MERGED: Alan's still not happy......
Thanks Fed Sec. I've spent years reading MEL's and discussing things with Engineers and even I get a little lost.
I would hope people reading this who aren't of an aviation background would realise that vastly powerful engines that each burn 10,000kgs of fuel per hour on takeoff (40,000kgs total) need to be bolted on to the wing properly. This type of thing on a 400 seat airliner (even if that airliner might not need maintenance) is absolutely unacceptable on any level.
This is NOT about 'militant unionists' - this is about highly technical machines needing highly technically accurate maintenance.
Outsourcing can be fantastic, but if you outsource to the point you lose the ability to 'police' that outsourcing, then you have a major problem.
Big things that spin very fast go bang very quickly. I've put my life in Steve's hands about twice a week for the last 28 years. If Steve isn't happy with something I am expected to fly then I certainly am not happy.
I trust him with my life - so should anyone reading this. There is a big difference between 'militant unionism' and 'professionalism'. Make sure you understand the difference.
I would hope people reading this who aren't of an aviation background would realise that vastly powerful engines that each burn 10,000kgs of fuel per hour on takeoff (40,000kgs total) need to be bolted on to the wing properly. This type of thing on a 400 seat airliner (even if that airliner might not need maintenance) is absolutely unacceptable on any level.
This is NOT about 'militant unionists' - this is about highly technical machines needing highly technically accurate maintenance.
Outsourcing can be fantastic, but if you outsource to the point you lose the ability to 'police' that outsourcing, then you have a major problem.
Big things that spin very fast go bang very quickly. I've put my life in Steve's hands about twice a week for the last 28 years. If Steve isn't happy with something I am expected to fly then I certainly am not happy.
I trust him with my life - so should anyone reading this. There is a big difference between 'militant unionism' and 'professionalism'. Make sure you understand the difference.
Don Quixote Impersonator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
V-jet,
In my personal experience, not with airline, but light to heavy corporate over the years I can think of dozens and dozens of instances where SDRs were a complete waste of time and when absolute physical and documentary evidence of clear MRO fraudulent certification of work simply not performed.
CASA simply squibbed.
I am not talking about the Australian airline engineers here.
Fortunately most have gone out of business but not as a result of any CASA action.
In one instance they had no option but to ground a fleet of light charter twins after a mistake by the MRO annual reporting less hours on the airframes one year than the previous years. 5 sets of engines with multiple overhauls by biro and so on. It's the old story when you tell a lie you have to have a really good memory to perpetuate it. Prosecuted, not as I recall. But they start the race to the bottom on rates.
We didn't use them nor would we have anything to do with aircraft that were.
Having said that LAME's are as a profession, very honest professionals also frustrated by losing work and suffering depressed incomes because the dodgy bros are allowed to flourish.
Definitely a case of crawling all over the good guys, because they are easy targets and ignoring or too frightened to take on the not so good ones.
Price is the driver and I'm sure you agree there ain't such a thing as cheap safety in maintenance terms.
I repeat the old maxim if you think safety is expensive try having an accident.
It goes right back to the days of horse travel, "for want of a nail the shoe was lost"...........you know the rest of it.
In my personal experience, not with airline, but light to heavy corporate over the years I can think of dozens and dozens of instances where SDRs were a complete waste of time and when absolute physical and documentary evidence of clear MRO fraudulent certification of work simply not performed.
CASA simply squibbed.
I am not talking about the Australian airline engineers here.
Fortunately most have gone out of business but not as a result of any CASA action.
In one instance they had no option but to ground a fleet of light charter twins after a mistake by the MRO annual reporting less hours on the airframes one year than the previous years. 5 sets of engines with multiple overhauls by biro and so on. It's the old story when you tell a lie you have to have a really good memory to perpetuate it. Prosecuted, not as I recall. But they start the race to the bottom on rates.
We didn't use them nor would we have anything to do with aircraft that were.
Having said that LAME's are as a profession, very honest professionals also frustrated by losing work and suffering depressed incomes because the dodgy bros are allowed to flourish.
Definitely a case of crawling all over the good guys, because they are easy targets and ignoring or too frightened to take on the not so good ones.
Price is the driver and I'm sure you agree there ain't such a thing as cheap safety in maintenance terms.
I repeat the old maxim if you think safety is expensive try having an accident.
