Plane Talking - Ben Sandilands on the money yet again!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plane Talking - Ben Sandilands on the money yet again!
It might be a public holiday, but Ben has obviously not been drinking too many cleansing ales. He has his finger right on the pulse...as usual.
We, as an industry, are extremely fortunate to have such a capable journalist reporting the facts in a timely, independent manner.
My favourite part of the article uses some classic aussie vernacular:
PURE GOLD!
Cheers Ben. On this very special of Aussie days, I tip my hat to you Mr Sandilands. You are a special breed of Aussie journo.
PG
[B][/B]Some big ‘Mayday’ calls are coming
April 25, 2011 – 1:05 pm, by Ben Sandilands
In terms of action rather than emergencies, there are some big May Day calls coming from Australian airlines next month.
On May 4, the Senate inquiry into pilot training and airline safety standards is due to report, possibly on the same day that Virgin Australia confirms that it will be Virgin Australia (while keeping V Australia as its integrated international brand).
To a similar timetable REX or Regional Express will most likely carry through its foreshadowed intention to reduce its services, perhaps by as much as 30 per cent in terms of flights. Most likely the ATSB will choose that same day to issue its final report into the scandalous ditching near Norfolk Island on November 19, 2009, of an air ambulance flown by Pel-Air, owned by REX’s owners.
In May there should be no doubt that Tiger will have to shape up or ship out.
And unless Qantas changes its constant posturing about how it is all the fault of labor not management that it can’t turn a decent dollar in this country, it is clearly highly likely to suffer a self fulfilling damaging dispute with the pilots and other parts of its work force.
The only thing not highly likely to occur next month will be further details about where a totally independent panel recommends Sydney put its second airport.
Of course, leaks do happen. It might even do the blindingly obvious, and recommend that Sydney’s second airport actually be in Sydney, but, we’ll see. It is about time a truly independent committee decided to remedy rather than justify a government policy disaster.
The Senate inquiry
Given the non-partisan unanimity of intense engagement between the members of the committee with the issues raised in this inquiry, it is reasonable to expect it will deliver a very well argued set of recommendations that will tighten up the slack in pilot training programs and some deficiencies in how safety issues are reported and investigated.
This was the first major Senate inquiry of any description where the press was scooped repeatedly by the members, in particular the chairman Senator Bill Heffernan and the inquiry instigator, Senator Nick Xenophon, who broke stories about stick shaker incidents on Qantaslink turbo-props, and a Jetstar A330 that nearly landed wheels up at Singapore Airport, and whose scrutiny of the Jetstar NZ Cadet Pilot scheme lead to a U-turn by Jetstar that would have filled the chunder bags on any of its services in an instant had it occurred on a regular flight.
Virgin calls Australia home
Comments already made by Virgin Blue CEO John Borghetti make it clear that every time Qantas bleats about how it can’t make money out of being Australian he is going to emphasise that Virgin is Australian.
The contrast is already painful. Qantas sees its future as being less Australian, to wit, the faux-Qantas Jetconnect nonsense and the basing of Australian registered A330s and eventually Boeing 787s in Singapore under Singaporean labor laws, and less full service, to wit the Jetstar play. In return it is up against an operation which says it can be higher in quality and lower in cost than Qantas, and be more Australian.
The emphasis by Qantas on how it will be harmed by a future industrial settlement doesn’t really address the issue as to why it is failing to pay its shareholders, satisfy its customers, or participate in the post GFC recoveries enjoyed by major competitors. Could it just be that it is being poorly managed, or that the plot, whatever it is, has been lost?
REX and regional realities
No-one should be in any doubt that REX has been ultra successful in making small SAAB 340 services work effectively to country towns including some where it has survived and prospered against the larger turbo props of Qantaslink and even A320 and E-70 services. It is very vulnerable however to even a small loss in passenger numbers as it tries to recover rising fuel costs, and other carriers are prepared to put a much higher value on its pilots than it does, or can, which is also its problem in the good times.
The clear signals it has sent that it will respond to these realities by cutting routes is very painful for everyone, except perhaps Sydney Airport, which sees access by slower and smaller aircraft as taking up slots that can be used by far larger jets bringing in much more revenue. In fact Sydney Airport sees no future for airliners of less than 72 seats capacity in the next 10-15 years.
REX’s SAABs are no longer in production. There is no 34 seat replacement for the design currently realistically available now or in the foreseeable future. How and where REX sees itself as going is thus an important issue, unless it is to go into history.
Tiger trapped
Even if the reasonable assumption is made that Tiger completely satisfies all of the concerns that leads to CASA issuing a show cause to the carrier late last month, a management that allowed such a situation to arise is unlikely to survive.
It is inconceivable that a well run airline can accumulate so much by way of problems over a period of months without taking the correct action that would have prevented CASA from going to the step immediately below actually grounding the airline.
This means there will either be significant changes in Tiger, or it will suffer an even more damaging encounter with the safety regulator.
