Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Lack of Qantas pilots - Route cut from schedule.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Lack of Qantas pilots - Route cut from schedule.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2023, 02:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
Lack of Qantas pilots - Route cut from schedule.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-...2024/103084892

So not Covid, not Putin, not Hamas but lack of pilots. If only there was a solution.

Qantas spokesman... "With a number of our 737 pilots set to begin transitioning to our new Airbus A321XLRs ahead of their expected arrival at the end of next year, we've had to slightly revise our B737 network plans for 2024," the spokesperson said.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2023, 02:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
To be fair, it was only a trial. If you have to consolidate routes, then perhaps the ones you weren't really that sure of in the first place are the first to go?
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 10th Nov 2023, 05:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,551
Received 51 Likes on 19 Posts
“The airline is forced to make further reductions to its regional network as the major carriers, particularly the Rex Group, continued their relentless pillaging of Qantas’s pilot group,” a company statement said.
​​​​​​​Fixed it for you.
chimbu warrior is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by chimbu warrior:
Old 10th Nov 2023, 07:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: australia
Posts: 24
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Is the A321 already meant to arrive next year? its still not even certified yet..
Eaglerocker is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2023, 08:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 577
Received 314 Likes on 110 Posts
It was supposed to be taken over by the A220 in 2024 however a majority of next years deliveries have now been delayed 6+ months. E-Jets are struggling with crew and don’t (yet) have a MEL base.
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 10th Nov 2023, 09:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
Both the A220 and 321XLR are delayed. A321XLR Certification was an issue, now its engine problems on the existing fleet. The fuel tank issue that delayed certification cost 2,500 kgs to fix, so that sounds like an hour less range.

I was speaking with customer service staff in MEL a couple of weeks ago and they revealed that they have been told that most flights there will eventually be A220s.

in other news, QF is going to mod the oldest 737 airframes* to install fuel tank nitrogen inerting, which is not required until 2026. So we are going to have those pieces of —— for a while yet.

*.except the first two, according to the engineer that was laughing/crying about it.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2023, 12:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
I’m really suprised that QF have gone with the PW engine. The PW engine has been problematic worldwide. JQ are operating the CFM engine on their neos and have not had the problems that the pratts have. Wouldn’t commonality and reliability win the day?
davidclarke is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 10th Nov 2023, 19:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 684
Received 81 Likes on 25 Posts
Wouldn’t commonality and reliability win the day?
Far too sensible for the morons (mis)managing things at QF, and there was probably a much smaller bonus involved with selecting CFM rather than PW.
SIUYA is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2023, 19:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by SIUYA
Far too sensible for the morons (mis)managing things at QF, and there was probably a much smaller bonus involved with selecting CFM rather than PW.
Either that or someone got a nice little kick back for going with the alternative. All in the name of competition of course we don’t want to “limit” ourselves to one supplier even though we run the risk of grounding our fleet because that has zero bearing on my bonus.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2023, 19:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
Surprised about the Nitrogen inserting. How many airframes get around without it?
framer is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2023, 00:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pprune is ******
Posts: 165
Received 178 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by framer
Surprised about the Nitrogen inserting. How many airframes get around without it?
about 40… TWA theatrics says the antivaxers
dejapoo is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Nov 2023, 00:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Received 27 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by davidclarke
I’m really suprised that QF have gone with the PW engine. The PW engine has been problematic worldwide. JQ are operating the CFM engine on their neos and have not had the problems that the pratts have. Wouldn’t commonality and reliability win the day?
Unlike the A320 family, the A220 family only comes with PW engines, so commonality between those two types appears to be what QF Group want. The red-tail narrowbody order is up to 134 aircraft, so we can draw our own conclusions about the mix of A32X and A22X. With plenty of life left in a big part of the B737 fleet, that and the fuel tank inerting mentioned in this thread gives QF Group time to wait for Airbus to develop and certify a stretched version of the A220-300.

The woeful NJS pilot EA doesn't expire until 2026, so the question of being able to crew the A220 once the delivery frequency increases is still largely unanswered.
BravoSierraLima is online now  
Old 11th Nov 2023, 01:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 66
Received 73 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by davidclarke
Wouldn’t commonality and reliability win the day?
Not unusual for an airline to spread its investments across multiple manufactures.
Prevents a total fleet grounding should there be an issue with one manufactures product.
Swept-Wing is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2023, 03:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Lagrangian point 2
Posts: 282
Received 33 Likes on 7 Posts
Has Anyone heard/confirm scuttlebutt that the next A380 due back is now being withheld from return to service, due an inability to release crew from other fleets for training, due crew shortages?
ExtraShot is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by ExtraShot:
Old 11th Nov 2023, 04:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Sunny Coast
Posts: 398
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-...2024/103084892

So not Covid, not Putin, not Hamas but lack of pilots. If only there was a solution.
So here's the thing
Does a 738 driver forget how to drive one when getting certified on a 320?
After everything that's gone down at QF recently why couldn't they just be honest and release a statement like

Qantas will be cancelling its direct service between Melbourne and Learmouth / Exmouth
The reason for our decision are as follows
We learned that not everyone wants a one week holiday so a once a week service was kinda hard to sell
We also learned that people would prefer to transit via Perth rather than pay twice as much for the convenience of a direct flight
We really thought that we could gouge people with this direct connection but boy oh boy were we surprised
We seem to get away with charging a bomb on Port Headland direct to Brisbane once a week, like 30% more than via Perth
So as we can't make a killing on this route we may just leave to Bonza to have a crack at 1/4 the airfare
We still can't see how they do it, what with their cheapy prices connecting secondary towns, its totally got our number crunchers stumped


Deano969 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Nov 2023, 05:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,471
Received 315 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by Deano969
So here's the thing
Does a 738 driver forget how to drive one when getting certified on a 320?
Pilots can’t fly multiple fleets, especially when they are significantly different (ie. 737 vs A320). The only exception to this is things like the A330/350 when they get them. They’re considered close enough (arguable) that they can run it as a single fleet type. They’re also the same type rating.
morno is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by morno:
Old 11th Nov 2023, 05:22
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
Pilots can’t fly multiple fleets, especially when they are significantly different
Do you have a reference for that?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2023, 05:44
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,467
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
Do you have a reference for that?
CASA would have some requirement squirrelled away in the bows of a regulation or a stupid MOS, that is extremely difficult to find. Probably an ATPL airliaw question🤬🤬 these days.

Correct me if I’m wrong, however Qantas had a few incidents not long after they introduced the Q400 and had pilots flying all variants, that resulted in quite a few operational incidents, over speeds and procedural excursions.
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2023, 06:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by ExtraShot
Has Anyone heard/confirm scuttlebutt that the next A380 due back is now being withheld from return to service, due an inability to release crew from other fleets for training, due crew shortages?
I doubt the left hand and right hand in that scenario would even be talking.. so I reckon that’s a BS rumour.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2023, 06:54
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,471
Received 315 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
Do you have a reference for that?
I don’t know of a particular law, but let’s look at it from a safety perspective. Do you think it’s very smart? And find me an airline in Australia where you fly more than one type.
morno is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.