Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

QF 63 SYD JNB Post 744 Retirement.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF 63 SYD JNB Post 744 Retirement.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2019, 11:03
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by Roo
Full pax, Easy! As a rough comparison...
BNE-LAX (6283nm) is 320nm further than JNB-SYD (5963nm)
Keep talking it up! Seems to be more A380 ops out of JNB than B787 at present!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2019, 11:36
  #42 (permalink)  
Roo
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Sydney.NSW.Australia
Posts: 58
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Not talking it up. Last place I would want to go. Simply pointing out the 789 can do it. 380 can have it.
Roo is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 04:19
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like the 380 is to be withdrawn from DFW from November replaced by 787-9 so I’d say 380 ops to JNB a distinct possibility.
Bad Adventures is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 05:33
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Well that takes about 3 airframes so it frees the 380 to do either Santiago or Joburg or San Fran. Joburg fits in with Haneda and San Fran has no 380 gates at the present arrival time so I’d say Santiago.
dragon man is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 06:39
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Perhaps DOT approval is not forthcoming....demand is still quite solid for DFW isn’t it?
crosscutter is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 06:52
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
Lots of MEL 787 positions in the recent training vacancies. Perhaps the plan is to run a daily 787 MEL-DFW and a 787 SYD-DFW to provide the same sort of capacity as present?
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 07:42
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Let’s not forget the last plan according to DA was Tokyo JNB and SCL to be the last 747 trips into 2020 with HNL returning to the 330 and remaining US services being transferred to other fleets. That email was only 2 months ago

The BNE slots ... BNE Chicago finally? Maybe it’s BNE DFW. Who’s going to do SYD SFO? Maybe MEL base.

Last edited by crosscutter; 17th Apr 2019 at 07:55.
crosscutter is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 22:27
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
Perhaps the plan is to run a daily 787 MEL-DFW…..
MEL-DFW-MEL was planned to be the original 787 service but the average overall headwind DFW-MEL meant the service was marginal.
Doesn't mean it won't be done, but unlikely.

Meanwhile there's another 6 MEL based A380 Capt vacancies. Maybe this is to allow MEL base to do SIN-LHR while SYD takes over Jo'burg and Santiago. Jo'burg has always had good premium loads including First Class when the 747 had it.

Who knows what they're thinking when the Networks guru and head of International are moved along in quick succession??
C441 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2019, 04:43
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Another problem has arisen as I believe a 330 is grounded for maybe 2 months as engineering blew up the yellow hydraulic system with a new rig that had not been correctly set. OEB might now be staying longer.
dragon man is offline  
Old 7th May 2019, 05:18
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sydney/San Fran going 787 from December so I’d say the quads to stay on the polar routes for now.
Bad Adventures is offline  
Old 7th May 2019, 06:54
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Roo
Not talking it up. Last place I would want to go. Simply pointing out the 789 can do it. 380 can have it.
Hey Roo,
Jnb A380, great stopovers for us Poms.
No time change, great hotels, world class golf courses, and steak and wine as good as In Oz. And perhaps a local Game Park drive on your days off.
Same for you minus the time change!.
cessnapete is offline  
Old 7th May 2019, 11:52
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Perth
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747-8

Buy it and continue on as is.
Andre Meyer is offline  
Old 7th May 2019, 23:39
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 199
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Andre Meyer
747-8

Buy it and continue on as is.
No future in 4 holers. Backward move.
Mk 1 is offline  
Old 7th May 2019, 23:58
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by Mk 1
No future in 4 holers. Backward move.
Do not agree, the 800 has incredible payload capacity and is far more fuel efficient than the 380.
dragon man is offline  
Old 8th May 2019, 01:14
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes, the B747-8 airframe/engine combination are performing very well but reports from within Lufthansa indicate that the interior fitout of the Intercontinental Passenger version is not up to an acceptable standard.

4 Engine Aircraft are now following the path of dinosaurs.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 8th May 2019, 08:27
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man


Do not agree, the 800 has incredible payload capacity and is far more fuel efficient than the 380.
That is correct, they are overwhelmingly a better choice.
They have an impressive cargo volume their payload capacity is comparable to a 747-400ER.

The problem with the aircraft is not the performance it is simply the fuel included CASK.


Rated De is offline  
Old 8th May 2019, 09:26
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
From Johannesburg to Sydney it will uplift in summer approx double the ERs payload.
dragon man is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.