Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Truths according to CAPA

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Truths according to CAPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Feb 2014, 08:34
  #21 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

Trent

A380 second officers make far too much money for what they do (no offence, this is not personal...
......is a very different statement to.....

what you are saying is akin to "let's shaft the S/Os so we can keep our pay".
In fact, they're so different that I'm surprised that you've gone down that road.

Let me give you an example:

what you are saying is akin to "let's shaft the S/Os so we can keep our pay".
What you are saying is that you're happy to continue screwing over F/Os who have more responsibility, work more duty hours and more flying hours in a bid period for 20% less pay than the A380 S/Os.

What you're saying is that you're happy to see some S/Os out of a job and F/Os demoted so that other S/Os can keep taking home exorbitant amounts.

See how the game is played?
Keg is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 09:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg, you know damn well there is not on any fleet, any S/O who is paid at a higher hourly rate than the most junior F/O, (ie. the most senior 380 S/O get a lower hourly rate than the most junior 767 F/O), and likewise their is not an F/O who is paid at a higher hourly rate than the most junior Captain.
What you are playing games with is the overtime component that 380/747 S/O's get for operating Long Haul..
Are you saying people shouldn't be paid accordingly for the hours/overtime they work?
Trent 972 is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 10:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Remember that the SO rate is a fixed percentage of the Captain rate. If the SOs get paid too much on the 380 then that says a lot for what the Captains and FOs are getting paid on that type.

Fix the amount Captains get paid and the SO pay will fix itself.

Overtime should have disappeared years ago. Senior crew going to Dallas, LAX - insert senior destination here - already get the benefit of higher density to get more days off. There's no reason they should be getting up to an extra 50 hours a BP - close to 30% extra dough on a 160 hr divisor - for sitting in the crew rest for 7 hours DFW-BNE or LAX-MEL. Pay them for the hours they fly, ie. retain the current pattern credits, but ditch the ADP.

And don't give me the "long haul flying's hard so the extra money is for that" line.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 10:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'll just pick up on another point in CAPA's article that REALLY gives me the ****s every time I hear it.

...an end of the line legacy carrier like Qantas.
It's not an "end of the line"...to think so is terribly old thinking and ignores the Sth American growing markets! (World Cup Soccer & Olympics coming too)
Tell me, you have the B747's (coz yuh didn't order B777's), so why not deploy them where others can not go??? ...over the pole to Chile/Brazil/Argentina and Sth Africa, heck so many markets to tap into from Mexico all the way south! Expand what few are currently done and exploit your 4-engined market advantage!
All goes back to management & fleet decisions again.
Chocks Away is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 12:16
  #25 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

What you are playing games with is the overtime component that 380/747 S/O's get for operating Long Haul..
Are you saying people shouldn't be paid accordingly for the hours/overtime they work?
An A380 s/o on a 175hr divisor will do approx 180 hours tour of duty, 140-150 stick, spend.at least 40 hours in the bunk or on a break and make about 40ish hours of overtime. A 767 F/O on a 175 divisor will do 230-240 hours tour of duty, 145-155 hours stick, spend about 210+ hours on the flight deck with the remaining time lost on long transits between sectors. The A380 S/O will earn approximately 40-50K more per annum. The 767 driver will do more time in a control seat on a BNE- DRW- BNE for nil ADP than a S/O will SYD- DXB. You don't see an issue here? You don't see a problem looking for a solution? You don't think this doesn't adversely affect all of us? You don't think this doesn't contribute to the demise of the long haul pilot group?

Direct anywhere is on the money. Overtime came in when it involved flying arduous multi sector tours of duty and in the classic, little time off. Do you think it's now been distorted just a tad from what was originally intended? Do you reckon that an overtime bill to the tune of approx $70 mill per annum is sustainable let alone justifiable?

This is not an attack on S/Os. It's a cry to stop deluding yourself that there isn't a problem that needs fixing for a multitude of different reasons.
Keg is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 12:30
  #26 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,884
Received 156 Likes on 50 Posts
Keg, for those of us not in Qantas could you explain what is a divisor?
SOPS is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 13:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A divisor is the number of credited hours per 56 days ( eight weeks)
Credited hours per trip is the greater of stick hours or 5.30 hrs per day.( more or less)
Tankengine is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2014, 13:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post removed because I take no joy in arguing with Keg. I know him to be a good and decent bloke.
We'll just have to disagree on this subject.
ps. I'm right though.

Last edited by Trent 972; 26th Feb 2014 at 14:16.
Trent 972 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.