Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Yes to night flights at Queenstown

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Yes to night flights at Queenstown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th May 2014, 23:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Off track, again
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes to night flights at Queenstown

Yes to night flights at Queenstown | Radio New Zealand News

Queenstown Airport is to introduce night flights after a two-year investigation to prove the safety case.
The Civil Aviation Authority has approved the proposal, which will require pilots to use satellite technology to fly in darkness through the Southern Alps.
The airport will need to widen its runway and install special lights on the mountains surrounding Queenstown.
But airport chief executive Scott Paterson said being able to fly in and out of Queenstown after dark was a game changer.
Currently in winter, planes have to take off by 5.30pm.
Mr Paterson said that did not work for skiers who wanted to return to Australia after a full day on the slopes.
"It aligns very clearly with the Tourism Industry Association goals of improving connectivity for New Zealand with the rest of the world. Currently you can get to one of the long haul hubs late in the evening but you can't get to Queenstown."
The cost of the plan will be $10 million. Airlines are now considering it.
aerostatic is offline  
Old 6th May 2014, 23:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
After driving via Cardrona over the crown range to Queenstown, I think I understand the problem.


I cant post my photo but I was standing at the lookout watching a Jetstar aircraft flying down the valley on approach to Queenstown.....below me.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 00:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does the resource management act or local council have anything to say about noise?
waren9 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 03:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,443
Received 222 Likes on 77 Posts
No resource consent or local council problems as the airport already has the consents to operate up until 22:00. This was more a process to convince CASA and the CAA that it is safe to operate in there after dark. The recommended infrastructure changes seem pretty sensible to me.

- widen to 45 m
- an approach lighting system to be installed
- off airport guidance lighting to be installed
- each operator to be individually approved
- specific pilots who have been trained within each approved airline.

They are saying the first commercial flights to be winter 2016.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 03:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
me too ollie
waren9 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 03:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I really fail to see any major problem here. Remember when we used to have diff Mins for day & night Ops years ago? They changed that as what's the diff between being in cloud with zero ref to outside as against night time (in cloud or otherwise)? Nothing.
Often it's easier to have the req'd Viz at night than it is in daytime.
Cairns is an Eg, we come damned close to high terrain in & out of that place, being doing so for years.
It's more about A/C performance than anything else.

Improving the dromes conditions will help reduce the risks but it won't stop man from flying into a mountain in a perfectly serviceable plane day or night!

Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 04:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,443
Received 222 Likes on 77 Posts
From a union point of you it was the visual manoeuvring (not approach or terrain on approach) required once visual that they were concerned about. NZAPLA wanted higher minima and some approach lighting for commercial night ops. These improvements go further that this which is good. Sometimes off the RNP you do require some aggressive movements to gain the profile, the more ques we have at night the better.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 04:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I understand that but there has always been some maneuvering involved in any NPA App some more than others but any ground Viz aids will be of more benefit.
I've flown into that joint in the good 'ole days, kept my eyes closed most of the time


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 23:21
  #9 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cost $10 million(estimate)

real cost is probably higher much higher & who wants to pay that ? Certainly not the airlines.


Apparently NZ ski numbers are down, way down on last year, told due to price increases.


In Brisbane Sunday mail Escape section Flight Centre has a full page advert on last page.


It says Queenstown return from only $763 (nothing included except taxes) & that supposed to be a deal.


On same page it says LAX for $1091. I actually rang & they said that was for Fiji Airways, but Qantas, Virgin, Delta only $100-$200 more around same time.


People must look at that & say only $300 more to LAX return. No wonder NZ numbers are down.
XPT is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 23:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Wally, have you actually seen the approach into Queenstown? Flying down a valley without room to turn.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=cNCQlCgb0SQ
Sunfish is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 02:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 170 Likes on 87 Posts
Flying down a valley without room to turn
Why would you want to turn?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 02:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'Sunny' I have seen a couple of YouTube Vids on Queenytown (great to observe) & as I mentioned have actually flown into there a couple of times but not in the 'Bus' on that App.

Sure it's a higher risk App than most but the plane doesn't know that it's just the drivers behind the steering wheels:-)

As I have mentioned b4 it's more about A/C perf than anything else where the risk is.

Anyway with 2day's modern tech stuff this shouldn't be rocket science at all, it's more risk assessment stuff.


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 07:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 405
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The move to nighttime RNP approaches at Queenstown is a sensible development.

RNP by day has proved its worth over a number of years and I know of no reason why it shouldn't be just as successful once the sun goes down.

The airport will require considerable upgrading before night ops can start, and some of these improvements (runway widening for example) can only make daytime ops even safer.

There will still be occasions when aircraft can't get in because of weather. The problem usually is not the cloud base but turbulence preventing stabilised approaches. There was such a day last week when I think there were more missed approaches and diversions than landings.
On Track is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 09:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lots of money for what benefit ? Flights to ZQN from OZ will be cut next year, due to large drop in demand & Australian fed budget cuts.
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 11:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,096
Received 483 Likes on 130 Posts
I think if you lived in NZQN the reason would be quite obvious.....especially if you owned a business. The business owners don't care how much the tickets cost, they just need the numbers to keep growing ( as they have) so that they sell more of their products ( hamburgers, pizza, coffee, panadol etc etc etc).
framer is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 12:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 45
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stop being so soft ! You've clearly not seen the approachs into Innsbruck and Chambery.
Ex Cargo Clown is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 00:23
  #17 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
airport open more hours doesn't mean more flights, it may just mean flights are more spread out.


For flights to take off in evening means they must fly in at that time as well (no airline wants aircraft to sit on ground for more than ~30 mins, especially at QN where they might get stuck if weather comes in).


Who wants to arrive at ZQN at 1900 ? (except maybe a few kiwis from AKL, WLG or CHC) departing after work that day. Does help departures from Australia.


It would help delays though. At present I think aircraft MUSt depart 45 mons prior to sunset. If eg. a delay at OZ end, aircraft could still take off with knowledge of no effective curfew.
XPT is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 04:10
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 405
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
XPT, I'm not so sure about that.

In summer flights are still happening at 8pm local. Local business people complain that in winter they can't do a full day's work in Auckland or Wellington and get back home the same day.

And spreading out the international arrivals would be a good thing. On weekends in the ski season the airport gets quite congested as all the flights from Australia arrive within a short period during the afternoon.

BNE1320, passenger numbers to ZQN have been growing steadily for years now, especially international passengers, who are not necessarily Australian. Why do you think there will suddenly be a big drop in demand?
On Track is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 05:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: AUS
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with "On Track". This is one of the most studied ports with arguably the most risk management assessments of similar airports.
HeSaidWhat is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 08:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yep a crock of BS.

As Wally says the Aircraft doesn't know it's dark and in cloud!!

Just more OHS crap.
nitpicker330 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.