Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 11:40
  #4361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The shutdown of the Q group although a tragedy for the staff and their families wouldn't have a significant impact in the long term on the public.
I disagree. 30,000 unemployed Aussies, multiplied by their dependents, would have some effect on our local economy. The loss of business to those companies contracted by QF would also feel some pain, so too would their employees.

In the past, whenever I was asked what I did for a living, people I spoke too were generally full of praise for what I did, and for the brand. These days it's a completely different story. When I tell people what I do for a living the very first thing I hear is "why does your CEO still have his job", without fail. And I am hearing this a lot. I think Aussie's still care enough for our national carrier.

Someone better check if anyone at ASIC has Chairman's Lounge privileges
Exactly. And add CASA, Politicians, Fund Managers, and Media Moguls to your list.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2014, 20:59
  #4362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. And add CASA, Politicians, Fund Managers, and Media Moguls to your list.
They are all members of the Chairmans Lounge ... Why would they risk losing out on the free iPads and Grange. The Chairmans Lounge is a status symbol amongst the elite..it's a powerful tool.

But I am beginning to think that attraction might fade... With the decline of QF that Joyce has overseen .. I am wondering if the country's power brokers really want to be associated in any way with the brand.. Even for freebies
cart_elevator is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 03:15
  #4363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
put a red tail on the 788's and replace the 76' with them on the shark patrol.
Shark patrol? Please explain?
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 03:29
  #4364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 351
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
'Shark Patrol'... Vernacular for bouncing up and down the coast all day. ie SYD MEL SYD BNE SYD

aka 'the monorail'.
OneDotLow is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 03:58
  #4365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
'Shark Patrol' used to be the Tasman but as Australian Qantas doesn't do this anymore I guess that term has migrated to the Mainland with the aircraft.
C441 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 04:20
  #4366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 351
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Very true C441!
OneDotLow is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 23:26
  #4367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shark Patrol' used to be the Tasman but as Australian Qantas doesn't do this anymore I guess that term has migrated to the Mainland with the aircraft.
Great point! I noted this comment on Ben's blog this morning.. says it all really..

Qantas versus Piloting excellence-the axe swings again | Plane Talking

Qantas group currently has quite a few aircraft sat around completely idle or with only a few hours work per day.
It also has a significant number of under-utilised pilots.



In an ideal world, you would imagine that QF would have its sales & marketing teams working furiously to identify routes which these assets could be profitably operated.
One wonders whether, with a good business plan and a good-looking but realistic spreadsheet, investors might be prepared to back such an audacious plan.



Considering expanding your aviation business into new (or possibly old) areas at a time of strong market sector growth in the region is hardly going out on limb, business wise. (about 40 sec into this video Cash Flow Positive? - YouTube for those who missed it)


Or instead you can continue to spend $millions to buy & park the unused & unsellable aircraft, not to mention paying out a huge total amount in redundancy payments now, against a long-term reduction in future salaries.
Maybe there won’t be a Qantas in three years.?
If so, the redundancy savings will have evaporated,
AND



I don’t expect Qantas group can sell-on its unused A320′s until they’re at least 3 years old.
It’s time to get proper people in at the top.



With drive, ambition & a genuine Vision of the future for Qantas group, not just a wishy-washy generalisation. (You can’t get what you want, till you know what you want…. AJ doesn’t have (or at least display) any of that vision or drive)
Maybe it can’t be saved.
With the current CEO & Board, I’d agree.
Change those people, define a future & convince investors that it’s a plan that’ll work.

Put the finance in place & then convince the staff that its something worth supporting.
Then go out & make it work.!
Easy………
Airlines are a "people business" the current management team at Qantas has only sent "negative messages" about it's people, to its people for a long time now... so little wonder why things are the way they are...

I am convinced things would change for the better if the management would change tact, take a deep breath and sit down with the staff and nut out some solutions. I'm sure a lot of people would be willing to help out if shown a bit more respect...
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 23:32
  #4368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

On many forums, there are calls to replace the current senior executive management with competent people.

Unfortunately, those who are presently doing such a hatchet job, will be the chief deciders as to who replaces them. And following the stupid is stupid does theory, we will likely only see more of the same, if not worse management.

Time for external intervention by the real owners of Qantas, fund managers.
QFBUSBOY is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 00:25
  #4369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 137
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
[QUOTE]*public would continue to flee to the middle eastern / Asian carriers that they now seem to prefer.*
/QUOTE]

a bit off topic, but then again maybe THE topic.

I've just got back from Europe, flying Emirates (380 and 777s ). We stopped over in Singapore on the way back, and ended up, without realizing when booking, on QF52 (A330) for the last leg.

it occurred to me ( only briefly, because I knew the answer) what a bloody good thing it would be if the board and senior management occasionally flew around the world, down the back, incognito, using a few different carriers.

No one who did what we did would ever fly Qantas again.

