Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

A380 flapless landing Auckland 22DEC

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A380 flapless landing Auckland 22DEC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 08:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 flapless landing Auckland 22DEC

G'day

EK406 did a flapless landing at AKL this afternoon after they declared they were not able to be extended. The chap on the radio said they would have a high approach speed and may require full length of 23L to roll out.

Just wondering what sort of Vref a A380 with 527pob might have for a flapless landing?

Anyone have that sort of info handy?

Cheers


S2k
Sqwark2000 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 08:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
165 to 170ish depending of weight.
donpizmeov is online now  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 08:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gate_15L
Age: 50
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
165 to 170ish depending of weight.
Fairly impressive for a aircraft of that size, considering the NG has a fairly similar sort of target speed for a Trailing Edge Flap Up landing..

Pulled it off by A10 to boot.. with no hint of a brake fire....
Gate_15L is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 08:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is even more impressive is the typical FAS crossing the threshold at about 120kts...
underfire is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 09:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is even more impressive is the typical FAS crossing the threshold at about 120kts...
Why? This is merely the result of good aerodynamics, wing design and modern manufacturing techniques.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 09:34
  #6 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 1,480
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Why? This is merely the result of good aerodynamics, wing design and modern manufacturing techniques.
20 acres of wing
601 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 09:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,293
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Would be unusual to be totally flap less wouldn't it?

There are flaps and slats and leading edge devices everywhere on those things.

What failure would take out all of them?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 10:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PM,

Would have to agree!

The engineering hit the sweet spot with this ac...

EDit: Vref is 20kts slower than a 777
underfire is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 11:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: World
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Link from Flightradar24:
Flightradar24.com - Live flight tracker!
Kubalson is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 11:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who said he lost both Slats AND Flaps?
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 15:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
probably right nitpicker, flaps/slats separate so would normally not lose both same as earlier buses.
bvcu is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 17:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, I am not a transport category pilot and this is my first post here.

What issues might there be with deployment of just the slats and no flaps? Any unusual pitch attitude or other things to be considered?
ThreeThreeMike is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 18:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
The engineering hit the sweet spot with this ac...
Pity the aesthetics designers didn't!
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 18:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
A380 wing was designed for a (future) stretch and is hence oversized for the -800 model.
tdracer is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2013, 20:34
  #15 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What issues might there be with deployment of just the slats and no flaps? Any unusual pitch attitude or other things to be considered?
No significant negative issues on a 717. For example, at MLW: flaps & slats up Vref is 197, slats only Vref is 154, and slats + flap 40 Vref is 137.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 04:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Florence
Age: 75
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil pitch attitudes

If Clarrie and his mates could fly without the autopilot and flight director, I'm sure that they would notice that the pitch attitudes down finals would be quite different between a clean wing, slats only and normal landing configuration...


If I'm wrong, I'm sure he'll tell me and quote the pitch attitudes at Vref for each configuration quoted!
Prince Niccolo M is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 04:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
33M,

The approach speed is increased to Vref plus 30ish to keep the nose a bit lower for approach and landing to improve tail strike margain for landing. So the attitude would be around 7 degrees nose up instead of the normal 2.5 degrees nose up on finals. Only a little flare would be needed.
Brake to vacate won't work, so a normal autobrake setting would be used.

The don
donpizmeov is online now  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 05:36
  #18 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gee thanks Prince, I'd not have known about a different pitch attitude but for this thread!
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 06:39
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
EDit: Vref is 20kts slower than a 777
Than a 300ER, but then it has a MTOW 100 tonnes and a MLW 50 tonnes heavier then the original -200.

How much heavier would the later A380 models have been if the aircraft hadn't been a colossal manufacturing failure?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2013, 06:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much heavier would the later A380 models have been if the aircraft hadn't been a colossal manufacturing failure?
OUCH!!!!! thems harsh words.
27/09 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.