Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Gregg, Dixon, Carnegie, Singo make a play on QF

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Gregg, Dixon, Carnegie, Singo make a play on QF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2012, 08:20
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Universe
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
In today's Financial Review Singleton when questioned was quite open about being interested because of the 3 billion cash Qantas has in it's coffers.

Since privatisation Qantas has only EVER been run with the view to making those doing so very, very rich.

Depressing for those of us working here who actually care about the company's future........

Last edited by standard unit; 21st Nov 2012 at 02:24. Reason: Pathological pedantry
standard unit is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2012, 00:19
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. Is it too much to ask to get some leadership who might actually be remotely interested in making Qantas great again rather than robbing it?
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2012, 21:54
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Beyond The Envelope
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Contras Shareholding

It now emerges that Dixon and his cronies have a 2% stake in the National Carrier.
No more red wine lunches for Scrotum Face and the leprechaun
Ka.Boom is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2012, 22:32
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 6 Posts
Angry

Wow! 2%!!!

I guess the leprechaun's next bonus will only get approved by a margin of 94% in favour instead of 96% in favour (like at the AGM before the grounding last year).
Shark Patrol is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2012, 23:55
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: herethereandeverywhere
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it just me or does the press not seem to make a connection with Joyce's abysmal performance and the Scrotum Face buy out? It's being reported as though Joyce and Clifford's leadership is being challenged by the private eq group, but none seem to mention how awfully convenient it is that 6 years after their first bid fell through, they're still loitering around with a share price has miraculously halved through spectacular failures of management.
Surely, no one could be that bad off their own bat could they? Surely for AJ's sake he was/is part of the whole plan from day dot. Surely?
bddbism is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 04:10
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely, no one could be that bad off their own bat could they? Surely for AJ's sake he was/is part of the whole plan from day dot. Surely?
Why do you think Borghetti is at Virgin???
QF94 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 09:48
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
What got me was Gregg has a full time job and surely that should be his priority and certainly he should not be making comments about another organisation. So I searched for any articles regarding Gregg, Dixon etc.

A GROUP of private investors keen for a change of strategy in Qantas have purchased a small stake in the airline through a private trust so it would be unable to be detected on the share register and because they believe the shares are significantly undervalued.

The trust is controlled by former Qantas chief executive Geoff Dixon, former chief financial officer Peter Gregg and venture capitalist Mark Carnegie.

Qantas hired Macquarie Group last year as a defence adviser and has kept a close eye on its share register amid speculation the group may purchase a stake and seek to agitate for a change of strategy at the airline.

It is understood the group bought their stake, which is less than 2 per cent, several months ago because they believed the shares were significantly undervalued.

However it also gives them a position to build from for the future.

There is speculation they started buying shares before Qantas announced its alliance with Emirates in September.

The private trust has no involvement with Global Aviation Asset Management, the aviation leasing group in which the three players also have an interest.

Mr Carnegie has been the driver of the discussions with unions and one institution while Mr Gregg is said to have only provided advice during the briefings.

While Mr Dixon is said to have been more distant from the group, he is still an investor in the trust.

Mr Carnegie has been keen to secure backing from union-aligned industry funds to build a strategic stake in the airline but as yet has been unable to garner their support.

Mr Gregg has been conscious of avoiding a conflict with his role as chief financial officer at Leighton Holdings.

It is believed Qantas chairman Leigh Clifford rang Leighton chairman Stephen Johns this week to inquire about Mr Gregg's alleged role in agitating for change at Qantas.

But Leighton has publicly backed Mr Gregg.

Mr Gregg is the only member of the group to have made a public comment, saying this week he had no plans to destabilise Qantas.

The airline's biggest investor, Balanced Equity, and other Qantas investors such as BT have publicly backed chief executive Alan Joyce's strategy for the airline.
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

Andrew Cleary and James Chessell

The group of former Qantas executives and their co-investors seeking support for a change of strategy at the national carrier has emerged as owning a strategic stake in the airline.

The Weekend Financial Review has learned the consortium has amassed a
shareholding in Qantas, believed to be a stake of between 1 and 2 per cent.

The group of investors includes former Qantas chief Geoff Dixon,
former CFO Peter Gregg, investment banker turned venture capitalist Mark
Carnegie and ad man John Singleton.


