Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Fires lit on Etihad flight

Old 20th Feb 2014, 23:43
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 14
Posts: 1,517
Gives you pause for thought over our national carriers risk assessment of the minimal number of fire extinguishers on board....

Does anyone know what Etihad have on board other than the heat activated toilet extinguishers? Do the have both water and BCf (or equivalent?)
blueloo is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2014, 23:56
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the couch
Posts: 59
Somewhat unusual that

1) The airline allowed the flight to proceed with all pax from CGK onwards.
2) The Captain chose to continue the flight from CGK with all pax.
3) Access to the toilets was only restricted after the last fire was set.

Very cavalier (or amateurish) attitude towards aircraft safety on the part of Etihad.
wild goose is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 00:02
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Reports that up to 12 passengers detained for questioning

Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
moa999 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 00:30
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 52
Back again?
defizr is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 03:00
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,737
Reports that bottled water was used at some point? Did they exhaust the extinguishers?


I've suggested before that there should be access points to the aircraft's water tanks so crew can plug in a hose with a nozzle or spray/mist wand.




mickjoebill
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 07:30
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 3,840
toilet extinguishers

How long would it take to replace/replenish the extinguishers at a diversion port?

If not possible, then assuming the MEL says none required for dispatch, that's a big call to continue knowing you have a firebug onboard.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 08:36
  #47 (permalink)  
tfx
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 13
The law follows the state of registry. Something to remember if you are traveling foreign.

Cabin fires? Uncontained? You've got 25 minutes to get out of the air.
tfx is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2014, 13:22
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the ground
Posts: 337
Originally Posted by Wild Goose
Somewhat unusual that
...
3) Access to the toilets was only restricted after the last fire was set.
That's a bit like saying it's unusual that you found your missing keys the last place you looked.

According to The Australian newspaper, "lighters and matches were confiscated in Jakarta before passengers were let back on the flight"

Presumably the aircraft was also searched for lighters and matches, but even so, it seems quite extraordinary that in the face of clear evidence that an actual (not merely potential) arsonist with a faulty or absent sense of self preservation was amongst the passengers, the flight continued with the culprit(s) aboard.

You could argue there was little else they could do but continue on, since they were unable to identify the culprit(s), but this seems to fly in the face of the disruption routinely caused by minor security breaches (Melbourne Airport's spokeswoman's phrase, not mine) at airports with no evidence at all of any malicious intent.

Seriously, it's OK to strand thousands for a few hours because someone turned their back on a door for 30 seconds, but it's not OK to strand several hundred people when you KNOW one of them has made several attempts to set fire to a long haul aircraft which is about to fly hours from land, because you don't know which one it was?
nonsense is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 22:48
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the couch
Posts: 59
Nonsense
Regarding your reference to point number 3:

The intention is that the access to the toilets wasn't restricted immediately after the take off from Jakarta.
This should have been the captains solution assuming that he had no other choice but to proceed with the flight from there, and assuming that the identity of the arsonist was not even suspected at that point.

Instead the toilets weren't monitored or restricted after departing Jakarta and everyone just sat there waiting for this clown to have another go
wild goose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.