How our World War aces changed aviation history
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How our World War aces changed aviation history
https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...a0E63_Ej1qTAa4
BERT Hinkler pushed his khaki-coloured Sopwith Camel fighter through the cold mountain air over the Italian Alps, the flimsy wood and fabric biplane *rocking as if shivering against the onset of a Euro*pean winter.
BERT Hinkler pushed his khaki-coloured Sopwith Camel fighter through the cold mountain air over the Italian Alps, the flimsy wood and fabric biplane *rocking as if shivering against the onset of a Euro*pean winter.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although a kiwi I found the wikipedia article about Sir Keith Park an amazing read.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Park
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Park
Amazing how almost any story of a heroic military man in service to the crown includes evidence of British arrogance and incompetence. The treatment of Keith Park and Hugh Downing after the Battle of Britain was shameful.
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,980
Received 108 Likes
on
61 Posts
The treatment of Keith Park and Hugh Downing after the Battle of Britain was shameful.
It most certainly was. I never cease to be amazed at how personal ambition and prejudice is, if anything, amplified in wartime. In my opinion (I haven't read the article) the efforts of Leigh-Mallory are a case in point.
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding of Leigh Mallorys “big wing” came from the movie “The Battle of Britain” although I haven’t seen it in a while, the big wing was portrayed as the saviour of the day. Whereas the more you read about it, it had a very questionable effect. Very slow to form up such a big formation, slow to react etc.
My understanding of Leigh Mallorys “big wing” came from the movie “The Battle of Britain” although I haven’t seen it in a while, the big wing was portrayed as the saviour of the day. Whereas the more you read about it, it had a very questionable effect. Very slow to form up such a big formation, slow to react etc.
Point was, at that point, the number of Germans shot down was largely irrelevant- Goring's brief was to cripple the RAF so it could not impede an invasion force in particular the ability of the Stukas to support an invasion by disabling the RN. Dowding was simply trying to survive- to keep aircraft, pilots and airfields in operation until the weather turned and made an invasion impossible.To this end 12 Groups main task was to protect 11 Groups airfields- a task they largely neglected.
In any case, even were the "big wing" considered a reasonable strategy, it was only possible because of the geographical location of 12 groups squadrons further North, where they had time and space to form up. 11 group squadrons only just had time to launch in small formations when the RD chains detected raids- it was an entirely appropriate tactic.
Interesting that Bader was mentioned- one of the most shameful episodes was the Air Ministry calling Bader- then a wing-commander- to testify into an enquiry ostensibly bout the battle, but in fact as an excuse to criticize Dowding and by association Park. His testimony was unsurprisingly simply a positive view of the tactics that he took part in and that made him famous, but was used as evidence he the Battle tactics of Dowding and Park were flawed.
Last edited by Wizofoz; 8th Nov 2018 at 01:04.
"Downing" = Dowding
Thanks Chris - 'Downing' was disturbing my fragile little mind
'Big Wings' were a very reasonable strategy - as the US 8th Airforce later proved. The problem in 1940 was, Dowding was on an island with basically zero (but possibly growing) support, a finite supply of aircraft and even more importantly and more finite numbers of pilots. Taking Bader's side for a moment, I can WELL understand pilots getting extremely upset at taking off with token handfuls of Spits and Hurricanes with eight puny 303's against canon armed 109's and massed formations of bombers. It must have been bloody terrifying, aside from seeming just silly. But Dowding only had limited supplies and needed to use them extremely sparingly. Radar allowed him to do this and he used that to its fullest extent - it also allowed the German pilots to be constantly surprised, especially with 109's limited to 15 minutes flight time over the UK.
An interesting side point I heard second hand from Georing (through the incredible Eric Brown) who was asked who he thought 'won' the Battle of Britain. Goering replied 'It was a draw!' When questioned further, he said the RAF were losing less aircraft than the Luftwaffe, right up until the last 'official' week of the Battle. In other words, the Luftwaffe had turned the tide. This is factual and not fantasy. Once the tide had turned, Goering said, Hitler 'felt' the Battle was won (or could be) and decided to withdraw large sections of the Luftwaffe to start preparations for Barbarossa - the invasion of Russia. And on that score as well, few know that advance German shock troops actually got inside the Kremlin before the main advance halted as it's supply lines became overly extended.
Dowding, at the time, was completely correct I would suggest.
'Big Wings' were a very reasonable strategy - as the US 8th Airforce later proved. The problem in 1940 was, Dowding was on an island with basically zero (but possibly growing) support, a finite supply of aircraft and even more importantly and more finite numbers of pilots. Taking Bader's side for a moment, I can WELL understand pilots getting extremely upset at taking off with token handfuls of Spits and Hurricanes with eight puny 303's against canon armed 109's and massed formations of bombers. It must have been bloody terrifying, aside from seeming just silly. But Dowding only had limited supplies and needed to use them extremely sparingly. Radar allowed him to do this and he used that to its fullest extent - it also allowed the German pilots to be constantly surprised, especially with 109's limited to 15 minutes flight time over the UK.
An interesting side point I heard second hand from Georing (through the incredible Eric Brown) who was asked who he thought 'won' the Battle of Britain. Goering replied 'It was a draw!' When questioned further, he said the RAF were losing less aircraft than the Luftwaffe, right up until the last 'official' week of the Battle. In other words, the Luftwaffe had turned the tide. This is factual and not fantasy. Once the tide had turned, Goering said, Hitler 'felt' the Battle was won (or could be) and decided to withdraw large sections of the Luftwaffe to start preparations for Barbarossa - the invasion of Russia. And on that score as well, few know that advance German shock troops actually got inside the Kremlin before the main advance halted as it's supply lines became overly extended.
Dowding, at the time, was completely correct I would suggest.
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,980
Received 108 Likes
on
61 Posts
Pinky - there is a statue of Dowding outside St Clement Danes, where it has been since 1988.
As for the 'Big wing' theory; Has that not been somewhat discredited re claims of enemy a/c destroyed when official Luftwaffe losses were finally known? I seem to remember recently reading what I considered to be a reasonably argued critique which found against the big wing theory. Possibly in a book titled Battle of Britain by Patrick Bishop?? Unsure now.
That's pretty much true of any newspaper article these days because they're all behind paywalls. However, if you have a sub to any one of the News Corp tabloid dailies you can usually access all the others but not the Australian.
