Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Perth to London

Old 25th Jan 2019, 01:55
  #561 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 754
Surely someone must know the truth! Were any other services canx or delayed as a result if not having a FPL?
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 02:15
  #562 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In da Big Smoke
Posts: 2,333
Originally Posted by cessnapete View Post

Aren’t QF 787 Cat IIIC. No cloud base,100m vis as most LHR Operators?
You still need an alternate, which may have been the flight planning problem.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 02:34
  #563 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 571
I'm hearing that the new flight planning system (constellation) takes quite a bit of time to run each version of the plan.
Pure and utter uncorroborated scuttlebutt (this is a rumour network) is the flight planners don't have good visibility into the "internals" of the plan in progress to see where it is trending to add manual tweaks. Basically it spits out a complete plan. If the plan isn't suitable for whatever reason (read reduced payload), the planners have to completely re-run the plan (about 30 min) with the tweaks to see what pops out. Wash rinse and repeat.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 03:12
  #564 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 954
Bonuses all round then!
maggot is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 03:27
  #565 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 236
QF 787 is CAT3B (0' RA / 75m) and can make use of reduced alternate weather criteria to use alternates below standard alternate criteria but above CAT1 RVR/vis.
Tuner 2 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 04:40
  #566 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 78
If that was the case they'd reduce the payload, not cancel the flight!
Fathom,
Full tanks are full tanks, reducing payload/blocking seats doesn’t miraculously produce more fuel when the tanks are already full.
What I was implying, (perhaps a little too subtly), was that maybe with the enroute winds and TAF for arrival, full tanks was less than the min op fuel required, even with no pax/freight.
RD got it.

Last edited by Qanchor; 25th Jan 2019 at 04:52.
Qanchor is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 04:52
  #567 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: DeShire
Posts: 80
Itís not a question of aircraft capability. Itís the fuel policy and also flight time limitations.
If both Heathrow and Gatwick are below CAT 1 visibility you cannot take advantage of the reduced alternate weather criteria.
Unsurprinsingly during winter itís not uncommon for many airports to all be under CAT 1 visibility in the morning hours.
knobbycobby is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 08:51
  #568 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... Still!
Posts: 3,333
Originally Posted by Qanchor View Post

Full tanks are full tanks, reducing payload/blocking seats doesnít miraculously produce more fuel when the tanks are already full.
No, but the lower fuel burn produces more range. But you knew that already!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 10:05
  #569 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by knobbycobby View Post
Itís not a question of aircraft capability. Itís the fuel policy and also flight time limitations.
If both Heathrow and Gatwick are below CAT 1 visibility you cannot take advantage of the reduced alternate weather criteria.
Unsurprinsingly during winter itís not uncommon for many airports to all be under CAT 1 visibility in the morning hours.
Planning on a forecast that is 17 hours old when you arrive? In my airline on ULR flights plan for somewhere en route that is forecast to be above CAT l and reflightplan if possible with actuals nearest your planned destination?
cessnapete is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 10:15
  #570 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 78
So why didn’t the flight depart?
Qanchor is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 10:26
  #571 (permalink)  
When you live....
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 0.0221 DME Keyboard
Posts: 910
Originally Posted by cessnapete View Post


Planning on a forecast that is 17 hours old when you arrive? In my airline on ULR flights plan for somewhere en route that is forecast to be above CAT l and reflightplan if possible with actuals nearest your planned destination?
I think we've already established that for QF9/10 to work - its LHR or LGW only due to the disruption factor of going elsewhere - departing for an alternate and betting the sheep station on an improvement is very different to departing better than CAT1 and running the risk of a deterioration to the point that no CAT3B is possible (I'm not a flyer for a living - out of curiosity, what are the rules if an airfield goes below CAT1 when enroute for a ULR flight? Must re-plan including fuel to an alternate - enough fuel to miss then divert or, if not enough for that, must divert?)

Doesn't explain why it didn't depart though - the good ol'fashion rumour about a new flight planning software sounds pretty Qantas-like also.
UnderneathTheRadar is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 19:27
  #572 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 894
Originally Posted by UnderneathTheRadar View Post
I think we've already established that for QF9/10 to work - its LHR or LGW only due to the disruption factor of going elsewhere - departing for an alternate and betting the sheep station on an improvement is very different to departing better than CAT1 and running the risk of a deterioration to the point that no CAT3B is possible (I'm not a flyer for a living - out of curiosity, what are the rules if an airfield goes below CAT1 when enroute for a ULR flight? Must re-plan including fuel to an alternate - enough fuel to miss then divert or, if not enough for that, must divert?)

Doesn't explain why it didn't depart though - the good ol'fashion rumour about a new flight planning software sounds pretty Qantas-like also.
All airlines will have their own rules at replanning en route. From my experience in Uk and based at Lhr, vis lower than CatIII happens very infrequently, cloud base is not a factor. So unless there are long ATC delays you are guaranteed to land with the reliability of modern avionics. Most of the LR flights on my airline arrived between 0500 0700 as QF Perth, so no long ATC delays at that time, and of course 2 Cat III parallel landing runways available, 3 if you include LGW which is approx the same fuel from the arr Fix.

Last edited by cessnapete; 26th Jan 2019 at 10:44.
cessnapete is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 04:38
  #573 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 372
Here is a suggestion - perhaps they could plan a refuel stop somewhere like oh - I don't know - Dubai
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 04:59
  #574 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 173
Constellation is the problem.
Troo believer is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 05:34
  #575 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by Troo believer View Post
Constellation is the problem.

How can you blame Constellation? It calculates the fuel to 3 decimal places...
ruprecht is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 10:36
  #576 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 899
Originally Posted by Troo believer View Post
Constellation is the problem.
Capricorn is still there pumping out flight plans for other fleets... why canít they whip out a backup Capricorn plan?
Derfred is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 11:00
  #577 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tasmania and High Wollemi
Posts: 398
Originally Posted by Derfred View Post


Capricorn is still there pumping out flight plans for other fleets... why canít they whip out a backup Capricorn plan?
About 4 mins for a LHR - SYD fpl when OJA was being planned in Capricorn.
catseye is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.