Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

PERTH 6/12

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Dec 2011, 23:12
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Hey Joker I would rather be in a landing jet struck by lightning than sitting on the tarmac struck by lightning!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2011, 23:18
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Joker,

It is the safety of the ramp workers that is the issue, not the aircraft occupants. In the aircraft you are effectively in a Faraday cage; on the ramp with a headset lead or other equipment you may be a lighting rod.
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2011, 23:45
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
More in "The West"
Thomas still not clarifying who's lighting rule it is: Unions or Qantas...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 00:17
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nimrods and lightning rods

Thomas still not clarifying who's lighting rule it is: Unions or Qantas...
It's not up to that fd to clarify anything.
Unions don't impose 'lightning rules'. The process that is adopted with the 3 warning phases (I prefer to call them risk phases) came about through consultation between the aviation industry and the BOM in the 90's and agreed upon in principle. Hence the standard km/mile measurement. Mr Thomas can't clarify anything specific because he is not fully in the aviation loop, which is a good thing. There are some technical aspects of the industry that is better understood by and within the indsutry itself, and regardless of what Thomas writes he is and will only ever be an armchair critic, and a fd to boot.

At the end of the day the 'lightning' process or standard has been adopted by the aviation industry and agreed upon for the sole benefit of safety. If Mr Thomas is trying to draw a bow between lightning related delays and unions then he is an even bigger fd than I thought.
I am pretty fired up about this. Operational staff or matter of factly the airlines do not have to justify their actions or decisions to the media or any other arena of scrutiny, especially when a decision is based upon safety. Delays were encountered for a number of reasons in Perth, with safety being one of those reasons, these are the facts, that is all that needs explaining, the rest is history.
This thread along with the actual operational and technical knowledge is a good enough way to explain the facts publicly. More accurate and factual than Messr Thomas biased scribblings and uneducated gossip supplied shisen.

Joker89 - Are you fg serious. For your benefit, and I cannot believe you are so stupid, ask yourself this 'why are you safer inside a car than outside a car during a thunderstorm ?' If you can work that out, then apply the same principle to an aircraft. If after all that pondering the penny drops and you work out the answer please phone G Thomas and try to explain that to him, and explain it to the dopey ass selfish public too stupid to understand even the most basic safety facts. Why are all these nuptys complaining anyway, I bet they are the first to run for cover at home, at the beach or on the golf course when bolts start dropping from the sky??
Fing Nimrods.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 00:31
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 225
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point was, the storm cells are far enough away in order to make a safe approach but to close for the ground handlers. Im not saying they should work when lightning is around. Having been struck by lighting when flying i can't say it was a fun experience. Heard a story once of a lightning strike setting off the fire bottles and causing a flame out.

Edit, calm down catus. Lightning brought down a chopper in the north sea. Pilots make loads of decisions regarding weather avoidance. I was trying to make a comparison to people's level of risk they are willing to accept. I've flown through weather when others have turned around. Am I right because I survived or were they making a better decision. Just food for thought.

Last edited by Joker89; 8th Dec 2011 at 00:57.
Joker89 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 00:46
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
This thread along with the actual operational and technical knowledge is a good enough way to explain the facts publicly. More accurate and factual than Messr Thomas biased scribblings and uneducated gossip supplied shisen.
CJ, unfortunately, the public doesn't tread Prune. It's pretty poor form that GT, having made thinly veiled accusations on the blame game yesterday has refused to clarify who's policy it is to not work during TS.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 01:26
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT is back at it on the radio with his ramblings again this morning and unfortunately I think the general public will believe him. He even had the hide to insinuate it may have been industrially related.

However, after being amongst it on the taxiways and Tarmac on Tuesday his view is very naive and sheltered (pardon the pun).

Lucky he's only a commentator...... or attitudes like his will only increase the risk of injury and or fatalities.

I've never seen people scramble so quickly when a lightning bolt struck near the Tarmac while it was open at about 3:00pm.
QFdude is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 03:09
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair, one of my work colleagues was on a flight that was stuck on the ground, away from a gate, for 2 hours or so and he said that they saw numerous ground strikes in the vicinity of the airfield and the aircraft whilst waiting - spectacular and scary, were his words. So, they weren't ansty about sitting on their bums at all.
SimonBl is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 04:51
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alaska
Posts: 183
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Apparently the virgin staff were threatened with dismissal if they refused to work outside.
Rabbitwear is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 05:21
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alabama, then Wyoming, then Idaho and now staying with Kharon on Styx houseboat
Age: 61
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently the virgin staff were threatened with dismissal if they refused to work outside.
If true then it is nice to see Virgin's take on 'just culture'. But of course CASA wont be looking at that.
gobbledock is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 05:53
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Past the rabbit proof fence
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was talking to WAC's "safety one" (safety officer leader) he explained that whilst WAC considered the airport closed due to the lightning - they have no jurisdiction as to what aerocare etc do ie. continue working. He said it is entirely up to the companies own procedures.

To all not in the West - and to Geoffrey Thomas who obviously doesnt have a cubical near a window - it really was an unusually violent storm that hung over the city for ages. Perth recorded all its December rain in a couple of hours.

SAFETY BEFORE SCHEDULE - Qantas's own line - not any unions.
aveng is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 07:43
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Lightning took out the terminals PA system and even the runway lights for around 30mins, even when there was a break in the storms we left the aircraft, and as we were going down the stairs the aircraft on the bay beside us was struck. There was massive amounts of strikes around the airport. Yes a nightmare for sure but I wouldnt have wanted to be ramp staff working outside during the event.
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 08:09
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I spoke to GT yesterday morning and explained that the TS policy is a Qantas policy not an award condition. He said he would correct the article and hasn't, is it true he was blaming us on radio today?
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 08:56
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: I like cheeseburgers
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently the virgin staff were threatened with dismissal if they refused to work outside.
I think you mean AEROCARE staff.
Scamp Damp is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 10:06
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALAEA and GT dance a waltz !!

Steve, no offense but have you caught some 'cloud cuckoo land' from Joyce?
Thomas is a biased nupty. I told you to stop dialing 1800fwit, see what happens? You wasted your time phoning him as your version and 'straightening out of the facts' is not what he wishes to hear, it is too simple and wouldn't sell stories....embellished bulls#it sells stories.

I have said it before, journalists (excluding Phelan and Sandilands) are parasites. Bulls#it is the host that they feed off.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 11:57
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Apparently the virgin staff were threatened with dismissal if they refused to work outside.
What a load of tripe! And you would know judging by your location???!!! hahahahaha
topend3 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 13:41
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve, 882 6PR at around 9:15 to 9:20 on the 8/12.

Not so much blaming, but would not rule it out. From memory I think his reference was "grey", when talking about who was to blame.
QFdude is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:47
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, blame it on Bryan Grey and Compass. There were none of these problems before that.
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 23:09
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Apparently still a lot of bags to be reunited with their owners.
YPJT is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2011, 01:55
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Look up and wave
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I hope GT is happy with himself.

The industry he loves (since going over a DC3 as a kid) is full of people who think this self proclaimed 'expert' is a tosspot.

I for one have boycotted the Australian Aviation magazine as long as this clown writes (rambles) for them.

I suggest any other self respecting industry person do the same.
MACH082 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.