base. I know of a certain senior manager been seen over there recently and plenty of gossip around the traps, but nothing hard and fast...
VQ purser is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2003, 23:27
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congratulations to Matt. Hopefully now we'll see more of the redundant guys/ girl gain positions elsewhere in the Qantas group while the wait for the 717 continues.

Thanks for the words, Douglas. I look forward to it too.
2daddies is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2003, 02:38
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard whispers of PER-ADL services (from a VQ pilot I spoke with). But that was no more than whispers.

On the YSSY board there is comment that 717s might be used on some SYD-CBR services. I find this doubtful however given the lack of business class.
apacau is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.