Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

RIP Bonza

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2024, 12:39
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are we forgetting Virgin Australia entered administration owing 6.9 billion and Bain bought it for 3.5 billion. And everyone clapped Deloitte as the prodigal sons and daughters

BILLIONS written down at the expense of the shareholders and creditors.

The US has Chapter 11 to wipe the slate clean, reset and go again with a court tick of approval. Australia, subject to a buyer who values a high capacity AOC that has moved nearly a million bums in just over a year, has Hall Chadwick under the auspices of ASIC. In a ridiculously overpriced domestic market that Texel, ASL, Avia Solutions, Mineral Resources and others are already investing in narrow body capacity and capability.
longlegs is offline  
Old 10th May 2024, 12:46
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,215
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by nomess
...
Also claims Bonza has saved passengers $125m. Failed to mention they have burnt at least $120m doing so.
...
Interesting, if not instructive, how the purported savings (essentially the aggregate discount on fares offered by airlines that can stay in business) and the Bonza losses pretty well line up. Tells you what you need to know about Bonza's pricing strategy.

Last edited by MickG0105; 10th May 2024 at 22:26.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 10th May 2024, 16:08
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Sydney
Posts: 99
Received 66 Likes on 30 Posts
As Mick said in the Castle, "Tell 'em they're dreamin'!
MalcolmReynolds is offline  
Old 10th May 2024, 22:24
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 492
Received 380 Likes on 72 Posts
Originally Posted by nomess
He also mentions, he does not support any government financial assistance for Bonza, scrolling on, it then mentions the government should have bailed out Virgin Australia.

Also claims Bonza has saved passengers $125m. Failed to mention they have burnt at least $120m doing so.

Why is everyone including the company, trying to cover up how $hit the thing has financially performed?
I’m not sure what more you expect of someone whose aviation experience totals a year or two chucking bags.
Slippery_Pete is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 10th May 2024, 22:30
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,224
Received 123 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by nomess
He also mentions, he does not support any government financial assistance for Bonza, scrolling on, it then mentions the government should have bailed out Virgin Australia.
Wonder if anyone's asked him about the billions in Government assistance for QF? Or would a response there put his CL membership at risk?
KRviator is online now  
Old 10th May 2024, 23:36
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Age: 58
Posts: 292
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
First of the original bonza birds is heading to a new home in Europe this morning.
https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/VHUIK

Cannot see much point in Bonza continuing, I know a process is being followed but they really need to shut it down and at least give staff a chance to move on.
markis10 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th May 2024, 01:09
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 990
Received 99 Likes on 49 Posts
Where is TJ in all of this? These guys need to be held to account.
SHVC is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 02:22
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NT
Posts: 224
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by nomess
He also mentions, he does not support any government financial assistance for Bonza, scrolling on, it then mentions the government should have bailed out Virgin Australia.

Also claims Bonza has saved passengers $125m. Failed to mention they have burnt at least $120m doing so.

Why is everyone including the company, trying to cover up how $hit the thing has financially performed?
bit different advocating for support from a. Government mandated shutdown vs a company collapsing in the free market.


chookcooker is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by chookcooker:
Old 11th May 2024, 02:36
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Qld
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
That was also a huge problem for VA, with each 'partner' trying to block the others ideas to prevent one from being stronger than the other, with too many industry large partners you also get mired in what each wants to achieve from the venture. All three were just happy to keep VA afloat at a small loss to keep pressure on QF at home. When the losses mounted too high and SQ was the only one bankrolling it, it was always going to end badly. That is probably why Bain is struggling to find suitors, they are probably put off not only by the viability of the airline, but who will have controlling shares if it floats. I'm sure if SQ could get 50% cheap they might entertain it, but there's not many others who'd have the cash for a long term go at it. You'd be mad to buy into airlines at the moment, there is not much stability of cost base for the future.
SQ's past dismal record in the Australian market through AN (via NZ), TT and VA 1.0, plus their failed investments elsewhere such as VS (which ended with DL bailing it out) and NokScoot being liquidated (through SQ's ownership in Scoot Tigerair Pte Ltd) suggests SQ should stick to running their own airline group.

Their sole remaining investment in India (25% in the combined AI/UK group) has been giving them mixed results.

The SQ group is a case example of "stick to what you do well", with outside distractions such as investments always tend to end badly for them financially, having to write off their VA 1.0 investment.
DanV2 is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 03:41
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: sierra village
Posts: 683
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by C441
Other than the 30 or 40 international competitors…..
This is a Bonza RIP thread, silly old me, thinking we are talking about domestic ops. In that space, Qantas is the 500lb gorilla staunchly defended by every member of the Chairman’s Club. Looks and feels like the worst of third world corruption.

