Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

How did this security breach occur?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

How did this security breach occur?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Feb 2012, 11:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,072
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Air Marshalls carry guns not Tasers and I believe that program was being scaled back or cancelled due to lack of funding.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 12:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sshh! The federal government are Tough On Border Security, just ask them at a press conference. The big dudes who were formerly spotted sitting in the corner of the departures lounge wearing raybans, tatts and reading back issues of Guns and Ammo have just got more...covert. Really covert.

Just shut up and get irradiated, okay? Nothing to see here, no tasers on the floor, let's keep moving guys... The System Works, god damn youse! The cut price contractors on crap money and worse conditions are doing an awesome job and OTS knows best...
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 19:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts
So I take it the name of the person will never come out and the whole thing will just fade off the radar?
framer is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 20:18
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
worrals, have you no sense of irony?
ampclamp is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2012, 06:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: A hemisphere
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ampclamp.... I hope you were looking in the mirror when you said that!
twentyyearstoolate is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 21:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,072
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Anyone have any idea what actually went down with this incident? Haven't heard anything on the news in regard to charges being laid.
This is highly unusal given the usual hysteria in regard to aviation security events.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2012, 00:06
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Security Breach

Haven't been here for a long time and reading is interesting.
Reading these posts I tend to go with Flexible response, the incident has been hushed up, so obviously it was either a Marshall, a Fed or State Police. Whatever it is its a good bet is a Gov screw up. This I suspect would be ops normal, not really worth discussing any more.
As for getting by the security, I've travelled a lot recently, returned home from one overseas trip to find I had my LeathermanWave in my backpack with my computer the whole time, it was never picked up, am lucky to still have it.
Airport security is often a hit and miss afair.
FLYKER is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 02:52
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Seems to me this was probably missed by the operator of the cabin bag x-ray. Given the composition of the item though, probably an understandable although still unacceptable occurrence.

Warrals, at least someone gets it

OTS seem to have a policy of wanting to be told everything but saying nothing.
YPJT is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 08:00
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warrals, at least someone gets it

If they have charged someone it could take a while to get to court. They may have decided not to prosecute, confiscated the item and given the offender a kick in the butt. IME media don't usually do follow up stories unless someone goes to court or there was violence involved, so a lack of info doesn't automatically mean there's been a cover-up.

The community is relatively well stocked with illegal tasers, pepper sprays, flick batons and similar and I assume that all the big airports still find them fairly regularly. It's the not finding it that's the problem, but no system is 100% failsafe.

Last edited by Worrals in the wilds; 19th Feb 2012 at 09:01.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 18:43
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts
It's the not finding it that's the problem, but no system is 100% failsafe
True. Although it is a problem if this was a set up to get media attention prior to bringing in the scanners.
framer is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2012, 00:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a box
Posts: 350
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes a great system we have, where prohibited items get missed in some cases.

Not today though in Sydney. Job VERY well done!

Person in front leaves deodorant, laptop and leatherman in backpack. Items identified at same time said person walks through scanner only to set it off because of large metal belt buckle.

Comes back through, removes said belt, removes items from backpack and argues about keeping the leatherman.

Meanwhile queue of frustrated travelers backs up.......... including me in full airline uniform.

Person with prohibited items gives up leatherman, goes through scanner and proceeds to collect all other items.

I pass through, no beep, nothing. Grab cap and mobile. Mr prohibited walks off without and care in the world. What do the nuppties do, pull me aside for the explosive trace

Meanwhile all the other screened passengers keep on walking.

Not happy.

Aviation in Australia is going to the dogs because of the continued medelling of government ministers whom have ABSOLUTELY no idea.
Servo is online now  
Old 20th Feb 2012, 01:14
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Servo, I hope that you "required" a private screening - they hate it as they have to take an extra person off the scanners as two security staff are required to conduct a private screening. If every pilot/CC insisted on this, there may be a change to procedures.

If anyone knows a journo, can they request them to have a look at this thread and try to follow up. If it was a law enforcement officer breaking the rules, it should be made public plus it would be good to know what action has been taken by the company contracted to do the security screening - some additional training in Taser recognition may be required.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2012, 10:51
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Servo, I guess you are lucky that you didnt get the body cavity search. These guys know you are crew and that you will not risk your job by creating an uproar of protest. On the other hand, they have no idea about Joe Public individual who might actually be somebody very important and the subsequent uproar causes the security officer's job to be put on the line. It comes down to basic human nature.

My friend who came from the school of hard knocks, advises me that any time you are confronted by a bully, get in the first kick and you will be well ahead of the game.

I would think it is about time that the pilots unions worldwide gets a specialist security team together and does appropriate audits and university aided research on various airport security screening units to identify lapses in security procedures and undue and unwarranted attention to those who protest the least.
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2012, 19:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Zealand
Age: 67
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C'mon a taser can't be used to hijack a plane. Get real!
moreflaps is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.