Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF Captain was feeling low...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2015, 12:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,292
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
We all have a bad day I suppose. Glad it wasn't me.
And there by the grace of God go all of us!
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 12:39
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TGG,
So I suppose they will dicipline the SO, demote the FO and congratulate the captain for outstanding CRM and saving the day?
You are so far off the mark with your supposition, you look silly to those who know what the outcome was.
Trent 972 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 12:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: You live where
Posts: 701
Received 65 Likes on 39 Posts
I have never seen a airport with so many carriers breaking MSA.

In the last three years Tiger a320, Jetstar A320, Thai twice, Malaysian, AirAsia a330 now QF 330.
Makes me wonder ...
missy is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 13:10
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,200
Received 35 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by wheels_down
I have never seen a airport with so many carriers breaking MSA.*

In the last three years Tiger a320, Jetstar A320, Thai twice, Malaysian, AirAsia a330 now QF 330.
Are you really 'breaking MSA' doing a daytime visual?

Manage that blood sugar.
maggot is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 13:30
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Trent 972

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 535
TGG,
Quote:
So I suppose they will dicipline the SO, demote the FO and congratulate the captain for outstanding CRM and saving the day?
You are so far off the mark with your supposition, you look silly to those who know what the outcome was.

You obviously don't know another scenario then where this happened
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 13:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Sounds like another QF 1 wake up call for QF management and rostering practices.
The pattern was hardly arduous, 24hrs in Singapore, then 31hrs in Perth!

Fitness for duty is up to the individual.
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 13:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 263
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Sounds like another QF 1 wake up call for QF management and rostering practices.
139 hours in the last 90 days for the PF, 131 hours for the PM. Half the workload or rostering practices of most of the competition. I think they'll be scratching to use the rosterung practices excuse!
Karunch is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 16:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.S.A
Age: 56
Posts: 497
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Setting 1000 (400 agl) in the fcu and then using open descent? Is this not frowned upon at QF?
oicur12.again is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 16:45
  #29 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Danger

Yes. Yes it is.
Keg is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 23:13
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
So I suppose they will dicipline the SO, demote the FO and congratulate the captain for outstanding CRM and saving the day?
...or maybe they didn't and why would they?

139 hours in the last 90 days for the PF, 131 hours for the PM. Half the workload or rostering practices of most of the competition.
Probably including assigned leave, blanklines and low divisors; no excuse for what happened but hardly the responsibility of the crew when their flying has been 'outsourced'.
C441 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 01:37
  #31 (permalink)  
prospector
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Qantas' head of flying operations, Mike Galvin, said the airline had reviewed its training procedures in light of the incident to highlight the importance of high levels of situation awareness during landing.
I really have a hard time trying to digest that. It has to be highlighted the" importance of high levels of situational awareness", and that comes from the Head of Flight Operations? and that after a review? What was the procedure prior to the review? a med to low level of situational awareness?
 
Old 10th Jul 2015, 01:51
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"We are no longer a legacy airline, we are a low cost one"

Food for thought
blueloo is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 11:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: S.O.E.
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a related matter - why do guys accept this visual SHEED arrival for 34 late at night after a long 4 sector day, and even more interesting why does CASA allow this.


An instrument approach might take another minute, but it's a lot safer proposition.


Go figure.
Dale Hardale is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 11:24
  #34 (permalink)  
34R
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 52
Posts: 238
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasn't in that flt deck and don't really know what transpired, but judging by the report I suspect not many 'Gates' were monitored, and more alarmingly I don't think anybody actually looked out the bloody window!
It's amazing what that picture can tell you should you take the time to look.

There is nothing overtly difficult about visual approaches into MEL, track shortening from Horus can get a little busy but if you're expecting it, as this crew appeared to, it ends up being done quite comfortably.

I'm staggered they got that out of shape.

As far as accepting a visual arrival from SHEED after 4 sectors, please tell me you're joking ��
34R is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 12:19
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: S.O.E.
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
34R - Read what I said: "late at night" after perhaps an 11 hour day. If you don't think fatigue might be an issue in this case, then I wouldn't want to be in the back of an aircraft you were in charge of.
Dale Hardale is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 12:25
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nowhere near Shinbone Waterhole
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
let's move on from the blame game and work together to make aviation a better and more enjoyable environment to work in!

You can make a good start by getting rid of low cost bogan carriers like, well, I can think of one in Oz....
mikedreamer787 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 13:23
  #37 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On a related matter - why do guys accept this visual SHEED arrival for 34 late at night after a long 4 sector day, and even more interesting why does CASA allow this.

An instrument approach might take another minute, but it's a lot safer proposition.


Go figure.
Because a request for a GNSS or VOR approach will oft be denied due sequencing. And a requirement for the same approach will occasionally require a phone call to a number provided on taxi after landing.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 13:33
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,471
Received 318 Likes on 118 Posts
You can make a good start by getting rid of low cost bogan carriers like, well, I can think of one in Oz....
Ohh please, get your head out of your ass and grow up. The low cost model has been in Australia for 15 years now, providing a much needed boost to the industry.

Aircraft are the modern day bus service, you're not flying around aristocrats anymore.

Just because it's low cost, it doesn't mean it's low safety.

morno
morno is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 13:43
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Just because it's low cost, it doesn't mean it's low safety.
Low cost, high cost.....

I think it's called affordable safety now. Or is it "worlds best practice"?

Basically whatever we can get away with until there is a death and/or Royal commission...
blueloo is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 14:40
  #40 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,178
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Morno,

I think the LCC mindset had been with Qantas since setting up Qantair in 1970, later in the 1970s offing fares from Sydney to London for just 79 pounds. Being a government subsidised airline they did not need to make a profit or pay for their own aircraft.
swh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.