Entertainment systems - Emirates screens 3 times the size ( even on their older 777), umpteen times more content.
Paper cups for tea/coffee, plastic cutlery, no newspapers (plenty lying around in Business when you get off), water bottles.

The whole feeling, coming straight off 3 legs with Emirates ( who, until we got to QF, I wasn't that impressed with - delays/buses to planes/stuff ups etc) was of a LCC.

No hope competing with old equipment and a penny pinching culture.
cbradio is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 00:45
  #4370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cbradio

Think what you like about Tom Peters (In search of Excellence) but his latest book opens with this idea:

BFO #1: If you (RELIGIOUSLY) help people—EVERY SINGLE PERSON, JUNIOR OR SENIOR, LIFER OR TEMP—grow and reach/exceed their
perceived potential, then they in turn will bust their individual and collective butts to create great experiences for Clients—and the “bottom line” will get fatter and fatter and fatter. (ANYBODY LISTENING?)

(PEOPLE FIRST = MAXIMIZED PROFITABILITY. PERIOD.)
(ANYBODY LISTENING?)

(FYI: “People FIRST” message is 10X more urgent than ever in the high-engagement “AGE OF SOCIAL BUSINESS.”)
Call me crazy, but doesn't that just summarise in a few sentences all that is wrong in Elaine's World?

*BFO = Blinding Flash of the Obvious
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 04:05
  #4371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: moomooland
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar axes selected Perth services /https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/bu...erth-services/



Amaaaaaazing...
h.o.t.a.s. is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 05:18
  #4372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas new bases

Melbourne for A380
Adelaide for B737

Qantas in drive to improve scheduling
moa999 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 05:24
  #4373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cbradio

Almost every airline in the world has varied product - eg. Emirates with its Business 2x3x2 in the 777s or 10-across in Y.

QF has announced plans for A330 new product, which I agree is very long overdue, and it is meant to be rolled out from the end of this year.

Qantas Business Suite business class seat Airbus A330 - Flights | hotels | frequent flyer | business class - Australian Business Traveller
moa999 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 05:36
  #4374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
QF has announced plans for A330 new product, which I agree is very long overdue, and it is meant to be rolled out from the end of this year.
They have also announced it will take 2 years!!! to complete the fleet upgrade. This will be fine as long as they can convince all of their competitors to do absolutely nothing for 2 years.
1A_Please is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 05:53
  #4375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
it occurred to me ( only briefly, because I knew the answer) what a bloody good thing it would be if the board and senior management occasionally flew around the world, down the back, incognito, using a few different carriers.
cbradio:
Fact 1. Many years ago I was flying back to SYD in Y and got talking to 2 senior QF people - I an executive (Head of Safety). I asked why they were not up the front and the Head of Safety stated that he wanted to see first hand what it was like to fly surrounded by smokers. This was the time when they were talking about banning smoking on international flights. Head of Safety was old school QF, he wanted to see for himself and that wouldn't happen now.

Fact 2. I worked with a guy who's best mate's mum worked at QF (true) apparently her job was to fly international to see how the opposition was going. When I said what a great job, he laughed as he though so as well but his his mate said, yeah but she only flies SQ business class. I wonder if they have such a team still (assume it was a team).

I always thought if when booking staff travel, how good it could be if you were randomly selected, received a call and asked if you'd be happy to fly X to your destination?
Could have been for a single traveler, a couple or a family. If booking in Y on QF they (staff travel) purchased a Y seat (or more) on airline X etc
Could have done this using staff from all levels, maybe not senior management, with the conditions that you completed a survey and return it to staff travel on your return.

OK QF may not have liked what they learnt but that would have been the whole idea, honest feedback. It would never happen though.
73to91 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 09:55
  #4376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hotas

I fantastic deal for JQ passengers who have booked on the Brisbane to Perth City pair.

They have paid a JQ fare and will travel with QF once JQ are off that route.

MC.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 11:47
  #4377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: gold coast
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Not sure scoring Qantas on a Jetstar fare would be seen as a great deal. Not really enough between them to really make anyone whoop for joy. Its just sit down, grin and bear it for 4 hours.
extralite is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 13:38
  #4378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Brisbane to Perth has always been a high yield route, people wanting the cheapest are happy to go BNE-SYD-MEL-ADL-PER in a 14 hour marathon and save 5% on their fare...I am quite surprised that the star have pulled completely off the route though...
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 22:24
  #4379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
people wanting the cheapest are happy to go BNE-SYD-MEL-ADL-PER in a 14 hour marathon and save 5% on their fare
I defy anyone to find a fare on your suggested route cheaper than what JQ/VA or QF are offering on BNE-PER. The various airport charges alone would make this very hard.

.I am quite surprised that the star have pulled completely off the route though..
Me too!! Their results must have been truly horrible.
1A_Please is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 22:29
  #4380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
I was exaggerating slightly on the 4 sector marathon..
Angle of Attack is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.