QF9 to go via Singapore?
"Qantas’ decision to reroute its Perth-London QF9 flight to avoid Iranian airspace could mean adding a Singapore stopover to refuel the Boeing 787-9"
https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...ing-787-flight |
A Qantas spokesman says that 90 seats will be left vacant on the Perth-London QF9 flight in order to reduce the overall weight and compensate for the diversion, which will now bypass Iran and Iraq and track across Afghanistan, adding around 40-50 minutes to the journey. Qantas spokesperson as saying the airline is also considering giving the Perth-London QF9 flight a 'fuel stop' in Singapore which would allow it to carry a full load of passengers throughout the journey. As was predicted this route is finely balanced. Despite much fanfare from the usual flag wavers and believers, another Grand Vision from Little Napoleon sees the Middle eastern hub abandoned, Perth London err Re-routed and QF9 via Singapore. Another Fort Fumble random walk, from Singapore to Dubai and back again. |
Originally Posted by Rated De
(Post 10656544)
A marginal route with 90 seats out of 236 not available commercially is a loss making route. Maybe Fort Fumble will threaten to sell this 787 too!
As was predicted this route is finely balanced. Despite much fanfare from the usual flag wavers and believers, another Grand Vision from Little Napoleon sees the Middle eastern hub abandoned, Perth London err Re-routed and QF9 via Singapore. Another Fort Fumble random walk, from Singapore to Dubai and back again. |
Originally Posted by Rated De
(Post 10656544)
A marginal route with 90 seats out of 236 not available commercially is a loss making route. Maybe Fort Fumble will threaten to sell this 787 too!
As was predicted this route is finely balanced. Despite much fanfare from the usual flag wavers and believers, another Grand Vision from Little Napoleon sees the Middle eastern hub abandoned, Perth London err Re-routed and QF9 via Singapore. Another Fort Fumble random walk, from Singapore to Dubai and back again. Damned if they do damned if they don’t with you. I will eat my words if it reroutes through SIN and stays that way when the conflict allows more direct routing again. Now where is that 350....... |
Originally Posted by Maggie Island
(Post 10656577)
I daresay that should QF9 route via Singapore due to the situation in Iran, they will be doing so with full loads...
|
Originally Posted by Global Aviator
(Post 10656580)
You are constantly on the attack. Yes the route is marginal but appears to have been working, no idea about the profitability. Yes taking 90 seats out would destroy any profit but so would getting shot down. Obviously when the route was planned avoiding a war zone was not required.
Damned if they do damned if they don’t with you. I will eat my words if it reroutes through SIN and stays that way when the conflict allows more direct routing again. Now where is that 350....... |
Interesting......Singas isn't really on the way.
I would recommend Dubai, but what would I know. |
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10656598)
Correct, but would you pay a premium fare to now stop in Singapore instead of non stop?
|
Originally Posted by Buttscratcher
(Post 10656677)
Interesting......Singas isn't really on the way.
I would recommend Dubai, but what would I know. Well, not enough as it turns out. This afternoon Iran has publicly advised that it will attack Dubai and Haifa in the next round of escalation. Which will open the door to hell just a bit wider. |
There are a few malcontents who believe that Qantas does nothing that's right, no matter the circumstances. Why don't they just STFU? :mad:
|
If you can believe the Flightaware website, both Qantas 9 &10 have been planned non stop. Over Afghanistan/India inlieu of over Iran/Iraq.
|
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
(Post 10656772)
If you can believe the Flightaware website, both Qantas 9 &10 have been planned non stop. Over Afghanistan/India inlieu of over Iran/Iraq.
|
Originally Posted by Buttscratcher
(Post 10656677)
Interesting......Singas isn't really on the way.
I would recommend Dubai, but what would I know. |
Originally Posted by kiwi grey
(Post 10657249)
If you have to make a fuel-only stop, then Sri Lanka or India would make better logistical sense than Dubai
|
Or they could operate MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in an A380 and carry more than 3 times as many punters including First Class! :rolleyes:
…or skip PER altogether and do MEL-HKG-LHR. :) |
I would be asking for a refund. Many still connect to this service from the East Coast. MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in a 787 is not something to look forward to.
Ask for your cash back and book SIA. A350/A380 combo to London is the best way over these days. I have not flown QF International in a while until they pick up their game. |
Originally Posted by C441
(Post 10657381)
Or they could operate MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in an A380 and carry more than 3 times as many punters including First Class! :rolleyes:
…or skip PER altogether and do MEL-HKG-LHR. :) The load factors on the Perth London service are impressive, provided one ignores the net seat reduction. The withdrawal from Frankfurt, Hong Kong (London) and Bangkok (London) with a hub switch to Dubai. The case present to the ACCC was dire, QF could not operate profitably nor compete. Roll forward five years, the airline transformed, switched back to Singapore. Give it a little more time and the Network will be "grown" to reflect "customer preference" through Singapore, Bangkok and Hong Kong to London. Throw in the Frankfurt or some other secondary European port and a five year random walk finds the airline right back where it started. Genius! |
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 10657435)
I would be asking for a refund. Many still connect to this service from the East Coast. MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in a 787 is not something to look forward to.
Ask for your cash back and book SIA. A350/A380 combo to London is the best way over these days. I have not flown QF International in a while until they pick up their game. |
Originally Posted by Australopithecus
(Post 10656798)
I guess they’ll take the loss of revenue today and tomorrow in order to position 787 crews up in SIN for the continuation of the service after the tech stop. Assuming that the belligerents keep playing tit for tat.
|
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 10657435)
I would be asking for a refund. Many still connect to this service from the East Coast. MEL-PER-SIN-LHR in a 787 is not something to look forward to.
Ask for your cash back and book SIA. A350/A380 combo to London is the best way over these days. I have not flown QF International in a while until they pick up their game. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.