The stake has been linked to a holding of similar size being held by Credit
Suisse in London, with the initial entry believed to have been when the stock was trading at $1.15. Qantas last traded at that price in early September, and closed at $1.275 yesterday. The airline has been the subject of ongoing speculation that it is vulnerable to a takeover or destabilisation strategy from activist shareholders, as its share price is still trading near a record low and at half book value.

Confirmation that the high-profile investment group had purchased a stake
comes after The Weekend Financial Review reported that Mr Carnegie and Mr Gregg led briefings to some Qantas investors and unions two months ago, in which they pushed a rival management strategy for the airline. One source close to the group said they were aware of sufficient shareholder interest in the alternate strategy. “There wouldn’t be room for shareholder activism if shareholders were happy,” the source said.

The group is understood to have pressed the case for the float of Jetstar’s
Asian franchises, and the partial sale or float of Qantas Frequent Flyer, moves they told one investor could unlock billions of dollars in otherwise unrealised value.

Lacks support of major shareholders

The consortium has privately criticised Qantas chief Alan Joyce’s
international strategy and details of the comprehensive tie-up with Emirates. It has not secured the support of major shareholders including Balanced Equity Management, which owns 11 per cent of the airline. It is believed the investment consortium has also held talks with financial backers to fund a larger stake to push their views, though no decision has been made yet on whether to proceed.

Mr Dixon and Mr Gregg backed the failed buyout attempt for Qantas in 2007, while Mr Carnegie advised the Qantas board which also supported the private equity bid.

The group has made private investments in the airline industry including in
Global Aviation Asset Management, an aircraft leasing firm that they bought into in 2010 before it was sold one year later at a 40 per cent return. Other investors in the GAAM consortium included former Allco Finance Group executive chairman David Coe, and Greg Woolley, a former Macquarie Bank executive who headed the investment committee behind the $11 billion bid for Qantas by a consortium including Allco, private equity group TPG and Macquarie.

Mr Dixon, Mr Gregg and Mr Carnegie declined to comment. Mr Singleton did not return phone calls seeking comments. A Qantas spokeswoman declined to comment.

The group does not have to declare any interest as long as the holding is under 5 per cent.
Qantas club builds rival share stake
73to91 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 09:50
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gregg may have a job but why couldn't he talk about an investment he might make with some friends?
Olivia Howes is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 18:59
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
This should b fcuking illegal. All players have far more knowledge about the internals of Qantas than any other investor.

Last edited by Sunfish; 24th Nov 2012 at 19:00.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 20:48
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 57
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
This should b fcuking illegal. All players have far more knowledge about the internals of Qantas than any other investor.
Classic Management Buy Out (MBO).

They have an alternate plan and they reckon they can make it work better than Joyce based on their direct history and experience with the company. Nothing illegal in that. Unless you take the position you can never hire anyone to use their experience and training gained elsewhere. Takeovers could only ever be undertaken by people with no idea of the industry target otherwise it could be claimed they "have far more knowledge about the internals of X than any other investor". Logically it is only through having that knowledge that you can form a genuine business plan to do something better.

Other investors are free to form consortia and engage Gregg, Dixon and Co to advise them or be part of their team including taking an equity position.
Romulus is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 22:19
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This should b fcuking illegal. All players have far more knowledge about the internals of Qantas than any other investor.
I don't see what the problem is. Dixon delivered profit for the group every year he was CEO.
Olivia Howes is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 23:10
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: goulburn
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the problem in my view is that he did this, while filling his own pockets and setting up an uncertain future for the employees he left behind, rather than create long term value.

The bigger problem however is that he sat in the CEO seat while he plotted to put together a private equity bid when arguably he should have stood aside the minute he became involved. Recent events in Billabong by a director showed that this is the proper course of action when a CEO becomes so heavily conflicted between his personal objectives and those of the company. There was a WA mining company chair who booted a CEO when he got wind of similar events a few years ago. The QF Chair appeared to be part of the plan or atleast sanctioned it, so therefore forgot her own role.

To then continue to have private meetings with the CEO has confused the issue further. It is not unusual for a mentor /student to have ongoing relationships BUT it is a very bad look in the context within which it happened. The fact that it stopped when reported says they knew it as well.

Have to say that the whole situation has the smell of either bad journalist standards or the NSW ALP. One day we will find out which.
ohallen is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 23:36
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see what the problem is. Dixon delivered profit for the group every year he was CEO.
Oballen,

You are right. Dixon was hopelessly compromised in carrying out his fiduciary duty. He SHOULD have stood aside. He didn't.

