Virgin Blue Pacific
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin Blue Pacific
Could it be that there are 3 767-300's on the ground over N America way all sporting Virgin Blue
livery?
It seems a passenger who had flown from Vancouver connecting with a DJ flight in Sydney saw these Beauties with her very own eyes.
Does anyone care to confirm/deny?
livery?
It seems a passenger who had flown from Vancouver connecting with a DJ flight in Sydney saw these Beauties with her very own eyes.
Does anyone care to confirm/deny?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SnI,
Not wanting to start anything here by any means, but this 'passenger', does she know the difference between Boeings? Could of it been 737's that she saw? Just curious. I'm led to believe if/when "Pacific" gets up and running, a revised livery would be applied anyway.
Not wanting to start anything here by any means, but this 'passenger', does she know the difference between Boeings? Could of it been 737's that she saw? Just curious. I'm led to believe if/when "Pacific" gets up and running, a revised livery would be applied anyway.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the second time Vancouver has come up in relation to Virgin Blue... Very interesting....
I'd like to know more.
However 767-300 surprises me. You sure it wasn't 737-300s or even 737-700s?
I'd like to know more.
However 767-300 surprises me. You sure it wasn't 737-300s or even 737-700s?
dj has three more HGW -700s on order for delivery in the next couple of months so i suspect it may have been these aircraft that our "spotter" saw, 767-300s for dj? i think not, this would go against all that dj stands for, quick turnarounds and high frequency services especially, i believe when dj does go intl that the '73 will be the aircraft of choice....
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: sydney
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quick, thirty minute turnarounds and high frequency are not the highest priority of medium-haul tourist class airlines.
Lots of bums on seats and an aircraft that can take lots of palletised freight is much more important i.e. the 767-200/300 is better suited than a 737 with manual 'chuck the bags in' cargo hold and a relatively small amount of seats....Seems to be working just fine for the Ochra folk at Australian Airlines
Lots of bums on seats and an aircraft that can take lots of palletised freight is much more important i.e. the 767-200/300 is better suited than a 737 with manual 'chuck the bags in' cargo hold and a relatively small amount of seats....Seems to be working just fine for the Ochra folk at Australian Airlines
yes, good point, though the 737-700/800 would be ideal out of east coast ports to pacific destinations for dj, they haven't even decided where they are flying too yet and will probably not happen till 3rd quarter of this year at the earliest, why would they have 3 767's painted up sitting in Vancouver???? i don't think these aircraft are 767's....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T53C
It's quite possible the passenger may not know the difference between a 76 and a 73.
However in terms of livery, the aircraft was described to look identical to Virgin Blue with Pacific
emblazoned on it...
After reading the last reply, I'm looking forward to the announcement date...
It's quite possible the passenger may not know the difference between a 76 and a 73.
However in terms of livery, the aircraft was described to look identical to Virgin Blue with Pacific
emblazoned on it...
After reading the last reply, I'm looking forward to the announcement date...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If there is an announcement soon, it's been a long time coming. I thought the second coming of the Lord might have happened sooner actually. Godfrey has been a little quiet lately. Maybe VB or VP are going to launch the 737-900X??? 
Steal QF's thunder.
Steal QF's thunder.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ebye
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even DJ should know that bilateral treaties dictate traffic rights for international & regional services.
Interestingly enough they wrote to regional Pacific countries asking if they wanted DJ to fly into their own back yard - and at whose expense. Their own national carrier would be the first to feel the effects of DJ’s arrival.
They should be checking with the DoT&RS/IASC in Canberra to see where open skies agreements are in place (USA & SIN) &/or what shelf capacity is available for their use.
Interestingly enough they wrote to regional Pacific countries asking if they wanted DJ to fly into their own back yard - and at whose expense. Their own national carrier would be the first to feel the effects of DJ’s arrival.
They should be checking with the DoT&RS/IASC in Canberra to see where open skies agreements are in place (USA & SIN) &/or what shelf capacity is available for their use.
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Qld
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if VB want to go to Singapore and Hong Kong, they're going to need something bigger than the 737. A 767 or 757 would be ideal!
As for the -900, one of the problems being encountered is that it's still single aisle and with more pax than the 800 it obviously increases turnaround times with the unloading and loading of pax. If the 2nd fwd door was utilised it then hardly beats the 800 for capacity, and the 800 also has greater range anyway! Not the ideal aircraft for domestic ops when compared with the 800!
As for the -900, one of the problems being encountered is that it's still single aisle and with more pax than the 800 it obviously increases turnaround times with the unloading and loading of pax. If the 2nd fwd door was utilised it then hardly beats the 800 for capacity, and the 800 also has greater range anyway! Not the ideal aircraft for domestic ops when compared with the 800!
and I wouldn't like to do that. 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on Air Support, you tease. Tell us something. We wont tell anyone
Check out the company's register and find that Pacific Blue Airlines has just been registered with HQ in Brisbane.
Interesting times ahead.
Check out the company's register and find that Pacific Blue Airlines has just been registered with HQ in Brisbane.
Interesting times ahead.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HGW yep can confirm Pacific Blue is looking very promising!!!! They don't want Virgin in the name....
Airsupport.... u know what I know Fleet announcement very very soon and 1st INTL destination...
clue: lets say you can get there with a 737 from the east-coast....
CASA Proposal currently being written!
ETOPS proposal already complete and presented to CASA!!
Airsupport.... u know what I know
Fleet announcement very very soon and 1st INTL destination... clue: lets say you can get there with a 737 from the east-coast....
CASA Proposal currently being written!
ETOPS proposal already complete and presented to CASA!!
