Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Results rumours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2016, 09:06
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Were Cobham operating here 21years ago?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 09:16
  #42 (permalink)  
BPA
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were as NJS.
BPA is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 20:32
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Were Cobham operating here 21years ago?
Cobham bought National Jet Systems which has privided services for Australian Airlines since 1990. We all know What happened to Australian Airlines, and I am talking about the original Australian Airlines so you could say National Jet Systems predates Qantas domestic.

By the way, National jet systems is still the employer of the pilots and holds the AOc.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2016, 01:36
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hicksville
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would Qantas consider the A320 to replace 737? Take in account for new type ratings, maintenance training etc, I thought they wanted to reduce the number of the types.
Something to do with having 100 A320's on order and nowhere to put them perhaps! I imagine the claimed 4000nm range of the 321 Neo has piqued some interest as well....
Xatrix is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2016, 02:00
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Xatrix
Something to do with having 100 A320's on order and nowhere to put them perhaps! I imagine the claimed 4000nm range of the 321 Neo has piqued some interest as well....
I don't see the sense in JQ operating a small fleet of 787s. It must be costing a bomb to crew and operate these aircraft, that are really orphans, while the vast majority of JQs fleet are Airbuss.

It would make sense to roll the 787-8s into the Qantas fleet along with the -9s arriving from next year. Let's face it, that's were they should have been in the first place to replace the 767s that are sorely missed domestically.

With the exception of HKT and HNL, I don't think there would be any routes the 787 does that couldn't be done with an A321. Why not make JQ entirely Airbus, CCQ 320/321 with all the associated efficiencies that brings. Increase the QF frequency to HNL and pick up HKT with the 330s in the short term then 787s.

Makes perfect sense. So of course will probably never happen.
IsDon is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2016, 08:21
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: home
Posts: 517
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Could somebody please explain to a dumb old fart why AJ would "purchase" Cobham airline operation ? He owns the routes, the check in staff, the ramp staff, the aircraft (or leases them), as far as I can tell the only thing he doesn't own is the tech crew, cabin crew, and engineers (ok, and the hangars in Adelaide but I'm pretty sure he already has 1 or 2 of those).
So what exactly would QF be buying ? Wait til the contract expires, say bye bye Cobham, and offer all the operational staff a job on Networks crappy conditions, voila !
airdualbleedfault is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2016, 20:06
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ALandDownUnder
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something to do with having 100 A320's on order and nowhere to put them perhaps! I imagine the claimed 4000nm range of the 321 Neo has piqued some interest as well....
Ah makes sence all those from Jetstars fails in Asia.

With the exception of HKT and HNL, I don't think there would be any routes the 787 does that couldn't be done with an A321. Why not make JQ entirely Airbus, CCQ 320/321 with all the associated efficiencies that brings. Increase the QF frequency to HNL and pick up HKT with the 330s in the short term then 787s.
What about Japan? And the new route into China?
log0008 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2016, 00:21
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by log0008
What about Japan? And the new route into China?
Maybe Qantas' shareholders have finally realised what Bruce Buchanan tried to tell them years ago. That long haul low cost models don't work.

If you limit JQs destinations to range to the 4000NM range of an A321then the model works. Especially with the efficiencies you get from a common fleet.

As for any destination outside this range that you mention, give it to Qantas mainline. Qantas mainline has been gifting routes to JQ for years. About time QF got some back.
IsDon is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2016, 02:02
  #49 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Over a period of a couple of months last year I compared QF and JQ loads to HNL. It wasn't particularly scientific as it was simply using the staff travel website but given the methodology was the same from both some conclusions can be drawn.

On days where the other didn't operate, JQ flights averaged 75% load factor whilst Qantas was at 90%. On the days where both flights operated JQ dropped to 55% whilst Qantas dropped to 75%.

Right aeroplane, right route? Doesn't look like it to me.
Keg is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2016, 21:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Qantas First Half Results

170 pilotsover 3 years. So Just over 55 a year. Let the games begin.
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2016, 21:37
  #51 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
It's not enough! That'll only cover pilots for the 787.

Last edited by Keg; 22nd Feb 2016 at 21:53.
Keg is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2016, 21:50
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar International...Unprofitable
Jetstar Asia...Unprofitable
Jetstar Pacific...Unprofitable
Jetstar Japan...Unprofitable
Jetstar Kiwi...Unprofitable
2 out of 5 aint bad I guess... And with almost 100% leased aircraft EBIT here is better than EBIT at Qantas.

Based on the supplementary slides
Jetstar International...Profitable record result despite $23m volcano impacts - 11 787s
Jetstar Asia...Profitable - 18 A320s
Jetstar Pacific...Unprofitable (offfset by Asia/Japan) - 12 A320/321s
Jetstar Japan...Profitable 1st time - 20 A320s
Jetstar Kiwi...Commenced (guessing unprofitable )
moa999 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2016, 21:53
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Aust
Posts: 188
Received 38 Likes on 19 Posts
I found the wording interesting. The press release states "170 in total, to the end of '19". Why so definitive?

The video press release seemed more open-ended.

I do agree that 170 still sounds like nowhere near enough.
SixDemonBag is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2016, 13:01
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moa999,
I can find "record result" for Jetstar International but no "profitable"
As there are no $ amounts like the QF numbers it is difficult to know.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2016, 14:18
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
If Jetstar International is making a profit, then why is Joyce considering transferring some of the B788's from his cherished love child to Qantas Domestic?
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2016, 00:17
  #56 (permalink)  
bdcer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Going Boeing,

Can you provide a source for that info? I know the original plan was for the 788s to go to Q when the 789s turned up.

wheels_down,

We can all suspect funny accounting, but that doesn't mean it's true. Do you have any proof? You certainly sound confident that it may be the case, & if so, you should really report it to the relevant authorities.
 
Old 24th Feb 2016, 00:33
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes on 32 Posts
bdcer

The rumour is 4 787-8's will be transferred to the QF side for domestic, to free up A330's for more international. The source comes from inside JQ. It's been around for while now, so I'll believe it when I see it.
SandyPalms is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2016, 01:29
  #58 (permalink)  
bdcer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Sandy. I'd also heard that Q may not 'take' the acft, but have Q pilots fly J* patterns to build experience on the 787.
 
Old 24th Feb 2016, 03:12
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,439
Received 219 Likes on 75 Posts
^^^ They will probably use Jetstar for the training since they already have the simulator and the approval as a 787 Type Rating provider.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2016, 04:32
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not Syderknee
Posts: 1,011
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
but have Q pilots fly J* patterns to build experience on the 787.
How dare the Q pilots steal the J pilots flying!
rmcdonal is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.