Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Subsidiary Crewing Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd May 2024, 22:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 604
Received 339 Likes on 120 Posts
Subsidiary Crewing Issues

I’m hearing Network Aviation are offering $4,005 pre tax payments to its Pilots every 3 months to try and stop them leaving. Have also started employing Toowoomba cadets.

NJS will be trying to add 50% more crew over the next 5 years paying the lowest base salary to any A220 Pilot world-wide. I’d imagine cadets will be on the way there as GA Pilots won’t touch this company anymore.

With these businesses running core domestic routes for Qantas this is not a good position to be in!

Last edited by aussieflyboy; 24th May 2024 at 01:46.
aussieflyboy is offline  
The following users liked this post:

Top Answer

23rd May 2024, 23:47
Slippery_Pete
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 493
Received 398 Likes on 73 Posts
I think NAA are done. I give it 12-18 months. 200 pilots with 2+ leaving per week isn’t going to last long.

You can’t just dump hundreds of cadets in there, because the check and trainers are leaving too. Plus, ramp up cadet-straight-to-jet-transport-control-seat too quickly and you’ll end up with a prang on your hands. CASA will need to watch it all very closely.

Bonza didn’t go out with a whimper, they failed spectacularly with incredible debts. Rex are teetering and continuing to bleed cash. NAA have the most pissed off pilots in the country and they’re pouring out the door. NJS pilots are similarly disenchanted with how they were treated during negotiations and they’re all refusing to bid to the A220. They’re going to have 29 brand new jets with zero pilots. And the ones who did go across and got a free endorsement and are already leaving.

Unfortunately, it’s all beyond repair now. Even if NAA were to cancel the determination and offer a significantly better deal (+30%), the damage is done.

Going to be some pretty hard conversations behind closed doors at Mascot with a please explain for one head of IR and former union president. So smug and proud of himself sipping Grange in the lounge, but has really created untold problems for the group into the future.

There’s a significant chunk of NAA pilots in the internal hold, and they’re leaving for the Middle East because mainline won’t give them a start date. Internal holds used to allow Qantas to trap and keep people - now it’s just doing the opposite and forcing them overseas. If Qantas want to shore up pilot supply, they need to give the NAA hold file pilots a start ASAP before they head off to the sandpit.

Mods need to be aware of deliberate and calculated sabotaging of threads by management. They happily came along to the previous NAA thread and pushed their fear campaigns to get yes votes, but then when they decide they want the whole thread shut down they resort to personal attacks knowing the mods will have to close it. It’s a way for them to control narrative. Perhaps rather than close the whole thread which is want they are wanting, just delete the post and sin-bin the offender?

I’m sure sameold will be along shortly trying to get this one shut down too.
Old 23rd May 2024, 23:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QLD
Posts: 592
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Think you will find another company in the South Pacific paying less for A220 pilots
geeup is offline  
Old 23rd May 2024, 23:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
qantas in general including mainline payes new staff the least in the industry. This includes all departments, only the misty eyed newbies blinded by the brand power of the red tail continue lining up to be paid barely above minimum wage, even menzie's and dnata pays there customer service staff better and gives them better rosters
unobtanium is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd May 2024, 23:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 493
Received 398 Likes on 73 Posts
I think NAA are done. I give it 12-18 months. 200 pilots with 2+ leaving per week isn’t going to last long.

You can’t just dump hundreds of cadets in there, because the check and trainers are leaving too. Plus, ramp up cadet-straight-to-jet-transport-control-seat too quickly and you’ll end up with a prang on your hands. CASA will need to watch it all very closely.

Bonza didn’t go out with a whimper, they failed spectacularly with incredible debts. Rex are teetering and continuing to bleed cash. NAA have the most pissed off pilots in the country and they’re pouring out the door. NJS pilots are similarly disenchanted with how they were treated during negotiations and they’re all refusing to bid to the A220. They’re going to have 29 brand new jets with zero pilots. And the ones who did go across and got a free endorsement and are already leaving.