It goes right back to the days of horse travel, "for want of a nail the shoe was lost"...........you know the rest of it.
If my reading of your post is correct, then, I'm not sure CASA is the issue per se, but an airline who's word and practices were 'the best' are now not so. What I personally find highly objectionable is that the 'gold standard' hasn't been so much lowered as all understanding of what it was and what it entailed has totally been lost on the people who run the joint.
Thanks for the expanded detail and clarification FEDSEC.
This situation is a national disgrace and a disaster waiting to happen.
Thanks for putting yourself in the firing line for all of us at the sharp end.
This situation is a national disgrace and a disaster waiting to happen.
Thanks for putting yourself in the firing line for all of us at the sharp end.
If the AMM allows for fitment of a single washer, why is the fact that the bolts were installed accordingly a problem? It appears that two of the three engines "wrongly" installed were actually installed in accordance with the maintenance manual. The third appears to be a f$&k up.
Just curious as to why this is an issue for those two engines that appear to have been installed in accordance with the maintenance manual so a serious question, not s$&tstirring. Thanks.
Just curious as to why this is an issue for those two engines that appear to have been installed in accordance with the maintenance manual so a serious question, not s$&tstirring. Thanks.
Directanywhere,
The stuffup with the offending washers was that they were COUNTERSUNK washers installed UPSIDE DOWN. This then creates stress raisers under the HIGH TENSILE boltheads,which eventually leads to cracks and ultimately,bolt FAILURE.
Pretty sure you or the pax don't want to see a 5 plus ton engine bouncing down the runway just on rotate or even worse departing the aircraft from 35000ft.
McHale.
The stuffup with the offending washers was that they were COUNTERSUNK washers installed UPSIDE DOWN. This then creates stress raisers under the HIGH TENSILE boltheads,which eventually leads to cracks and ultimately,bolt FAILURE.
Pretty sure you or the pax don't want to see a 5 plus ton engine bouncing down the runway just on rotate or even worse departing the aircraft from 35000ft.
McHale.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The issue isn't really about bolts, washers, overseas facilities or where maintenance is done. This is about CASA blatantly lying about an issue they knew everything about to make it look like I had misled the Senate.
The lying **** Peter Gibson appears to have told ABC that the only issue was with one bolt on one engine.
The ATSB had received a letter from CASA explaining the problems with mounting spread across a number of engines and varying problems.
They knew all about this. What would motivate them to lie to the press??? Are they so ****en stupid to think that we don't keep records? I am so angry that this mob that are meant to be our Regulator can be so untrustworthy.
The lying **** Peter Gibson appears to have told ABC that the only issue was with one bolt on one engine.
The ATSB had received a letter from CASA explaining the problems with mounting spread across a number of engines and varying problems.
They knew all about this. What would motivate them to lie to the press??? Are they so ****en stupid to think that we don't keep records? I am so angry that this mob that are meant to be our Regulator can be so untrustworthy.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question should be "What's driving the regulator to make such statements when evidence to the contrary is clearly there, and who's driving the regulator to do that?"
Fed Sec:
Im so f&&&&en angry that it NEEDS a regulator to even be involved. This is iconic Qantas, not a tin pot GA startup! Like ASIC with corporate fraud (another 'totally unrelated' subject) if you rely on them in real life to head off problems then you will get caught. They are only (in my experience) helpful in hindsight when something has already gone wrong and they are forced to act, or be seen to have acted.
I completely understand your anger. I dont know how you deal with it so calmly. I would be reaching across tables strangling people.
Ive dealt with ASIC and they are Council workers who want to get home each day with as little on their desks as possible for the next day.
There is nothing wrong with the rules, just they are not policed.
CASA seems like ASIC.
That does not surprise me. What now surprises me is how accepting I have become with the 'regulators' inaction. You are absolutely correct to point out how wrong that attitude is.
Im so f&&&&en angry that it NEEDS a regulator to even be involved. This is iconic Qantas, not a tin pot GA startup! Like ASIC with corporate fraud (another 'totally unrelated' subject) if you rely on them in real life to head off problems then you will get caught. They are only (in my experience) helpful in hindsight when something has already gone wrong and they are forced to act, or be seen to have acted.
I completely understand your anger. I dont know how you deal with it so calmly. I would be reaching across tables strangling people.
Ive dealt with ASIC and they are Council workers who want to get home each day with as little on their desks as possible for the next day.
