Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

ANOTHER QANTAS RB211 ENGINE FAILURE

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

ANOTHER QANTAS RB211 ENGINE FAILURE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2011, 05:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Somewhere in FADEC
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grey Hairs

I still remember (looong time ago) spending an entire shift hand cropping one stage of blades for an RB211 compressor....but when they were finished balanced and installed, (along with every other blade set) the engine gave max power all day at the noise box (test cell)....and spent years on wing...

I wonder if the people doing this job in Timbuktu today for Q spend the time and effort to hand craft engines that held world records for on wing reliability...

At least now thats its all changed....even my hair is going grey...i can tell my kids that i worked for Q when its tradesmen (and women) created and maintained the stuff of legends...for all the RIGHT reasons....

And all the Rollers ever needed (in my day) was MORE MJ2....
moremj2 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 05:53
  #22 (permalink)  
J52
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know the feeling well Moremj2. Spent my early years hand crafting J52's and doing failure/reliability analysis. RNZAF reliability was upper percentile and manhours spent were recovered from extended TBO compared to USN and other operators. But this is the way of the world. All the airline execs see is the cost and not the total picture of the reliability outcome (not to mention training, employment, knowledge transfer, pride in a good job etc). Some day in the future when QF reliability falls below acceptable limits some bright exec will clamour to open an engine line with the desire of putting the companies fate back under their own control. Government will kick in a few readies for training and employment and the exec will be handsomely bonused for being a visionary. And then we will need to import the skills through immigration because those skilled will be working somewhere on a mine site or retired.
J52 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 06:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
That is exactly what "world's best practice" means to an engineer moremj2. We deal with machines, people lives and safety. They deal with beans.....
Ngineer is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 07:03
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia / United Kingdom
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas incidents

Not that I'm counting. But I'm wishing that I hadn't booked Qantas six months ago for a London-Melbourne flight next week.

Code:
 
Date       Flght Dep Arr Reg    Type     Fault
 
16/10/2011 QF002 BKK SYD VH-OJS 747-400  Engine failure
 
28/07/2011 QF030 HKG MEL ?      747-400  Alieron fault
 
16/07/2011 QF064 JNB SYD VH-OJL 747-400  Engine failure
 
03/06/2011 QF052 SIN BNE VH-OJI 747-400  Could not retract landing gear
 
20/05/2011 QF001 BKK LHR VH-OJL 747-400  Engine failure
 
09/05/2011 QF005 SYD SIN VH-OJH 747-400  Engine failure
 
23/03/2011 QF020 MNL SYD VH-EBL A330-200 Fire In cockpit
 
18/01/2011 QF107 SYD LAX VH-OJA 747-400  Engine fuel valve failure
 
06/01/2011 QF430 MEL SYD VH-OGP 767-300  Flaps failure
 
15/11/2010 QF017 SYD EZE VH-OEI 747-400  Smoke in cockpit
 
05/11/2010 QF006 SIN SYD VH-OJD 747-400  Engine failure
 
04/11/2010 QF032 SIN SYD VH-OQA A380-800 Uncontained engine failure
 
31/08/2010 QF074 SFO SYD VH-OJP 747-400  Uncontained engine failure
 
10/11/2009 QF673 BNE MEL VH-TJY 737-400  Engine failure
 
07/10/2008 QF072 SNG PER VH-QPA A330-300 ADIRU failure
 
24/01/2008 QF030 HKG MEL VH-OJK 747-400  Hull breach, depressurisation
 
25/09/1999 QF001 SYD BKK VH-OJH 747-400  Runway overrun in heavy 
rain

Last edited by SLFAussie; 17th Oct 2011 at 08:26.
SLFAussie is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 07:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Look up and wave
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Notice how all those incidents appear from Dixon era decisions compounded by Joyce?

I'd love to see some graphs on incident increase correlating to share price, correlating to outsourcing, under Dixon and Joyce.

Those alarm bells are starting to ring.
MACH082 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 07:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone is zero
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please do not think I agree with this logic, I'm just the messenger.
Look at it from an exec's point of view. The hand crafting of engines takes time & money today, to save money in the future. This represents a fundamental time mismatch in profitability for the next reporting period (less profit next period, greater profit in subsequent periods).

