Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Another Government Review of Aviation Cost & Regulation

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Another Government Review of Aviation Cost & Regulation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Oct 2016, 00:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,440
Received 222 Likes on 119 Posts
Another Government Review of Aviation Cost & Regulation

Yet another review of aviation regulation in Australia, or should we hope for real change this time?

The federal government will kick off a major review today to assess the forces destroying Australia’s once-vibrant general aviation sector, which is being strangled by red tape and onerous costs.
Nocookies | The Australian
tail wheel is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 00:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peace for out time!

Another look-busy project for the bureaucracy.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 01:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Another look-good project for the government
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 04:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: act
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell them to have a read of the latest CASA annual report. Check out page 179 - Senior Management Personnel Remuneration. It will give them an idea of where the money is going.

It's impressive, after CASA spend millions on a re-structure to streamline the middle and executive management and spending millions of dollars to do so, CASA has successfully changed the numbers of senior management from 34 managers in 2015, to 36 in 2016. To achieve this revolutionary change, 11 senior managers were dispatched, required an additional $1 000 000 in termination payments. Absolutely brilliant, Sir Humprey wouldbe proud of such an achievement.

When you realise that all of this was conceived by the same people that brought us the RRP, and Part 61, it's scarcely surprising what the outcome would have been
Vref+5 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 04:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It is 20 years since this was last done by BITRE. The report based on info provided by the industry does not inspire confidence in aviation industry business acumen. See: https://bitre.gov.au/publications/1996/report_095.aspx


Then, the claim was that CAA cost recovery and FAA charges were sending the industry broke. Total of all Government charges turned out to be 3 - 5% of operating costs.
Vag277 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 19:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can almost guess the outcome now. The government and CASA will be vindicated, costs and regulations will be found to be in line with other industries.

After all, who is instigating the enquiry. They'll get the answers they want.
27/09 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 08:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
Total of all Government charges turned out to be 3 - 5% of operating costs.
Yes but it is not just the DIRECT charges levied, it is the thousands of hours spent mindlessly meeting arbitrary requirements to please the regulator to enable an AOC operator to continue.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 09:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: ACT
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. All such opportunity costs need to be identified and costed to get the real impact.
Oldmanemu is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 09:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,296
Received 425 Likes on 212 Posts
Exactly. What is the dollar cost of AVMED's stress-causing and career-destroying delays, intrusions, restrictions and other interventions that are not justified on an objective or comparative risk basis?
Lead Balloon is online now  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 10:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know which would astonish me more:

That there is anyone left in the aviation sector who believes that another review is going to produce anything other than the hot air produced by the others in recent history (20 years).

That there is anyone in government who believes there is anyone left in the aviation sector who'll buy this bull****.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2016, 09:22
  #11 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,976
Received 102 Likes on 59 Posts
Slightly paraphrasing a scene from the old Pommy TV series Yes Minister.

"Minister; One never holds an enquiry (review) unless one already knows what the answer is!"
Pinky the pilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.