Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Mixed Fleet Flying for A380 and A320

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Mixed Fleet Flying for A380 and A320

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Nov 2021, 22:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 174.79*E
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mixed Fleet Flying for A380 and A320

Will QF follow suit? Interesting times ahead.

https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/p...y-japans-civil

Mixed Fleet Flying for A380 and A320 approved by Japan’s Civil Aviation Bureau

C152R is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2021, 23:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
I wouldn’t have approved that. Wrong fleet types. Both have nothing in common when you start to look at systems.

777/787 yes. Commonality is there.

A320/380. Most certainly not.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2021, 23:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
MFF also enables airlines to interchange differently sized aircraft at short notice without crew-scheduling difficulties, allowing them to better match aircraft capacity to passenger demand.
So you drive to work thinking you are in a A380 going to the USA but end up in a Short Haul Sector Flying a A320. How much system knowledge of both aircraft do you need to be safe? You are also halving the amount of Sim exposure you get as you will only be doing it at half pace unless they want to double the amount of Sim people are doing to compensate for MFF.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 02:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in denial
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
I wouldn’t have approved that. Wrong fleet types. Both have nothing in common when you start to look at systems.

777/787 yes. Commonality is there.

A320/380. Most certainly not.
About as similar as A330/A350 mixed flying I’m familiar with.
Veruka Salt is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 02:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,433
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
I flew on an A320/A330 fleet, wasn’t rocket science.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 02:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Asia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Need to stipulate auto lands or late one night after a long day you do a nice 320 flare forgetting your in the 380 today .
Torukmacto is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 03:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Torukmacto
Need to stipulate auto lands or late one night after a long day you do a nice 320 flare forgetting your in the 380 today .
I don’t think you’d get up to initiating the flare before hitting the ground.
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 05:58
  #8 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Veruka Salt
About as similar as A330/A350 mixed flying I’m familiar with.
To underline the irony, that is a single type rating with differences training. Not MFF from the regulatory viewpoint.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 07:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Taipei
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting. Not sure I see the obvious commonality, but if 330/350 mixed fleet works, this may be fine as well.
FMS82 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 08:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I think this makes a great deal of sense. This is not a common type rating, but allowing crews who have both ratings to fly both types. My airline had a dispensation for some senior pilots to alternate (not daily) between Boeing and Airbus during the period when we were introducing a new fleet. This is actually a lot easier due to the way the Airbus fly by wire handling works. ANA won't be typing all their A320 pilots on the A380. But those that they do can fly more and certainly carry out more landings flying the minibus, rather than the limited experience provided by operating back and forth to Hawai, which was what I heard their A380s were mainly doing.
lederhosen is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 08:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,536
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Enough mixed fleet pilots have messed up ZFW and speeds with A330/A340s, hopefully the differences should be more obvious here.

It's probably doable with an A380 pilot going onto the A320, especially if he flew the baby bus on his way up the career ladder. Probably not such a good idea the other way, especially if the pilot concerned has no heavy time.
krismiler is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 09:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Right hand seat of a 777
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
I wouldn’t have approved that. Wrong fleet types. Both have nothing in common when you start to look at systems.

777/787 yes. Commonality is there.

A320/380. Most certainly not.
I didn't know the "Take-Off" and "Land" buttons were different in Airbus'?

OMAA
OMAAbound is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 20:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,380
Received 210 Likes on 95 Posts
You want Mixed Fleet Flying, we used to move between single-engine helicopters, twin-engine helos, then hop into a light twin aeroplane.

Never got confused whether to Land and Stop, or Stop and Land. There was a little confusion, though, where the Baron and the Chieftain had their gear and flap handles on reversed sides.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2021, 21:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Islas Baleares
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swiss used to have Mixed Fleet Flying between A319/A320/A321/A330-200/A330-300. IIRC they had a separate fleet of senior crew who did MFF on just the A330s and A340s.
BewareOfTheSharklets is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2021, 19:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lets be serious here.

1. Any pilot that can fly either a 380 or a 320 well can fly both well at the same time. The TEM skills required to fly different types are the same ones required to fly one type.
2. Many pilots struggle to fly one aircraft well.
3. A pilot who struggles to fly one aircraft well will have a more difficult time flying two different types at the same time.

It all comes down to training. My most recent sim partner had the SOP down so well that every single checklist response was letter perfect. Unfortunately this meant that every time we did landings without the autothrust the checklist response for "Autothrust" was "Speed", despite the FMA being blank. Two different instructors saw this and said nothing. If a training department can't teach the basics, it's unlikely that the pilots will fly well, MFF or not. We used to change aircraft type every six months and after each switch the incidents went through the roof (including multiple aircraft climbing through 10 000' without pressurization). The solution decided upon by management was a stern lecture to the struggling pilots in question and an in increase in the quantity of poor training.
ahramin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.