Its unreliability of service is also an issue in a sophisticated market. Australian are used to flying. It doesn’t matter how cheap the fare being offered may be if the perception is that passengers can’t assume they will even takeoff on the day they intended to fly.
Without pricing power in the domestic market, one has to ask what continuing purpose Tiger has in Australia.
April 25, 2011 – 1:05 pm, by Ben Sandilands
In terms of action rather than emergencies, there are some big May Day calls coming from Australian airlines next month.
On May 4, the Senate inquiry into pilot training and airline safety standards is due to report, possibly on the same day that Virgin Australia confirms that it will be Virgin Australia (while keeping V Australia as its integrated international brand).
To a similar timetable REX or Regional Express will most likely carry through its foreshadowed intention to reduce its services, perhaps by as much as 30 per cent in terms of flights. Most likely the ATSB will choose that same day to issue its final report into the scandalous ditching near Norfolk Island on November 19, 2009, of an air ambulance flown by Pel-Air, owned by REX’s owners.
In May there should be no doubt that Tiger will have to shape up or ship out.
And unless Qantas changes its constant posturing about how it is all the fault of labor not management that it can’t turn a decent dollar in this country, it is clearly highly likely to suffer a self fulfilling damaging dispute with the pilots and other parts of its work force.
The only thing not highly likely to occur next month will be further details about where a totally independent panel recommends Sydney put its second airport.
Of course, leaks do happen. It might even do the blindingly obvious, and recommend that Sydney’s second airport actually be in Sydney, but, we’ll see. It is about time a truly independent committee decided to remedy rather than justify a government policy disaster.
The Senate inquiry
Given the non-partisan unanimity of intense engagement between the members of the committee with the issues raised in this inquiry, it is reasonable to expect it will deliver a very well argued set of recommendations that will tighten up the slack in pilot training programs and some deficiencies in how safety issues are reported and investigated.
This was the first major Senate inquiry of any description where the press was scooped repeatedly by the members, in particular the chairman Senator Bill Heffernan and the inquiry instigator, Senator Nick Xenophon, who broke stories about stick shaker incidents on Qantaslink turbo-props, and a Jetstar A330 that nearly landed wheels up at Singapore Airport, and whose scrutiny of the Jetstar NZ Cadet Pilot scheme lead to a U-turn by Jetstar that would have filled the chunder bags on any of its services in an instant had it occurred on a regular flight.
Virgin calls Australia home
Comments already made by Virgin Blue CEO John Borghetti make it clear that every time Qantas bleats about how it can’t make money out of being Australian he is going to emphasise that Virgin is Australian.
The contrast is already painful. Qantas sees its future as being less Australian, to wit, the faux-Qantas Jetconnect nonsense and the basing of Australian registered A330s and eventually Boeing 787s in Singapore under Singaporean labor laws, and less full service, to wit the Jetstar play. In return it is up against an operation which says it can be higher in quality and lower in cost than Qantas, and be more Australian.
The emphasis by Qantas on how it will be harmed by a future industrial settlement doesn’t really address the issue as to why it is failing to pay its shareholders, satisfy its customers, or participate in the post GFC recoveries enjoyed by major competitors. Could it just be that it is being poorly managed, or that the plot, whatever it is, has been lost?
REX and regional realities
No-one should be in any doubt that REX has been ultra successful in making small SAAB 340 services work effectively to country towns including some where it has survived and prospered against the larger turbo props of Qantaslink and even A320 and E-70 services. It is very vulnerable however to even a small loss in passenger numbers as it tries to recover rising fuel costs, and other carriers are prepared to put a much higher value on its pilots than it does, or can, which is also its problem in the good times.
The clear signals it has sent that it will respond to these realities by cutting routes is very painful for everyone, except perhaps Sydney Airport, which sees access by slower and smaller aircraft as taking up slots that can be used by far larger jets bringing in much more revenue. In fact Sydney Airport sees no future for airliners of less than 72 seats capacity in the next 10-15 years.
REX’s SAABs are no longer in production. There is no 34 seat replacement for the design currently realistically available now or in the foreseeable future. How and where REX sees itself as going is thus an important issue, unless it is to go into history.
Tiger trapped
Even if the reasonable assumption is made that Tiger completely satisfies all of the concerns that leads to CASA issuing a show cause to the carrier late last month, a management that allowed such a situation to arise is unlikely to survive.
It is inconceivable that a well run airline can accumulate so much by way of problems over a period of months without taking the correct action that would have prevented CASA from going to the step immediately below actually grounding the airline.
This means there will either be significant changes in Tiger, or it will suffer an even more damaging encounter with the safety regulator.
Its unreliability of service is also an issue in a sophisticated market. Australian are used to flying. It doesn’t matter how cheap the fare being offered may be if the perception is that passengers can’t assume they will even takeoff on the day they intended to fly.
Without pricing power in the domestic market, one has to ask what continuing purpose Tiger has in Australia.
