Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A company with money to burn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th May 2014, 08:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 101
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A company with money to burn

Surely this must just be bad reporting.

I get that an altercation happened on the flight and apparently there were assaults on three crew members - we obviously don't know all of the details and I don't want to speculate on that - I just hope they are all right.

What I don't get (assuming it's accurate reporting) is that this airline seems to have so much cash it can dead-head the flight back to Australia - and then probably send a 'spare' up to Bali to pick up the stranded passengers

Surely a new/supplemental crew could be sent

Abusive passenger leaves 267 Jetstar passengers stranded in Bali

Any details?
Bankstown Boy is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 09:00
  #2 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Supplementary crew sent from where? How? If it's a return flight the next day then the aeroplane is on the ground for 24 hours and misses the next flight it's supposed to operate. Perhaps that flight is BNE-DPS the next day?

Further, if you're waiting for supplementary crew then everyone is off to the pub anyway and delayed a bunch of hours.

These things happen on a semi regular basis.

What I want to know is what FRMS or airline risk analysis says that it's ok to depart MEL at 1800 and do a multi sector overnight arriving at 0600 the next morning?
Keg is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 09:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
easy keg. the one that says youre fit to crew the aircraft to a safe landing in mel but we're happy to buy you a taxi home because we acknowledge we have a duty of care to not let you drive home after such a duty.
waren9 is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 10:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Waren9

I've read that paragraph in the FRMS rules.

It's right before the chapter that says when one company determines that a multi sector back of the clock exceeds the level of risk the operator is prepared to accept due fatigue. It allows another subsidiary to operate the same multi sector back of the clock pairing cause the subsidiary has fuel efficient modern aircraft that operate in a different operating environment.

MC.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 10:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: melbourne
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so do that crew fly from Melbourne to Bali then on to Brisbane in one shift?
tery84vx is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 11:46
  #6 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Even if it's the F/As it's a crap tour of duty and defies logic.
Keg is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 14:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even if it's the F/As it's a crap tour of duty and defies logic
Yes, but its cheaper and more productive...and that really IS the first priority.



PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 21:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was pax on a Jetstar flight from Bali several years back, and became concerned at the cabin crew fatigue since the inbound flight from Melbourne was delayed. I lodged a complaint with CASA, but nothing transpired.

As I understood it, flight crew only fly one sector, but cabin crew do the round trip. I think it is a crushing shift, leaving Australia at 3pm and returning at 6.30am or later - what is the limit on duty times? With pre and post flight, surely this daily roster puts the cabin crew somewhere near 18 hours duty time?
juliusg is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 22:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,286
Received 39 Likes on 30 Posts
A "crushing shift"! Try working in a hospital emergency room or pulling 18 hour days continuously in the Navy at sea in a Sea State 5-6.......

The press walked past the fact that the bogans created the situation and it is happening more and more. One only has to look at the dress [or lack thereof] and manners at the terminals to see what's going on. Hardly Jetstar or Virgins or others fault. Bring back a minimum dress code would be a good start plus make them have a bath occasionally!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 22:48
  #10 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

Cabin crew don't have tour of duty limits. Sometimes there are limits in their respective agreements.

Let's be honest, an 18 hour tour of duty DFW- SYD with a horizontal crew rest available is a very different thing to MEL- DPS- BNE with no crew rest.
Keg is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 23:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Universe
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
TBM-Legend,

only a pilot would make light of an 18 hour, multi sector, back of clock F/A tour of duty [without horizontal crew rest] as being anything less than arduous.

You sir are clearly, a cretin.

Last edited by standard unit; 29th May 2014 at 23:22.
standard unit is offline  
Old 30th May 2014, 00:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Keg:-- our Cabin crew are subject to the same Flight and Duty Time limitations as Pilots.....surely QF cabin crew are to?
Have I misunderstood you?
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 30th May 2014, 01:37
  #13 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
fish

G'day nipticker. Nope. There are no Australian CAO limits for cabin crew. The Qantas LHCC EBA has some limitations in it and various means of extension to a commenced tour of duty but there are no aviation regulatory limits.

Hence you get some truly diabolical tours of duty for SIN based F/As- 3 sector 20 hours planned tour of duty according to a JQ A330 captain I spoke with recently.
Keg is offline  
Old 30th May 2014, 02:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,254
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
F/A's will be working to a CAO instrument in the near future that is based loosely on CAO 48.
Given CASA has been working to change the Regs for the past 25 years, then their definition of near future would be very different to your understanding of near future. Case in point, we are still working to the CAO48 exemption which was supposed to be done away with 12 months ago. Any JQ F/A's who will work under a CAO 48 style limit are probably not even born yet!
Lookleft is offline  
Old 30th May 2014, 03:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
That's all about to change. F/A's will be working to a CAO instrument in the near future that is based loosely on CAO 48.
Five years ago I was told by a senior CASA person that it was to be definitely implemented the following year….
compressor stall is online now  
Old 30th May 2014, 05:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,439
Received 219 Likes on 75 Posts
How do we know that there wasn't some reason that the Aircraft had to be back in Oz such as a maintenance requirement which could have expired before the 'new crew' could have been paxed up.
Ollie Onion is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.