Unfortunately, it’s all beyond repair now. Even if NAA were to cancel the determination and offer a significantly better deal (+30%), the damage is done.

Going to be some pretty hard conversations behind closed doors at Mascot with a please explain for one head of IR and former union president. So smug and proud of himself sipping Grange in the lounge, but has really created untold problems for the group into the future.

There’s a significant chunk of NAA pilots in the internal hold, and they’re leaving for the Middle East because mainline won’t give them a start date. Internal holds used to allow Qantas to trap and keep people - now it’s just doing the opposite and forcing them overseas. If Qantas want to shore up pilot supply, they need to give the NAA hold file pilots a start ASAP before they head off to the sandpit.

Mods need to be aware of deliberate and calculated sabotaging of threads by management. They happily came along to the previous NAA thread and pushed their fear campaigns to get yes votes, but then when they decide they want the whole thread shut down they resort to personal attacks knowing the mods will have to close it. It’s a way for them to control narrative. Perhaps rather than close the whole thread which is want they are wanting, just delete the post and sin-bin the offender?

I’m sure sameold will be along shortly trying to get this one shut down too.
Slippery_Pete is offline  
Old 23rd May 2024, 23:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
hearing wispers that now AJ and his divide and conquer philosophy is gone the master plan will be eventually to make the 6 AOCs into 3, JQ, QAL and QLink. makes sense.
scrotometer is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by scrotometer:
Old 24th May 2024, 00:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Do Australian EBAs have any history of scope clauses or has there ever been any push for it? Kind of ludicrous to me that they don't exist.
umop apisdn is offline  
Old 24th May 2024, 00:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nz
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 6 Posts
There is a real problem here for the Qantas Group. They have consistently moved flying to the subsidiaries either through new routes or outsourcing existing routes to the extent that the subsidiary companies are now critical to the whole groups plan rather than being important ancillary components.
I would be interested if someone can provide a % of QF short haul routes that are now operated by subsidiaries.
To maintain the Groups market share ( let alone expand it) the company needs X jet capable pilots. The number of pilots gaining CPLs is always greater than the number of pilots who will be suitable and available to operate jets from the left seat ten years later. At the moment the numbers don’t stack up because there is a draw on pilots away from the Group which is greater than what can be recruited and trained. The draw is from retirements and old fashioned competition for staff. There is a reason that Airlines like Singapore and Emirates are trying hard to retain their staff, and start ups like Riyadh are paying top dollar to attract staff. This will pay off within the decade when they are able to increase market share while others contract.
The first step in managing this at a board level is to retain the pilots that are already within the group. There are obvious ways to do this.
73qanda is offline  
The following 6 users liked this post by 73qanda:
Old 24th May 2024, 00:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Cill
Posts: 156
Received 125 Likes on 39 Posts
Mods need to be aware of deliberate and calculated sabotaging of threads by management. They happily came along to the previous NAA thread and pushed their fear campaigns to get yes votes, but then when they decide they want the whole thread shut down they resort to personal attacks knowing the mods will have to close it. It’s a way for them to control narrative. Perhaps rather than close the whole thread which is want they are wanting, just delete the post and sin-bin the offender?
100%. We appreciate what you do but they're manipulating the system!

As the thread starter of the locked Network Aviation EBA with 550 000 views and 1 572 posts, those who want to limit discussion simply mention a period of time and or start the person attacks.
ShandywithSugar is offline  
The following 7 users liked this post by ShandywithSugar:
Old 24th May 2024, 02:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NSW
Posts: 124
Received 306 Likes on 76 Posts
Originally Posted by Slippery_Pete
I think NAA are done. I give it 12-18 months. 200 pilots with 2+ leaving per week isn’t going to last long.

You can’t just dump hundreds of cadets in there, because the check and trainers are leaving too. Plus, ramp up cadet-straight-to-jet-transport-control-seat too quickly and you’ll end up with a prang on your hands. CASA will need to watch it all very closely.