Executives would rather have "one in the hand than two in the bush". They may not be around to take the credit for the "extra" profit in the future, hence they scoop up the lower bonus now than risk missing out in the future. If you do not believe the fundamental aim of certain groups of senior managers is to loot whatever they can before moving to the next host, please disregard.
breakfastburrito is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 07:17
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Look up and wave
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P.S I love the Cathay banners going into eastern state airports.

"Our people are our airline"

I think that's aimed squarely at the little man
MACH082 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 07:35
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know, I'm so super impressed with you blokes and the great concern you have for the safety of the travelling public.

But, I do remember a few years ago when the pilots of Ansett and Australian Airlines were having a similar stoush with their respective employers and the members of your union and the F/Es, were more than happy to work with, and for, the overseas pilots with dubious qualifications who were brought in to take up the slack.

Where was your "great safety" stand then?

Don't know the answer?...well I'll tell you...

no where to be seen!
amos2 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 08:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My hat goes off to all ex emplyees of EOC. I was around the Tech services area not long ago & saw the plaques & awards etc that Qantas recieved for engine reliability & hours on the wing. I thought it was a disgrace that we would never recieve any award like that again. We had 90 years of expertise & knowledge, handed down from tradesman to apprentice, thrown out the door. Unfortunetly, even if we wanted to bring EOC back to it's former glory, it would take decades. Why? Due to the greedy leeches that have been in power for the last 10 years or more.
Watching the news tonight I find it very disappointing to see Alan Milne saying that a exploding engine is not a safety issue!
bandit2 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 08:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mach082........nope, sorry to disappoint you but it's a worldwide ad campaign and the folks in hello kitty city wouldn't care about any QF staff issue.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 08:44
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On Uranus
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watching the news tonight I find it very disappointing to see Alan Milne saying that a exploding engine is not a safety issue!
Ahhhh Alan Milne,,,,Yes how times have changed indeed.
Anulus Filler is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 08:52
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would that be the same Alan Milne who the ALAEA fought for over a tax issue when he was posted in LAX?
tigers and stripes
leopards and spots
griffin one is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 09:10
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The phrase "Duty of care." comes to mind. The lawyers are going to have a field day in the event of an accident as QF continue to operate aircraft with a known defect.

Luckily the B744 isn't a twin, ETOPS approval would have pulled a long time ago with that inflight shutdown rate.

Are their pilots being given additional sim sessions to keep their engine failure drills right up to scratch as they are very likely to need them ?
Metro man is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 09:17
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
This evening's news reported that this was the third engine failure for Qantas this year. Is this the correct number?
Kelly Slater is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 09:26
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah! Annulus Filler... AKA... The Chocolate Soldier...are you the bloke who wants to become my very best friend?
amos2 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 09:31
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kelly Slater, have a look at the list above. It`s the 4th, if the list is correct. No offence intended SLFAussie. Don`t forget things always come in three`s.
bandit2 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 09:53
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia / United Kingdom
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No offence taken, bandit. The information is mostly sourced from the Aviation Herald website. One from The Age online and the 1999 runway overrun from Wikipedia. The list includes flights involved in an emergency landing, turnback, or significant aircraft damage. These are the ones that I know about. There may be others.
SLFAussie is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 10:09
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Are their pilots being given additional sim sessions to keep their engine failure drills right up to scratch as they are very likely to need them ?
Metro man,

Why would they need additional sim sessions? With the way this is going, they will be well rehearsed with the real thing!!!
flyforfun is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 10:19
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: goulburn
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can see the need for a full page ad now with a photo of the head of Engineering saying in flight engine failure and flames don't constitute a safety risk.

I think we have the Rat problem in one.

Is this the QANTAS we want or deserve.

Julia or Martin would you like to comment now please?

Mr Joyce do you endorse this position??
ohallen is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2011, 10:29
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would the cost to qantas international be for all the engine failures in the last year and cost of repair? Might be a fair portion towards the "200 million" company stated loss I suspect.
Why is the required mod not being incorporated ?
Are other operators of the RB211 having the same failure rates?
Didn't CASA say that continued failure would be cause for action?
Sigh !!.........So many unanswered questions.

Last edited by Collando; 17th Oct 2011 at 10:33. Reason: Spelling
Collando is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.