Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Merged: Qantas and Rolls Royce Secret

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: Qantas and Rolls Royce Secret

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2010, 14:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: InDahAir
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having spent a lot of my career observing Boeing manufacturing~you're wrong.
Kangaroo Court is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 17:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Too bloody right Kanga. Its Spanish on the floor at Boeing....and a few sneaky looks anytime legal immigration or green card is mentioned.

Now the boeing vs airbus debate has gotten to the factory floor. A new low.

The Don
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 19:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Location Location
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF A380 on the Pacific

From the QF website:-

With CASA's approval, two A380s have returned to service, operating between Australia and the UK, with Qantas voluntarily applying a range of conditions that include not operating the aircraft across the Pacific until further operational experience has been gathered.

Does anybody know what this means?

When is it likely that QF will start them back on the Pacific?
Hobo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 19:48
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oprah will be SPEWING
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 23:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mydadsbag
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You mean the A3-80seater?
Mr.Buzzy is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 01:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
If we operate at these power settings, will the engine blow up? I think is what it means.
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 01:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Beech or the Office.
Age: 14
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
buzzy,

check your PMs
Normasars is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 02:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Under the big blue hangar
Age: 40
Posts: 240
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The engine is certified at 72000lbs for QF. Only QF have these 72k engines. SIA and Luft have 70k engines.

Rolls Royce have asked QF not to run them at 72k but wont say why, until they issue a certified document stating that QF can do as they please.

The engine has been runup to 84k by RR to 72k out of LAX should not be too much of a problem.
Bootstrap1 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 06:16
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hobo - I'd rekon in the northern summer
airtags is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 07:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Under the big blue hangar
Age: 40
Posts: 240
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Kangaroo. you obviously have a poor regard for the 380 and all things airbus. But the 787 is more or less built by a consortium of risk sharing partners and look at the ball of crap that has turned into.

Boeing have screwed themselves well and truly with the way they have managed the manufacture of the 787, and then to compound the issues they straight out lie to all and sundry that the program is still on track blah blah blah.

I used to be a Boeing man but I can say that airbus make a product that is so much more user friendly in many ways.

I hold the 744 and 777 in high regard but their they wont be here forever and if Boeing cant sort out the 787 saga they wont be here either. They have rehashed the 744 again but I believe it is to little too late and too much old technology. Modern aircraft shouldn't be using long cable runs to control flight controls in this day.
Bootstrap1 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 17:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Bootstrap1:

Modern aircraft shouldn't be using long cable runs to control flight controls in this day.
How many thousands of people has fly by wire killed? How many more before all the bugs are ironed out? In any case what you call "modern technology" ain't that modern anyway, for example the RR Trent uses diffusion bonded Titanium fan blades a technology that was started to be developed Forty years ago.


The aircraft manufacturing industry is very conservative, and for good reason.

Every time I climb into the little bug smasher, I think of all the people who paid with their lives to determine the design requirements of every single component in it, right down to the whistle hole in the engine breather.

You can stick your "modern technology".
Sunfish is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2010, 17:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: InDahAir
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bootstrap 1,

I agree with the concerns and sentiments of the Boeing 787 saga. In many ways it confirms the complexity of trying to do things, "The Airbus way".
Kangaroo Court is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.