Bonza didn’t go out with a whimper, they failed spectacularly with incredible debts. Rex are teetering and continuing to bleed cash. NAA have the most pissed off pilots in the country and they’re pouring out the door. NJS pilots are similarly disenchanted with how they were treated during negotiations and they’re all refusing to bid to the A220. They’re going to have 29 brand new jets with zero pilots. And the ones who did go across and got a free endorsement and are already leaving.

Unfortunately, it’s all beyond repair now. Even if NAA were to cancel the determination and offer a significantly better deal (+30%), the damage is done.

Going to be some pretty hard conversations behind closed doors at Mascot with a please explain for one head of IR and former union president. So smug and proud of himself sipping Grange in the lounge, but has really created untold problems for the group into the future.

There’s a significant chunk of NAA pilots in the internal hold, and they’re leaving for the Middle East because mainline won’t give them a start date. Internal holds used to allow Qantas to trap and keep people - now it’s just doing the opposite and forcing them overseas. If Qantas want to shore up pilot supply, they need to give the NAA hold file pilots a start ASAP before they head off to the sandpit.

Mods need to be aware of deliberate and calculated sabotaging of threads by management. They happily came along to the previous NAA thread and pushed their fear campaigns to get yes votes, but then when they decide they want the whole thread shut down they resort to personal attacks knowing the mods will have to close it. It’s a way for them to control narrative. Perhaps rather than close the whole thread which is want they are wanting, just delete the post and sin-bin the offender?

I’m sure sameold will be along shortly trying to get this one shut down too.
great post. Thank you.
The manipulation of the threads is very obvious.
it would be nice to have posters verified as pilots. Some of the comments are laughable.
locking the thread lets the bean counter trolls win. Ban them, block their IP and email. Shore, they’ll come back, but at least it takes time.
gross little parasites.
QF have talked the talk about change, now let’s see them walk $$$$$$$$$!$$$!!
Gas Chamber is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 25th May 2024, 02:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NT
Posts: 225
Received 23 Likes on 9 Posts
$4005

such a random number
chookcooker is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 25th May 2024, 02:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 45
Received 28 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by scrotometer
hearing wispers that now AJ and his divide and conquer philosophy is gone the master plan will be eventually to make the 6 AOCs into 3, JQ, QAL and QLink. makes sense.
It certainly does make sense but I wonder if that is going to be as hard as getting toothpaste back into the tube. Have to wonder though, which current red-tail subsidiaries will go to which of the 2 surviving red-tail AOCs? EFA absorbed by mainline, with the current QLink branded aircraft all to that AOC?

Originally Posted by umop apisdn
Do Australian EBAs have any history of scope clauses or has there ever been any push for it? Kind of ludicrous to me that they don't exist.
No history of scope clauses that I know of anyway but happy to be proven wrong. Qantas bought Impulse around 2000 and turned it into Jetstar, bought Network in 2012 and slowly began taking over almost all of the intra-WA RPT flying and some interstate flying, acquired NJS during COVID. They also tried to acquire the 80.1% of Alliance that they don't already own and you could also throw in TAA grabbing hold of the Sunstate, Eastern and Southern AOCs before TAA and Qantas merged soon afterwards in the 1990s. I think Qantas pilots wanted scope clause in a not too distant past EA negotiation but again, I defer to more informed people.
BravoSierraLima is offline  
Old 25th May 2024, 03:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A semi-detached 3x2
Posts: 250
Received 239 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by BravoSierraLima
It certainly does make sense but I wonder if that is going to be as hard as getting toothpaste back into the tube. Have to wonder though, which current red-tail subsidiaries will go to which of the 2 surviving red-tail AOCs? EFA absorbed by mainline, with the current QLink branded aircraft all to that AOC?

.
NJS absorbed into mainline also? Whatever it is going to be I doubt there’s much of a plan
walesregent is offline  
Old 25th May 2024, 04:42
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 604
Received 339 Likes on 120 Posts
Originally Posted by BravoSierraLima
with the current QLink branded aircraft all to that AOC?
The problem with that is that there is now more QLink branded aircraft then Qantas branded.
aussieflyboy is offline  
Old 25th May 2024, 04:43
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 604
Received 339 Likes on 120 Posts
Originally Posted by chookcooker
$4005

such a random number
$4,500 minus 11% Super.