There is nothing wrong with the rules, just they are not policed.
CASA seems like ASIC.
That does not surprise me. What now surprises me is how accepting I have become with the 'regulators' inaction. You are absolutely correct to point out how wrong that attitude is.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They knew all about this. What would motivate them to lie to the press??? Are they so ****en stupid to think that we don't keep records? I am so angry that this mob that are meant to be our Regulator can be so untrustworthy
V-Jet nails it
I've dealt with ASIC and they are Council workers who want to get home each day with as little on their desks as possible for the next day.
There is nothing wrong with the rules, just they are not policed.
CASA seems like ASIC.
There is nothing wrong with the rules, just they are not policed.
CASA seems like ASIC.
Originally Posted by Shark Patrol
The two things they were talking about here were "P&L" - profit and loss - versus cash flow. What Evans was saying was that the routes still being flown by QF International are cash flow positive (meaning the flights are making money), but that QF International are doing badly on profit and loss. So, by extrapolation, the flights are making some profit, but not enough to counter the losses that are being made elsewhere - maintenance costs or labour costs, by inference. What the senators weren't cluey enough to ask was where QF International was losing money and whether Jetstar cost-shifting was taking place.
The two things they were talking about here were "P&L" - profit and loss - versus cash flow. What Evans was saying was that the routes still being flown by QF International are cash flow positive (meaning the flights are making money), but that QF International are doing badly on profit and loss. So, by extrapolation, the flights are making some profit, but not enough to counter the losses that are being made elsewhere - maintenance costs or labour costs, by inference. What the senators weren't cluey enough to ask was where QF International was losing money and whether Jetstar cost-shifting was taking place.
What now surprises me is how accepting I have become with the 'regulators' inaction. You are absolutely correct to point out how wrong that attitude is
There must be someone in this country who can order a forensic study into the accounts at Qantas for example.. or force CASA to come clean etc. other than going through countless Senate inquiries that never get much coverage and always end up going nowhere.
On the upside, what has changed, the mainstream media almost daily now are calling for AJ to quit.
And in the background, calls are growing louder for Alan Joyce to quit as the airline's long serving chief executive.
The Irish born Australian citizen - who controversially grounded the entire Qantas fleet in late 2011 in his fight with unions - is vowing to stay on.
Mr Joyce once joked in his first ABC interview as Qantas boss back in 2008 that he took a "hospital pass" from his tough talking predecessor Geoff Dixon.
The question now is whether any corporate warrior would have the nerve and stamina to take a hospital pass from Mr Joyce.
Qantas: What's the future for the flying kangaroo? - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
The Irish born Australian citizen - who controversially grounded the entire Qantas fleet in late 2011 in his fight with unions - is vowing to stay on.
Mr Joyce once joked in his first ABC interview as Qantas boss back in 2008 that he took a "hospital pass" from his tough talking predecessor Geoff Dixon.
The question now is whether any corporate warrior would have the nerve and stamina to take a hospital pass from Mr Joyce.
Qantas: What's the future for the flying kangaroo? - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
I don't know how you deal with it so calmly.
What's the future for the Flying Kangaroo? - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A forensic audit of the Qantas books will not work. The accountants wouldn't know where to look and it is too easy for Qantas to hide ****. When they were getting close, they give them Chairman's lounge memberships and presto, they come out giving them a clean bill of health.
Qantas offered this via the ACTU last year and AIPA and ALAEA said no worries but we want one of our nominated Reps present the entire time to make sure the accountants understood the areas to look in. Qantas would not allow this forensic investigation to take place with anyone with any aviation knowledge there.
Qantas offered this via the ACTU last year and AIPA and ALAEA said no worries but we want one of our nominated Reps present the entire time to make sure the accountants understood the areas to look in. Qantas would not allow this forensic investigation to take place with anyone with any aviation knowledge there.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty sure you or the pax don't want to see a 5 plus ton engine bouncing down the runway just on rotate
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ansett found a couple of problems with the 767's in 2000 & 2001, fixed them & self reported. The fleet was grounded by CASA - twice! QF seems to have a growing number of issues that are at least as serious as those, but has never had even one aircraft grounded by CASA.
What has changed? Is CASA a different beast these days? Does QF have some sort of control over them? Is there political interference? Or is the 'National Carrier' simply untouchable?
