Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF9 to go via Singapore?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2020, 05:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: MEL
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF9 to go via Singapore?

"Qantas’ decision to reroute its Perth-London QF9 flight to avoid Iranian airspace could mean adding a Singapore stopover to refuel the Boeing 787-9"

https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...ing-787-flight

MelbourneFlyer is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 06:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Qantas spokesman says that 90 seats will be left vacant on the Perth-London QF9 flight in order to reduce the overall weight and compensate for the diversion, which will now bypass Iran and Iraq and track across Afghanistan, adding around 40-50 minutes to the journey.
Qantas spokesperson as saying the airline is also considering giving the Perth-London QF9 flight a 'fuel stop' in Singapore which would allow it to carry a full load of passengers throughout the journey.
A marginal route with 90 seats out of 236 not available commercially is a loss making route. Maybe Fort Fumble will threaten to sell this 787 too!

As was predicted this route is finely balanced. Despite much fanfare from the usual flag wavers and believers, another Grand Vision from Little Napoleon sees the Middle eastern hub abandoned, Perth London err Re-routed and QF9 via Singapore.
Another Fort Fumble random walk, from Singapore to Dubai and back again.
Rated De is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 06:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Gafa
Posts: 198
Received 10 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Rated De
A marginal route with 90 seats out of 236 not available commercially is a loss making route. Maybe Fort Fumble will threaten to sell this 787 too!

As was predicted this route is finely balanced. Despite much fanfare from the usual flag wavers and believers, another Grand Vision from Little Napoleon sees the Middle eastern hub abandoned, Perth London err Re-routed and QF9 via Singapore.
Another Fort Fumble random walk, from Singapore to Dubai and back again.
I daresay that should QF9 route via Singapore due to the situation in Iran, they will be doing so with full loads...
Maggie Island is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 06:40
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,074
Received 130 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Rated De
A marginal route with 90 seats out of 236 not available commercially is a loss making route. Maybe Fort Fumble will threaten to sell this 787 too!

As was predicted this route is finely balanced. Despite much fanfare from the usual flag wavers and believers, another Grand Vision from Little Napoleon sees the Middle eastern hub abandoned, Perth London err Re-routed and QF9 via Singapore.
Another Fort Fumble random walk, from Singapore to Dubai and back again.
You are constantly on the attack. Yes the route is marginal but appears to have been working, no idea about the profitability. Yes taking 90 seats out would destroy any profit but so would getting shot down. Obviously when the route was planned avoiding a war zone was not required.

Damned if they do damned if they don’t with you.

I will eat my words if it reroutes through SIN and stays that way when the conflict allows more direct routing again. Now where is that 350.......
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 07:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,636
Received 615 Likes on 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Maggie Island
I daresay that should QF9 route via Singapore due to the situation in Iran, they will be doing so with full loads...
Correct, but would you pay a premium fare to now stop in Singapore instead of non stop?
dragon man is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 08:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,471
Received 318 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by Global Aviator
You are constantly on the attack. Yes the route is marginal but appears to have been working, no idea about the profitability. Yes taking 90 seats out would destroy any profit but so would getting shot down. Obviously when the route was planned avoiding a war zone was not required.

Damned if they do damned if they don’t with you.

I will eat my words if it reroutes through SIN and stays that way when the conflict allows more direct routing again. Now where is that 350.......
Exactly. Rated De, what exactly do you think Qantas should be doing? Or are you only interested in hanging **** on Alan?
morno is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 08:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Mostly here, sometimes over there...
Posts: 373
Received 63 Likes on 19 Posts
Interesting......Singas isn't really on the way.

I would recommend Dubai, but what would I know.
Buttscratcher is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 08:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
Correct, but would you pay a premium fare to now stop in Singapore instead of non stop?
They may not need to - a fuel stop in Singapore would slash fuel costs for the route. Might be able to price it closer to QF1 and still be profitable.
SecretAngel is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 09:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,367
Received 82 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Buttscratcher
Interesting......Singas isn't really on the way.

I would recommend Dubai, but what would I know.
​​​​​​

Well, not enough as it turns out. This afternoon Iran has publicly advised that it will attack Dubai and Haifa in the next round of escalation. Which will open the door to hell just a bit wider.

Last edited by Australopithecus; 8th Jan 2020 at 10:41.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 09:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
There are a few malcontents who believe that Qantas does nothing that's right, no matter the circumstances. Why don't they just STFU?
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 10:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 170 Likes on 87 Posts
If you can believe the Flightaware website, both Qantas 9 &10 have been planned non stop. Over Afghanistan/India inlieu of over Iran/Iraq.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 10:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,367
Received 82 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
If you can believe the Flightaware website, both Qantas 9 &10 have been planned non stop. Over Afghanistan/India inlieu of over Iran/Iraq.
I guess they’ll take the loss of revenue today and tomorrow in order to position 787 crews up in SIN for the continuation of the service after the tech stop. Assuming that the belligerents keep playing tit for tat.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 19:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 280
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Buttscratcher
Interesting......Singas isn't really on the way.
I would recommend Dubai, but what would I know.
If you have to make a fuel-only stop, then Sri Lanka or India would make better logistical sense than Dubai
kiwi grey is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 20:55
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by kiwi grey
If you have to make a fuel-only stop, then Sri Lanka or India would make better logistical sense than Dubai
new crew would be needed for the continued sector due duty limits. It’s much easier to get crew to and from Singapore.
Chad Gates is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 21:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Or they could operate MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in an A380 and carry more than 3 times as many punters including First Class!
…or skip PER altogether and do MEL-HKG-LHR. 
C441 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 22:47
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
I would be asking for a refund. Many still connect to this service from the East Coast. MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in a 787 is not something to look forward to.

Ask for your cash back and book SIA. A350/A380 combo to London is the best way over these days. I have not flown QF International in a while until they pick up their game.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 22:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C441
Or they could operate MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in an A380 and carry more than 3 times as many punters including First Class!
…or skip PER altogether and do MEL-HKG-LHR. 
Rather like QF prior to Little Napoleon's tantrum declaring the airline "terminal".
The load factors on the Perth London service are impressive, provided one ignores the net seat reduction.

The withdrawal from Frankfurt, Hong Kong (London) and Bangkok (London) with a hub switch to Dubai. The case present to the ACCC was dire, QF could not operate profitably nor compete.
Roll forward five years, the airline transformed, switched back to Singapore. Give it a little more time and the Network will be "grown" to reflect "customer preference" through Singapore, Bangkok and Hong Kong to London.
Throw in the Frankfurt or some other secondary European port and a five year random walk finds the airline right back where it started.

Genius!
Rated De is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 22:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
I would be asking for a refund. Many still connect to this service from the East Coast. MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in a 787 is not something to look forward to.

Ask for your cash back and book SIA. A350/A380 combo to London is the best way over these days. I have not flown QF International in a while until they pick up their game.
Funny stuff.
PPRuNeUser0184 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 23:17
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,636
Received 615 Likes on 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Australopithecus
I guess they’ll take the loss of revenue today and tomorrow in order to position 787 crews up in SIN for the continuation of the service after the tech stop. Assuming that the belligerents keep playing tit for tat.
The only problem with that is they will run short of crew as it’s not planned for, and I will add that’s not their fault.
dragon man is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 23:17
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 81
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
I would be asking for a refund. Many still connect to this service from the East Coast. MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in a 787 is not something to look forward to.

Ask for your cash back and book SIA. A350/A380 combo to London is the best way over these days. I have not flown QF International in a while until they pick up their game.
Just as well I'm not still working in the call centre then
Chris2303 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.