Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Thai Airways really low around Melbourne Airport

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Thai Airways really low around Melbourne Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2011, 04:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Thai Airways really low around Melbourne Airport

Just read The Age at my favourite shopping mall. Small paragraph noted with sub heading Thai flight too low.

" A Thai Airways plane flew too low as it landed at Melbourne Airport last night. Air Services spokesman Matt Wardell confirmed that the aircraft was too low as it approached the runway. Air services Webtrack system recorded the Bangkok to Melbourne flight at about 1020 ft over Sunshine North at 8.19pm yesterday. About two minutes later the flight was recorded at about 4121 ft.

Mr Wardell said ATC staff realised the plane was too low and instructed the pilot to fly around the airport and reattempt the landing. The plane landed safely at about 8.36pm. Mr Wardell said Air services Australia would report the flight to ATSB"

Interesting to see the outcome of that investigation. Automation complacency again?
Centaurus is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 06:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Centaurus
Automation complacency again?
I don't like the term "complacency" in this context. I don't believe crew after crew in these situations are complacent; they are reliant, which is against their training, but only natural as humans get subconsciously seduced by the wizardry.

Before a lot of people are killed in these situations, either pilots need to be removed from cockpits completely so human error can never occur, or there should be a concentrated effort to improve monitoring skills. The only way that will occur is by making pilots do this stuff manually, regularly. Only then will they be in a critical, monitoring mode when it really counts, close to the ground, because they will know how to do it themselves, and so will know what the automatics are doing when the aircraft is (trying to) doing it.
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 06:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
They did something similar off the 16 ndb a while back
compressor stall is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 06:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before a lot of people are killed in these situations, either pilots need to be removed from cockpits completely so human error can never occur, or there should be a concentrated effort to improve monitoring skills. The only way that will occur is by making pilots do this stuff manually, regularly. Only then will they be in a critical, monitoring mode when it really counts, close to the ground, because they will know how to do it themselves, and so will know what the automatics are doing when the aircraft is (trying to) doing it.
25th Jul 2011 16:49
Capt Bloggs

... and all removing pilots from the cockpit will do is move the direct source of "human error" from crews to system designers. That said, I agree with your sentiments.
burty is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 08:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They nearly arrived at Essendon once, I was right behind thinking where the is he going, yes you go down the Essendon localiser, but you don't stay there!
teresa green is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 08:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They nearly arrived at Essendon once, I was right behind thinking where the is he going, yes you go down the Essendon localiser, but you don't stay there!
I remember that. I think it was in the 70's.

But yes we are the real pilots who actually read and understand an approach plate?? Always said these damn computers would make average pilots into bad pilots....
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 10:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aeronautical data integrity

In these days of automated systems and system to system (and data card to system) data transfer, have we (or the regulator) missed an important step in ensuring the integrity of aeronautical data from source to end use. In the "old days" humans helped put stoppers in the cheese hole - some of those humans are now out of the loop.

Just a thought - but one I have often voiced frequently.

MJG
mgahan is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 10:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: always ahead of my aircraft
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
let's wait for the report from ATSB
TSRABECOMING is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 11:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any ATSB notes yet?
Ejector is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 15:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Age: 68
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Situational Awarenes

Incidents like this nearly always come down to one thing. A loss of ( or lack) of situational awareness. Know the MORA, know the MSA's, know where you are, know where you should be and understand the data presented on the approach charts. In a word 'Airmanship'. Now I am not pointing the bone as I know we are all only human and we all make mistakes but a good and thorough approach briefing that includes carefully cross checking the information presented in the FMC goes a long way towards eliminating this type of error.

Lecture over.

Maggot
maggot738 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 22:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So...what he said then!
EW73 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 23:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go back to my question, in recent times we have had allegations by CASA of 2 Tiger, 1 DJ and now this one.

What is going on out there because it is starting to have a smell of industry systemic failures or a change in regulatory scrutiny.
rodchucker is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 23:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed Maggot. It's not that hard to get it right!
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 00:08
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
let's wait for the report from ATSB
That could be anything from three months to a year judging by past history.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 01:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the elev of Sunshine North that was quoted ?

What was the Thai plane meant to be at over Sunshine North?

It is starting to make JetStar look good !!!
Ejector is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 01:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
It's not that hard to get it right!
Provided you have the right people, with the right training and experience doing the job, and those people aren't burdened by the collective stresses of fatigue, modern rostering preactices, pay not comensurate with responsibility, degraded ATC services and engineering support, reduced autonomous authority, overloaded/overworked ground support personel, and ever increasingly complicated SOPs and legislation.
Even with all of those things most of us can cope well, but every pilot group has a few stars, a large proportion of competent pilots, and a few who drag their heels. If you end up with two crew together who are from the last group.....it's too much for them and the results will are starting to show themselves.
framer is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 01:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Framer,

Thank you I was feeling ignored which on some occasions is entirely justified, but not on this one.

My point was is there any linkage of issues noted by the Senate into a seemingly increased frequency or is the regulator now looking at it more often.

Perfectly reasonable questions I would have thought.
rodchucker is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 07:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Aus
Age: 55
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basically Airline management and Regulators have alowed the holes in the swiss cheese to line with greater ease than ever before. Profits before saftey.
Eastmoore is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 20:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Age: 68
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OFDM with high capture rates and a regular system of feedback to the pilot population, coupled with a system of educating crews in guarding against undesirable trends also helps. As does an effective training organisation and an efficient set of SOP's.

Maggot
maggot738 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 23:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AvHerald have a plot for the aircraft Incident: Thai B773 at Melbourne on Jul 24th 2011, descended below minimum safe altitude and ATSB now have the incident on their website Investigation: AO-2011-086 - Operational non-compliance - Boeing 777, HS-TKD, 11Km south Melbourne Airport, 24 July 2011.
yiiim2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.