Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

ACMA, 5G and Radio Altimetry

Old 11th Nov 2020, 07:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 312
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
ACMA, 5G and Radio Altimetry

Some Australian pilots may be aware of the 5G interference thread with a link to this report https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uplo...ed_changes.pdf which is rather heavy going, but contains a rather worrying Executive Summary. In short, the tests seem to reveal potential interference between the new US 5G bands and the nearly-adjacent Radio Altimetry band (4.2-4.4GHz).

Does anyone know if the airlines were involved in any representation to ACMA prior to the allocation of the new 5G mobile phone spectrum? Don't get me wrong, I'm not in the anti-5G lobby. But I do like my Radio Altimeter to be reliable, as it's especially useful in the final phases of flight, that bit near the ground. Just wondering if anyone's been checking out the situation what with all the other distractions.
Pearly White is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2020, 08:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,215
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by Pearly White
Some Australian pilots may be aware of the 5G interference thread with a link to this report https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uplo...ed_changes.pdf which is rather heavy going, but contains a rather worrying Executive Summary. In short, the tests seem to reveal potential interference between the new US 5G bands and the nearly-adjacent Radio Altimetry band (4.2-4.4GHz).

Does anyone know if the airlines were involved in any representation to ACMA prior to the allocation of the new 5G mobile phone spectrum? Don't get me wrong, I'm not in the anti-5G lobby. But I do like my Radio Altimeter to be reliable, as it's especially useful in the final phases of flight, that bit near the ground. Just wondering if anyone's been checking out the situation what with all the other distractions.
Probably worth noting that the Australian 5G bands (3.5 - 3.6GHz) are at a lower frequency than the US 5G bands (3.7 - 3.98GHz). There's a short ACMA paper on the topic here.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2020, 09:09
  #3 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 835
Received 42 Likes on 22 Posts
Ther Australian 5G band of concern is 3.575 - 3.7Ghz.
TWT is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2020, 22:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: sierra village
Posts: 681
Received 118 Likes on 62 Posts
Read the ACMA paper. Very interesting. And concerning.

Any idea why transmissions or interference from other aircraft’s rad alts don’t appear to draw the same concerns. Also ground based S band weather radar is 2-4 GHz and it’s transmitted at high power, again there seems to be less interest in this.
lucille is offline  
Old 3rd May 2023, 15:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Air travel chaos looms as US keeps 5G altimeter refit deadline

Air travel chaos looms as US keeps 5G altimeter refit deadline - BBC News
Longtimer is offline  
Old 4th May 2023, 12:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Darwin
Posts: 39
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Check the CASA DRS site, 100s of RAD ALT faults.

AD is imminent in the US, bandpass filters being produced now to filter out the 5g noise and to be fitted at the antenna connection to the RAD ALT receiver.
Badengo is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2023, 03:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I work for a US airline now. We've had limits on some of the airports we fly to. The majority are ok - or have at least one runway that's ok - as long as we comply with certain limitations or alternate procedures. A half doz or so have no remedial procedures so visual weather conditions only. We've been having the filters fitted for the last several months. Most of our aircraft have 2x rad alts so to maximise the limited number of filters for airframes we've been disabling the 2nd rad alt and configuring the systems to a single rad. alt. installation so we only need a single filter on the remaining #1 rad. alt.

If only the previous Gov. had set some limits on the frequency auction off for signal strength and orientation near airports this whole mess could have been largely avoided.
Tinstaafl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.