My favourite part of the article uses some classic aussie vernacular:
and whose scrutiny of the Jetstar NZ Cadet Pilot scheme lead to a U-turn by Jetstar that would have filled the chunder bags on any of its services in an instant had it occurred on a regular flight.
Cheers Ben. On this very special of Aussie days, I tip my hat to you Mr Sandilands. You are a special breed of Aussie journo.
PG
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A massive 12 months ahead indeed. I think Australian Aviation will look very different this time next year. This point in time in my opinion is a huge turning point for the industry and Mr Sandilands sums it up nicely. So many factors at play.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 39
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
This article is full of predictions for the future. I'm curious to know how Ben Sandilands can be "right on the money" if none of these predictions have come to fruition yet.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tip my hat to you Mr Sandilands. You are a special breed of Aussie journo.
I liked,
The emphasis by Qantas on how it will be harmed by a future industrial settlement doesn’t really address the issue as to why it is failing to pay its shareholders, satisfy its customers, or participate in the post GFC recoveries enjoyed by major competitors. Could it just be that it is being poorly managed, or that the plot, whatever it is, has been lost?
and,
And unless Qantas changes its constant posturing about how it is all the fault of labor not management that it can’t turn a decent dollar in this country, it is clearly highly likely to suffer a self fulfilling damaging dispute with the pilots and other parts of its work force.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: sydney
Age: 76
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since was denied first class upgrades by a certain CEO back in the 90's this person has had an agenda to damage wherevere he could . Judge for yourself .could never get over the snub back to cattle class . Felt should have been up the front , drinking the bubbly . Reports and articles have been biased ever since . Credibility None
TIMA9X asked:
Sorry TIMA9X, but at the moment AJ's clearly unable to answer that I think, because it's totally obvious that he's completely lost it. 
So, having read Ben's piece, the question did cross my mind, what is the plot AJ?
unionist, every time I read one your posts I wonder if you are for real. Plane Talking is a well written blog and Sandilands isn't afraid to question the airlines whilst other journos just rewrite the press release and call it a day.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is inconceivable that a well run airline can accumulate so much by way of problems over a period of months without taking the correct action that would have prevented CASA from going to the step immediately below actually grounding the airline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unionist (Ian), I thought you were told not to divulge any information gained during your IR consultations with QF management. You are leaving Qantas exposed by your actions.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote:
It is inconceivable that a well run airline can accumulate so much by way of problems over a period of months without taking the correct action that would have prevented CASA from going to the step immediately below actually grounding the airline
Can't wait for the Gen Y response to this one
It is inconceivable that a well run airline can accumulate so much by way of problems over a period of months without taking the correct action that would have prevented CASA from going to the step immediately below actually grounding the airline
Can't wait for the Gen Y response to this one
Donald Duck reckons that they're ok
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unionist I usually refrain from personal attacks but seriously you have no idea.
Yes I am a pilot and love to hear journos sing the same song that I am, but your slamming of Sandilands is so obviously just baiting the pilots, or a wind up , or possibly you are just a half wit, that any credibility you had is gone.
Anyone, no matter what side they are on can see he is a fair and balanced observer of aviation matters in Australia and to state otherwise is both childish and...frankly...plain moronic.
Yes I am a pilot and love to hear journos sing the same song that I am, but your slamming of Sandilands is so obviously just baiting the pilots, or a wind up , or possibly you are just a half wit, that any credibility you had is gone.
Anyone, no matter what side they are on can see he is a fair and balanced observer of aviation matters in Australia and to state otherwise is both childish and...frankly...plain moronic.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
We, as an industry, are extremely fortunate to have such a capable journalist reporting the facts in a timely, independent manner.
Popgun.Isn't that the truth.
The many things wrong with this company, that each of us see each day, is it any wonder that we struggle to make a buck.
From good paying customers that are turned away purely to spite staff, to the countless levels of mangers, consultants and baby faced HR uni-graduates trying to direct well trained and experienced employees in the wrong direction.
I look at the Jetstar operation now being serviced by countless different ground-staff organisations and think to myself - didn't the Qantas group use to do this all in-house? Now we are paying extra cash to a third party to do all this work (that we could be doing for nothing!!!). The stupidy escapes comprehension.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alabama, then Wyoming, then Idaho and now staying with Kharon on Styx houseboat
Age: 61
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Donald Duck reckons that they're ok
As a side point, I agree with what Ben is saying totally, but realisticaly isn't he just re-stating pretty much what we already know ??
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the Great Southern Land
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a side point, I agree with what Ben is saying totally, but realisticaly isn't he just re-stating pretty much what we already know ??
Cheers,
Inbound.
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't wait for the Gen Y response to this one
I kinda get sick of the "Gen X, Gen Y, Me generation" arguments. The "Me" generation walked out of Africa many thousands of years ago and are alive and well. They're called "modern humans" in anthropological terms.