International is whole different ball game, I agree.
lucille is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 04:51
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Great Southern Land
Posts: 185
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Heading to? Singas maybe?
ausflyer is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 06:53
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Age: 58
Posts: 292
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by ausflyer
Heading to? Singas maybe?
Subang for the night then Poland via the middle east
markis10 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th May 2024, 07:29
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Oz
Posts: 215
Received 160 Likes on 73 Posts
I see they opted to go via Port Hedland, I assume avoiding Darwin and Alice as they are both on the creditor list, behaviour unknown on arrival should one ‘stop by’.

I also note the Gold Coast has barricaded the thing in so much you would think civil unrest is about to unfold. Melbourne Airport have already conceded defeat and has waived its right to payment. Not sure the others will be as accommodating. Often more court dates before they can get released, not uncommon in these events.

Last edited by nomess; 11th May 2024 at 07:45.
nomess is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th May 2024, 07:56
  #174 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,980
Received 109 Likes on 62 Posts
Devil

I also note the Gold Coast has barricaded the thing in so much you would think civil unrest is about to unfold. Melbourne Airport have already conceded defeat and has waived its right to payment.
Which makes me wonder; Say that the Gold Coast dug their heels in and said in effect, "This Aircraft 'aint goin' nowhere until we get paid!!"

Then what? I'm not a Lawyer, so I have no idea as to whom has rights etc....
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 08:24
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,215
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by Pinky the pilot
Which makes me wonder; Say that the Gold Coast dug their heels in and said in effect, "This Aircraft 'aint goin' nowhere until we get paid!!"

Then what? I'm not a Lawyer, so I have no idea as to whom has rights etc....
Gold Coast Airport are exercising their rights under their Conditions of Use.





However, their conditions should not prevail over the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 with regards to paying out creditors; simply put, you cannot contract around the law. The airport cannot obtain preferential treatment regarding payment of their debt; they'll be treated as a unsecured creditor and gets cents on the dollar, maybe nothing, just like every other unsecured creditor. If push came to shove, the Aircraft Lessor will get a court order requiring the airport to release the aircraft, and they would likely get a costs order against the airport as well. If the airport persists it will ultimately be a matter for the court.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 08:34
  #176 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,980
Received 109 Likes on 62 Posts
it will ultimately be a matter for the court.
Which means that ultimately, the only ones who benefit from all that are (expletives deleted) Lawyers!!

Sometimes I nearly think that Shakespeare got it right!
(HenryVI. Part 2 Act IV Scene 2)
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 08:47
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,299
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Interestingly GC Airport conditions refer to the operator. In this case Bonza is not the owner and the costs remain with Bonza not the owner. Courts will agree
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 09:19
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,833
Received 436 Likes on 238 Posts
Originally Posted by TBM-Legend
Interestingly GC Airport conditions refer to the operator. In this case Bonza is not the owner and the costs remain with Bonza not the owner. Courts will agree
In clause 9.17.1 it states that the aircraft is detained, "whether or not they were incurred by the person who is the operator of the aircraft at the time...etc". So they have covered that. Bonza may have been the operator at the time, but the detention/lien is against the aircraft. I don't think the court case will be as straight forward. These sorts of actions are to squeeze money out of other parties as they know getting cash from the administrators will be difficult. Any aircraft with a lien against it will be next to impossible to re-register without that cost being met. One of the many downsides to leasing out vehicles. Ie Bonza ran up the bill on your aircraft, they wont pay us, so now you owe us. There's many cases of aircraft with liens against them rotting in the side parks of airports around the world.
43Inches is online now  
Old 11th May 2024, 09:32
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 109
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
I was working in the briefing office at (then) ASSY in December 1991 when Compass Mark I went bust. There had been lots of rumours of its impending demise. The airline's allocated gate (or one of them, if there were multiple; but I think it was only one) was just outside the briefing office's windows. On this day, one of their A300s arrived and parked at the gate. A few minutes later the pilots came in and said words to the effect of, "Well, that's it. That's our last flight. We're out of a job." Within less than 30 minutes, we saw guards stationed around the aircraft to ensure it didn't escape.
AnotherFSO is offline  
Old 11th May 2024, 12:35
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,215
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
At the instant the Administrators were appointed on 30 April 2024 all creditors' claims were put on hold. The Lessor exercised its repossession rights to the aircraft prior to the appointment of the Administrators, so they are not bound by the restrictions placed on other creditors. There were similar lien claims over aircraft made by airports when VA went into administration.
MickG0105 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.