Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Air NZ orders A320 and A321neo

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air NZ orders A320 and A321neo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jun 2014, 18:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air NZ orders A320 and A321neo

Air New Zealand is replacing its Airbus international aircraft with new models worth $1.6 billion as it refreshes its fleet.

In a deal announced this morning, the airline said it will buy 13 Airbus A320neo (new engine option) international planes and another A320 to join its domestic fleet.

Among the international planes are at least three A321neos which are part of the A320 family but have a stretched fuselage that can hold more passengers and fly further.

The aircraft will be used on Tasman and Pacific Island routes.

The announcement comes as the airline prepares for the arrival of the first of 10 widebody Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner planes for use on longhaul routes.

The A320neo aircraft will replace Air New Zealand's current fleet of 13 A320s which operate the majority of the airline's short-haul international services.

Equipped with new generation engines and fuel efficient swept up sharklet wing tips they are expected to deliver fuel savings of up to 15 per cent on the airline's existing A320s which first joined the fleet in 2003.

Air New Zealand chief executive Christopher Luxon signed the agreement with Airbus chief operating officer, customers, John Leahy at the International Air Transport Association's annual general meeting in Doha, Qatar, early today.

While the list price totals around $1.6 billion, the airline has received undisclosed discounts for the order.

Shareholder approval is not required as the value of the transaction is below the "relevant thresholds", the airline said.

Air New Zealand has two separate fleets of A320s, one with a 168-seat international configuration and one in domestic with 171 seats.

The domestic A320s are being phased in to replace ageing Boeing 737s.

The airline said A321neos have 38 more seats than the A320s which fly to Australia and the Pacific Islands.

The first A321neo is due in late 2017 with the remainder of the aircraft delivered at intervals through until 2019.

The additional A320 for the domestic fleet will be delivered early next year.

Luxon said the purchase was part of the aim of simplifying its fleet, a key part of its "Go Beyond" strategy of high growth.

"Operating one narrow body aircraft type will bring important efficiencies in training, maintenance and operating costs," he said.

Airbus said the A320neo family of aircraft is the world's best-selling single aisle aircraft.

The company already has some 2700 orders for A320neo models from 50 customers around the globe.

Big order

• Airbus A320neos are the latest generation of the popular single aisle jet
• Air NZ will buy 13 of the planes
• The stretched version can hold up to 220 passengers

Source NZ Hearld

Last edited by c100driver; 1st Jun 2014 at 19:03. Reason: Adding the source info
c100driver is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2014, 06:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A321neo type is a fair replacement of the 767-300s that they use on short runs to Australia and Pacific.
gate4 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2014, 10:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,678
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gate4
The A321neo type is a fair replacement of the 767-300s that they use on short runs to Australia and Pacific.
Some of the passengers might just dispute that....
I do, anyway.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2014, 16:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
be interesting to see where they send those 321s. may be a better fit on some routes than the 767. still, late 2017 is a while away. comparing a single aisle jet to a twin from a pax perspective maybe a little unfair, although tarq if your experience of the 321 is the 220 seat nightmares of jetstar i dont think airnz would be that silly
waren9 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2014, 20:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 81
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
I wonder is anybody else is thinking "how come Koru Airways is doing so well when the flying rat is doing so badly"?
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2014, 21:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,678
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by waren9
... comparing a single aisle jet to a twin from a pax perspective maybe a little unfair...
That's it.
(I also like the way the '76 leaps into the air, but from a pax p.o.v, that's in the 'cosmetic' category, I guess.)

No matter how it's configured, the seat room will be "snug", I guess.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2014, 23:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 150 Relative
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A321 the new 767?

I have only ever been on 1 A321, many years back in Europe, while the size difference was noticeable compared to the A320 on the previous leg, it certainly did not feel like a 767.

How to you fit almost the same number of pax from a 763 into what is a considerably smaller narrow body? Especially with the talk of business class on the 321. And at what penalty, if any? (range, comfort e.t.c)
scon is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 00:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The bush
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
The kiwi's will happily sit on a cardboard box if it has a sheepskin cover on it
The Banjo is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 01:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NZ
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a 767 replacement

Don't forget that these aircraft are to replace existing A320's. The replacement for the 763 is of course the 789.

It should close the gap nicely between the A320 at around 170 seats and the 789 at circa 300.

Seems ideal to me. 789 on the long haul flights were the 763 is barely palatable currently, or high density short haul when loads dictate. A320/21 for all other short haul.
donkey123 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 02:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear the 320 has landing weight limitations on sectors like Adelaide when an alternate is required and they have to limit pax nos. I'm guessing the 321 might be for these types of sectors.

I doubt the 321's would be to replace the 767's
27/09 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 06:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi All,

For those who are talking down the choice (bro) of the Airbus 320 NEO product, one needs to look at the fleet choice over the years that have been made and realise that the fleet planning has been given thought before the purchase. Currenlty it is just speculation on the routes the A321 is going to operate on. In my opinion, Qantas (Domestic) should follow suit and replace the older 73NG with the A321 that are slated for Jetstar. This would be a better product on short domestic runs to replace the B767 over the larger A330.

Air NZ product offered on the B777 is one of the best I've experienced. If they can replicate something similar on the A321, I think the PAX should be very happy.
Joe A350 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 07:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leadsled,

Did you get the right thread there. I'm not sure what the parlous (if you believe some on here) state of aviation safety in Oz has to do with AirNZ announcing a purchase of A320/321 NEO's.
27/09 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.