Management might go around telling everyone a dollar figure that includes super (to make it look better than it is) but no-one in Australia describes their wage with super included so I’m certainly not going to.
aussieflyboy is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 25th May 2024, 04:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 175
Received 113 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
$4,500 minus 11% Super.
not quite
A320 Flyer is offline  
Old 25th May 2024, 05:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 191
Received 120 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by BravoSierraLima
It certainly does make sense but I wonder if that is going to be as hard as getting toothpaste back into the tube. Have to wonder though, which current red-tail subsidiaries will go to which of the 2 surviving red-tail AOCs? EFA absorbed by mainline, with the current QLink branded aircraft all to that
Rolling EFA into mainline would be relatively simple. EFA currently use mainline for crewing, crewing software, flight planning and load control. Considering EFA operate the 321/330 both of which mainline operate (almost) the AOC could be easily integrated.
Integrating NJS would be more difficult as it’s a new type for the QF AOC but would be relatively easily achievable and cost saving realised relatively quickly if you factor in the savings by not having brand new 220s pushed up against the fence because NJS can’t crew them.
Simply allow each pilot group to join the bottom of each others lists and you keep everyone happy.

The divide and conquer approach is no longer working so you have too many AOCs that are no longer fit for their original purpose.
davidclarke is offline  
The following 7 users liked this post by davidclarke:
Old 25th May 2024, 09:46
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,650
Received 643 Likes on 183 Posts
Sometimes Qantas cut off their nose to spite their face. In the 1990s an offer was made to Strong for a B scale on the 747 to crew the freighters which were been flown by I think Polar Air. The deal was 10% lower wages and the flying to be built into lines with A scale flying for efficiency. If senior pilots didn’t want to do it they didn’t have to but it would have provided more promotion. Qantas of course rejected it. Fast forward to today and I wonder how much more they are paying Atlas over what their own pilots could have done it for.
dragon man is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by dragon man:
Old 25th May 2024, 09:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Anvya
Posts: 149
Received 49 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
Sometimes Qantas cut off their nose to spite their face. In the 1990s an offer was made to Strong for a B scale on the 747 to crew the freighters which were been flown by I think Polar Air. The deal was 10% lower wages and the flying to be built into lines with A scale flying for efficiency. If senior pilots didn’t want to do it they didn’t have to but it would have provided more promotion. Qantas of course rejected it. Fast forward to today and I wonder how much more they are paying Atlas over what their own pilots could have done it for.
No modern day manager is thinking about consequences of decisions in 30 years , it’s about this years bonus .
KAPAC is online now  
Old 25th May 2024, 09:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bum-phuck, Idaho.
Posts: 44
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dragon man
Sometimes Qantas cut off their nose to spite their face. In the 1990s an offer was made to Strong for a B scale on the 747 to crew the freighters which were been flown by I think Polar Air. The deal was 10% lower wages and the flying to be built into lines with A scale flying for efficiency. If senior pilots didn’t want to do it they didn’t have to but it would have provided more promotion. Qantas of course rejected it. Fast forward to today and I wonder how much more they are paying Atlas over what their own pilots could have done it for.
Mid last decade QF freight made a deposit on a low time 747F in the desert, and even externally type rated pilots to fly it, under woeful EFA conditions.
They pulled the deal at the 11th hour, apparently costing around $2m.
So i very much doubt QF ML could run it cheaper than what they contract to Atlas for.
Global Xpress is offline  
Old 25th May 2024, 10:17
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Oz
Posts: 264
Received 181 Likes on 85 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
Fast forward to today and I wonder how much more they are paying Atlas over what their own pilots could have done it for.
It’s not about the Pilots with Atlas. It’s about who they are and what they can do. It’s a low risk lease.

Cadets being pumped into places out west isn’t the answer. The majority don’t come from out that way, and all have other ambitions.
nomess is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.