B717 Heavy Maintenance
Thread Starter
B717 Heavy Maintenance
Folks,
I am a little surprised that closure of B717 heavy maintenance at Canberra, and its move to Singapore seems to have gone unnoticed.
Apparently about 40 redundancies of skilled/licensed labor reported.
As always, the terrible labor productivity, brought about by ratbag CASA regulation, working in lockstep with equally ratbag award demarcation, is a major culprit.
And, if you think Singapore is "cheap labor", you obviously don't know much about Singapore.
The "Australian Way" triumphs again.
Tootle pip!!
I am a little surprised that closure of B717 heavy maintenance at Canberra, and its move to Singapore seems to have gone unnoticed.
Apparently about 40 redundancies of skilled/licensed labor reported.
As always, the terrible labor productivity, brought about by ratbag CASA regulation, working in lockstep with equally ratbag award demarcation, is a major culprit.
And, if you think Singapore is "cheap labor", you obviously don't know much about Singapore.
The "Australian Way" triumphs again.
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Folks,
I am a little surprised that closure of B717 heavy maintenance at Canberra, and its move to Singapore seems to have gone unnoticed.
Apparently about 40 redundancies of skilled/licensed labor reported.
As always, the terrible labor productivity, brought about by ratbag CASA regulation, working in lockstep with equally ratbag award demarcation, is a major culprit.
And, if you think Singapore is "cheap labor", you obviously don't know much about Singapore.
The "Australian Way" triumphs again.
Tootle pip!!
I am a little surprised that closure of B717 heavy maintenance at Canberra, and its move to Singapore seems to have gone unnoticed.
Apparently about 40 redundancies of skilled/licensed labor reported.
As always, the terrible labor productivity, brought about by ratbag CASA regulation, working in lockstep with equally ratbag award demarcation, is a major culprit.
And, if you think Singapore is "cheap labor", you obviously don't know much about Singapore.
The "Australian Way" triumphs again.
Tootle pip!!
Control of engineering work process used to be considered strategic.
To support the assertion of 'uneconomic' Qantas progressively shrunk its heavy maintenance in Australia reducing the fleet to arrive at a non-sustainable cost base. That the infrastructure was largely a result of the taxpayer benevolence, wasn't noticed. That Qantas 'competitively tendered' with John Holland whilst convicted felon former CFO Gregg sat incredibly in both camps seemed not to worry anybody.
Once the facility was closed and all heavy maintenance transferred offshore, a strange thing happened.
The overseas facilities reported 'increased workload' and less availability; it became commonplace for 'customer aircraft' like those of the airline Qantas, to slip down the priority list.
With newly minted MBA running around minimising cost, at least in the short term, this remains the standard play book.
Given the relative size of the 717 fleet and the declining numbers in operation worldwide, maintenance may become harder to find..
Last edited by Rated De; 31st Jan 2019 at 01:20. Reason: amended as per Travelator
Pretty sure that every single 717 built is still in continuous service. There may be a couple that have been neglected and no operators want to touch them though.
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had meant to edit the 'rapid decline' in numbers.
Delta airlines have leased well over 50% of the operating aircraft and have indicated their plans, with orders to replace the aging fleet. Almost the entire remaining complement are operated by US Carriers, thus it remains an interesting question as to how long the maintenance will be supported outside the USA when the only customer in Asia Pacific is Qantas?
Perhaps Qantas will shove a whole bunch of JQ A320 at them too?
https://www.airfleets.net/listing/b717-4-statasc.htm
Thread Starter
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Qantas taking the unparalleled step of grounding their fleet and locking out their staff on a flimsy and curiously unchallenged pretext, broke forever any semblance of trust.
Very sad ( and expensive) for those who uprooted families to move to the Peoples Popular and Democratic Green Republic of ACT in the reasonable expectation of long term employment.
Tootle pip!!
Tootle pip!!
I still wouldn't put it past QF!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Perth
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would have thought sending the B717 across to Perth would have been a better solution with lots of experienced LAMES there compared with Singapore. Can't recall ever seeing a B717 in South East Asia other than a handful at Bangkok Airways many years ago, perhaps?
With first hand knowledge and experience with ST doing work on aircraft I am very concerned about what's about to happen.
I hope the LAME's are ready to put in extra work and hours to bring the aircraft back up to standard when they hit Australian shores again.
I hope the LAME's are ready to put in extra work and hours to bring the aircraft back up to standard when they hit Australian shores again.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Off shore maintenance? Bad idea. You spend a million dollars here in Australia it remains in the Australian system and goes into the various things Australians buy, including air fares. So you eventually get it back. Do the job overseas, the money is gone forever.
Not only that, as someone mentioned, off-shore you pretty much have to have an inspector behind every man. They just don't care. When the ship comes back you will have to spend many hours getting it back up to scratch.
Not only that, as someone mentioned, off-shore you pretty much have to have an inspector behind every man. They just don't care. When the ship comes back you will have to spend many hours getting it back up to scratch.
Off shore maintenance? Bad idea. You spend a million dollars here in Australia it remains in the Australian system and goes into the various things Australians buy, including air fares. So you eventually get it back. Do the job overseas, the money is gone forever.
Not only that, as someone mentioned, off-shore you pretty much have to have an inspector behind every man. They just don't care. When the ship comes back you will have to spend many hours getting it back up to scratch.
Not only that, as someone mentioned, off-shore you pretty much have to have an inspector behind every man. They just don't care. When the ship comes back you will have to spend many hours getting it back up to scratch.
Thread Starter
Bit touchy there, aren't you?? I didn't suggest it did, although quite how you have them there, ( or any large aircraft) despite said ACT being a "nuclear free zone", I don't know.
Tootle pip!!
Last edited by LeadSled; 6th Feb 2019 at 23:31. Reason: typo
Yes as humans are simply impersonal units of labour cost, the spreadsheet records nothing other than legal minimum enforceable amount this unit cost must be paid.
Qantas taking the unparalleled step of grounding their fleet and locking out their staff on a flimsy and curiously unchallenged pretext, broke forever any semblance of trust.
Qantas taking the unparalleled step of grounding their fleet and locking out their staff on a flimsy and curiously unchallenged pretext, broke forever any semblance of trust.
I take it from that Mr K is no fan of AJ.