While Qantas delivered profits, it was the result of the cost cutting model that we lament today. Dixon had shareholders had his #1 priority with customers and staff way behind. He began the process of taking a premium service airline down the road toward a LCC.
I am a shareholder and strongly believe that Qantas should STAY a safe, premium service airline and because it's customers and staff ALSO want it that way.
AEROMEDIC is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 06:12
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
strongly believe that Qantas should STAY a safe, premium service airline and because it's customers and staff ALSO want it that way.
Couldn't agree more. I've said it before. QANTAS should just absorb J*, repaint the aircraft into QANTAS colours, rid itself of the discount bogan fares and make itself a premium only airline. They will not lose market share. The other airlines will quickly sell out of discount fares, and people that want to travel will pay a higher fare, simply not travel or go on a not-so-time efficient means of travel i.e. bus, train, car, etc...


I don't see what the problem is. Dixon delivered profit for the group every year he was CEO.
Olivia, Olivia, Olivia. Yes, Dixon did post profits under his watch, but he also nearly snatched an Australian airline from under the Australian public's nose. All to benefit himself and his chosen few mates, when the then board were to share in almost $200million had the sale gone through, and yet he still walked out with $11million and he hadn't completed his contract.

Dixon also created J* at the expense of QANTAS, cannibalised their routes and commenced the countdown to what we now have. A basket case of an airline, that has a "virtual" international network.

Dixon also did nothing but talk down the airline during its best years whilst making record profits, but when the private equity bid failed, for the first time did he ever talk up the airline. The only reason was to get the best share price for his mates that missed out on the purchase of the company.

Olivia, you can't see what the problem is because you need new spectacles. Dixon was and still is a dog of a person who only looks out for Dixon.
QF94 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 01:13
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Fin Review reporting that the consortium is to make their intention public this week.

Qantas reported to be ready for a public stoush.

I am going to enjoy this!

As for Qantas its probably rooted either way and if Dixon and his mates succeed it seems Jetstar International (at least) may be rooted also.

Interesting times!
tenretni is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 01:55
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tallong NSW
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you want to see how rooted Qantas is get an eyeful of the photos of its supposedly upgraded business class domestic in Australian Business Traveller here:

Qantas moving to Airbus A330-only flights for Sydney-Perth, Melbourne-Perth - Flights | hotels | frequent flyer | business class - Australian Business Traveller

Does Qantas hate its customers? How can any expert management do so much damage to themselves.

Ben has also covered this and says Emirates can bail if Joyce gets flicked.

Qantas continues to kick own goals, as contras circle | Plane Talking
denabol is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 02:23
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Darth patrol didn't want anything to do with Emirates anyway.

They went public with these sentiments when it was announced.

Interesting times we live in.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 02:32
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sector 7G
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My "connected" postie (who correctly called an Emirates/QF deal back in June, although he got the structure wrong) suggests Gerry Harvey's name keeps popping up in relation to the Gregg/Dixon/Singo as a fellow PE "investor". Is this why he is getting into the very public QF bashing game?

The postie also suggest this PE deal is backed by Singapore dollars, a few more twists and turns to go in this saga...
TheWholeEnchilada is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 05:21
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ozzzzzzz
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reading the replies on the ABT website, it sounds like a whole bunch of uneducated ppruners, who are still angry they never got in to QF, still going to every website possible and spend time trashing the brand.

Seriously, go read it. Spelling mistakes, errors in grammar and poor punctuation! If anyone with half a brain reads that website and thinks a real business person has time to comment so "passionately" about such a topic is clearly delusional!!

Qantas moving to Airbus A330-only flights for Sydney-Perth, Melbourne-Perth - Flights | hotels | frequent flyer | business class - Australian Business Traveller
Ultergra is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 05:46
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on aussie.......

Dear Scrotey (ball bag, how the hell do you spell it),

You are taking tens of thousands of people for the ride of their lives on your narcissistic roller coster. They all believe in you and what you stand for. You are truly an Australian to follow. One to be rallied behind and supported. You and you alone can save the workers and thier passengers from this rort of sorts. We love you and miss you. Please come back and save the day. Heaven is awaiting. Kind Regards, The Masses.

P.S. Dont tell anyone, because its a secret, bit like the Church.

Last edited by Acute Instinct; 6th Dec 2012 at 10:17. Reason: Spelling of nut sack in slang
Acute Instinct is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.