What has changed? Is CASA a different beast these days? Does QF have some sort of control over them? Is there political interference? Or is the 'National Carrier' simply untouchable?
CASA doesn't have the competency, let alone the balls, to ever find fault with Qantas.
Pilot mate talked about one of CASA'a surviellance efforts - when shown some systems and data, they couldn't even understand what they were looking at, let alone analyze and critique what was happening.
CASA is happier beating up GA children. (cue "The Bold Gendarmes")
Pilot mate talked about one of CASA'a surviellance efforts - when shown some systems and data, they couldn't even understand what they were looking at, let alone analyze and critique what was happening.
CASA is happier beating up GA children. (cue "The Bold Gendarmes")
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne
Age: 54
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems some bond traders understand why Alan’s not happy.
Source:Qantas Risk Tops Air France-KLM on Plan Doubts: Australia Credit - Bloomberg
Doubts over Qantas Airways Ltd. (QAN)’s plan to stem losses pushed bond risk for Australia’s biggest carrier above that of Air France-KLM Group, which is attempting a turnaround from near bankruptcy.
Credit-default swaps protecting against non-payment of Qantas’s debt have risen by 48 basis points since Feb. 28 to 300 on March 13, the highest level since November 2012. Risk for Air France-KLM fell to a three-year low on March 7 as the carrier’s Chief Executive Officer Alexandre de Juniac, who said it had been “heading to bankruptcy," refocused on premium fliers.
Credit-default swaps protecting against non-payment of Qantas’s debt have risen by 48 basis points since Feb. 28 to 300 on March 13, the highest level since November 2012. Risk for Air France-KLM fell to a three-year low on March 7 as the carrier’s Chief Executive Officer Alexandre de Juniac, who said it had been “heading to bankruptcy," refocused on premium fliers.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems some bond traders understand why Alan’s not happy
“If revenue keeps falling the profit margin might remain very similar despite all the cost cuts,” Raymond Lee, who helps manage about A$6.5 billion at the Sydney-based fund, said by phone. “There hasn’t been any real positive news about the underlying business.”
Annual revenue at the 93-year-old carrier will fall this year for just the fourth time since 1993, according to the median of 12 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.
Losing Control
Qantas will have to borrow money to pay for planes and other capital spending during the year through June due to negative free cash flow, chief executive Alan Joyce forecast Dec. 5. The measure, which shows how much cash is left over from sales once operating costs and capital spending have been paid, has only been positive in one year since Joyce took over in November 2008, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Annual revenue at the 93-year-old carrier will fall this year for just the fourth time since 1993, according to the median of 12 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.
Losing Control
Qantas will have to borrow money to pay for planes and other capital spending during the year through June due to negative free cash flow, chief executive Alan Joyce forecast Dec. 5. The measure, which shows how much cash is left over from sales once operating costs and capital spending have been paid, has only been positive in one year since Joyce took over in November 2008, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
What happened to the trading environment? - YouTube
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...1226856359418#
Last edited by TIMA9X; 17th Mar 2014 at 02:24. Reason: add link
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South of the Equator
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ALAEA Sec at Qantas Senate Inquiry
I have copied the ALAEA Sec and Joyce at the Senate Inquiry into Qantas but didn't display it until now as I thought it may have been copied from the APAC Channel (Foxtel) by some one else. I missed out on copying the others as I turned it on too late. So, I believe TIMEX has already shown Joyce, so here is Steve P.:
Watching...
Why is it Fed Sec is pushed for answers, yet BGA supplies none of substance?
Its like there are two different sets of Senators.
Just think how Fed Sec would have been pilloried if he had answered questions the way BGA didn't. Talk about man who knows what he's talking about vs someone who knows nothing about what he's talking about.
--------------
Jesus Christ! Amazing work and depth of knowledge Fed Sec. This STILL hasn't been looked at seriously!!!!
Why is it Fed Sec is pushed for answers, yet BGA supplies none of substance?
Its like there are two different sets of Senators.
Just think how Fed Sec would have been pilloried if he had answered questions the way BGA didn't. Talk about man who knows what he's talking about vs someone who knows nothing about what he's talking about.
--------------
Jesus Christ! Amazing work and depth of knowledge Fed Sec. This STILL hasn't been looked at seriously!!!!
Last edited by V-Jet; 17th Mar 2014 at 03:35.