Thai Airways really low around Melbourne Airport
Thread Starter
Thai Airways really low around Melbourne Airport
Just read The Age at my favourite shopping mall. Small paragraph noted with sub heading Thai flight too low.
" A Thai Airways plane flew too low as it landed at Melbourne Airport last night. Air Services spokesman Matt Wardell confirmed that the aircraft was too low as it approached the runway. Air services Webtrack system recorded the Bangkok to Melbourne flight at about 1020 ft over Sunshine North at 8.19pm yesterday. About two minutes later the flight was recorded at about 4121 ft.
Mr Wardell said ATC staff realised the plane was too low and instructed the pilot to fly around the airport and reattempt the landing. The plane landed safely at about 8.36pm. Mr Wardell said Air services Australia would report the flight to ATSB"
Interesting to see the outcome of that investigation. Automation complacency again?
" A Thai Airways plane flew too low as it landed at Melbourne Airport last night. Air Services spokesman Matt Wardell confirmed that the aircraft was too low as it approached the runway. Air services Webtrack system recorded the Bangkok to Melbourne flight at about 1020 ft over Sunshine North at 8.19pm yesterday. About two minutes later the flight was recorded at about 4121 ft.
Mr Wardell said ATC staff realised the plane was too low and instructed the pilot to fly around the airport and reattempt the landing. The plane landed safely at about 8.36pm. Mr Wardell said Air services Australia would report the flight to ATSB"
Interesting to see the outcome of that investigation. Automation complacency again?
Originally Posted by Centaurus
Automation complacency again?
Before a lot of people are killed in these situations, either pilots need to be removed from cockpits completely so human error can never occur, or there should be a concentrated effort to improve monitoring skills. The only way that will occur is by making pilots do this stuff manually, regularly. Only then will they be in a critical, monitoring mode when it really counts, close to the ground, because they will know how to do it themselves, and so will know what the automatics are doing when the aircraft is (trying to) doing it.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Before a lot of people are killed in these situations, either pilots need to be removed from cockpits completely so human error can never occur, or there should be a concentrated effort to improve monitoring skills. The only way that will occur is by making pilots do this stuff manually, regularly. Only then will they be in a critical, monitoring mode when it really counts, close to the ground, because they will know how to do it themselves, and so will know what the automatics are doing when the aircraft is (trying to) doing it.
25th Jul 2011 16:49
25th Jul 2011 16:49
... and all removing pilots from the cockpit will do is move the direct source of "human error" from crews to system designers. That said, I agree with your sentiments.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They nearly arrived at Essendon once, I was right behind thinking where the is he going, yes you go down the Essendon localiser, but you don't stay there!
They nearly arrived at Essendon once, I was right behind thinking where the is he going, yes you go down the Essendon localiser, but you don't stay there!
But yes we are the real pilots who actually read and understand an approach plate?? Always said these damn computers would make average pilots into bad pilots....
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aeronautical data integrity
In these days of automated systems and system to system (and data card to system) data transfer, have we (or the regulator) missed an important step in ensuring the integrity of aeronautical data from source to end use. In the "old days" humans helped put stoppers in the cheese hole - some of those humans are now out of the loop.
Just a thought - but one I have often voiced frequently.
MJG
Just a thought - but one I have often voiced frequently.
MJG
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Age: 68
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Situational Awarenes
Incidents like this nearly always come down to one thing. A loss of ( or lack) of situational awareness. Know the MORA, know the MSA's, know where you are, know where you should be and understand the data presented on the approach charts. In a word 'Airmanship'. Now I am not pointing the bone as I know we are all only human and we all make mistakes but a good and thorough approach briefing that includes carefully cross checking the information presented in the FMC goes a long way towards eliminating this type of error.
Lecture over.
Maggot
Lecture over.
Maggot
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go back to my question, in recent times we have had allegations by CASA of 2 Tiger, 1 DJ and now this one.
What is going on out there because it is starting to have a smell of industry systemic failures or a change in regulatory scrutiny.
What is going on out there because it is starting to have a smell of industry systemic failures or a change in regulatory scrutiny.
It's not that hard to get it right!
Even with all of those things most of us can cope well, but every pilot group has a few stars, a large proportion of competent pilots, and a few who drag their heels. If you end up with two crew together who are from the last group.....it's too much for them and the results will are starting to show themselves.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Framer,
Thank you I was feeling ignored which on some occasions is entirely justified, but not on this one.
My point was is there any linkage of issues noted by the Senate into a seemingly increased frequency or is the regulator now looking at it more often.
Perfectly reasonable questions I would have thought.
Thank you I was feeling ignored which on some occasions is entirely justified, but not on this one.
My point was is there any linkage of issues noted by the Senate into a seemingly increased frequency or is the regulator now looking at it more often.
Perfectly reasonable questions I would have thought.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Age: 68
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OFDM with high capture rates and a regular system of feedback to the pilot population, coupled with a system of educating crews in guarding against undesirable trends also helps. As does an effective training organisation and an efficient set of SOP's.
Maggot
Maggot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AvHerald have a plot for the aircraft Incident: Thai B773 at Melbourne on Jul 24th 2011, descended below minimum safe altitude and ATSB now have the incident on their website Investigation: AO-2011-086 - Operational non-compliance - Boeing 777, HS-TKD, 11Km south Melbourne Airport, 24 July 2011.