Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Open Letter to Senator Xenophon

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Open Letter to Senator Xenophon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2010, 01:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Open Letter to Senator Xenophon

From: (insert name)

To: [email protected]


Senator Xenophon,

I am very pleased that you have taken issue with pilot training standards in this country.

I am very concerned that the Australian Airline Industry will be putting passenger lives in danger if it continues with plans to place Cadet Trainees newly qualified as basic Commercial Pilots into the First Officer seats on commercial airline services.

Sound aviation safety practices are taken for granted in Australia. I fear that we will be heading for a Colgan Air-like accident in this country if Airline Management insists on placing under-experienced pilots in the control seats of large jet airliners.

The US Congress has recently mandated the following minimums for airline pilots before they may operate as crewmembers on a commercial airline:

Minimum Licence Level – Air Transport Pilot Licence
Minimum Flight Experience – 1500 Hours
Minimum Age – 23 years

I fully support this strengthening of safety standards in the US and request your support to ensure the same sweeping safety reforms are made to similarly protect the travelling public here in Australia.

I would greatly appreciate your attendance at the next Aviation Industry meeting in Melbourne on 27 September in order to assist with public recognition of this safety-critical issue.

Lives may be lost if the Government and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority does not recognise that the duty of care for public safety in Australia demands an airline pilot with more than 200 hours of flight experience.

Thanks for all your hard work and continuing support for aviation-related safety-critical issues.

Sincerely,

(insert name)

Last edited by Popgun; 17th Sep 2010 at 06:59. Reason: made industry-inclusive
Popgun is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 01:19
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

All,

I just emailed this to Senator Xenophon.

May I suggest everyone passionate about this issue do the same by copying and pasting and then sending their own copy to the Senator's office.

Feel free to add some personal information about yourself and your history if you desire. Remember, however, stick to the facts, keep calm and without emotion and don't get distracted from the primary target - Safety.

This battle must be fought on the grounds of SAFETY. Any other focus is a distraction that risks losing PUBLIC SUPPORT...critical if we are to get legislative change.

Mods: Any chance you could 'sticky' this up top. In more than 10 years of membership on PPRUNE this is the first issue that has me wanting to get up on my soapbox.

Cheers,

PG

Last edited by Popgun; 17th Sep 2010 at 07:10. Reason: Safety focus only / Public Support Critical / Recommendation to personalise if desired...
Popgun is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 01:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DSS-46 (Canberra Region)
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Popgun,

May I suggest you not single out any one airline for special treatment. This is an Australian airline industry-wide problem, IMO. Otherwise it looks like you have an axe to grind against Jetstar.

We're happy to sticky an appropriate letter for you, but it must address the whole industry. That will gain the greatest effect

Regards.
Tidbinbilla is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 02:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,060
Received 730 Likes on 197 Posts
Popgun,Great idea, I agree with Tid'that this needs to be aimed at the industry as a whole. This is the version I will be sending to Senator Xenophon....GordonSenator Xenophon,I am very pleased that you have taken issue with pilot training standards in this country. I am very concerned that the airline industry will be putting passenger lives in danger if they continue with their plan to replace experienced pilots with recently qualified Commercial Pilot Cadet Trainees for the role of First Officers on airline service.Sound aviation safety practices are taken for granted in Australia. I fear that if the practice of placing under-qualified and/or under-experienced trainees in the control seats of large jet airliners, the industry exposes the public to an accident similar to that see in the United States last year. I am sure you are aware that following that accident, the FAA revised that practice and raised the experience requirements for pilots in order to prevent similar accidents from occurring in the future.I would greatly appreciate your attendance at the next AIPA meeting in Melbourne in order to assist with public recognition of this safety-critical issue. Lives may be lost if CASA does not recognise that public safety in Australia demands an airline pilot with more than 200 hours of flight experience.Thanks for all your hard work and support.(insert name)
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 04:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brisbane
Posts: 407
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My two bobs worth

Dear Senator Xenophon,

I am a professional pilot and have flown for twenty years, presently as Captain of Boeing 737 with an Australian RPT Operator. I have flown throughout Papua New Guinea, Europe and Australia/Pacific region.
I agree with your views on the lowering of experience levels. Whilst the low cost carrier model has undoubtedly caused a lowering of wage levels it is not solely responsible for the lowering of experience levels nor a lowering of acceptable standards.
The responsibility of enforcing minimum standards for commercial pilots lies with CASA. Unfortunately I fear any increase in expected standards will only come about as a corollary of an accident/ Royal Commission.
My great concern is that those operators lower down the food chain (predominantly turboprop operators) will be forced through pilot attrition to the major players (large well established airlines) to reduce their minimum requirements to levels which will satisfy the regulatory authorities but nevertheless pose an increased risk to the traveling public.
I thank you for bringing this to the attention of the Parliament and hope that you can achieve change in order to preserve the publics right of safe travel.

Yours sincerely
greenslopes is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 04:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great idea but I personally think each of us have a different story to tell. Put pen to paper (or finger to keyboard) and tell the man of your experience. How you've seen it through your eyes. Its not a petition its an education of people that don't understand the complexities and realities of our profession.

Greenslopes, I'm concerned about turboprop operators also but the reality is that this will now reach the likes of your operation. You are going to have the young 200 hour impoverished foreign FO sitting next to you in the not too distant future.

All okay in CAVOK but gee experience chimes in when the **** hits the fan. The people that say all you need is training obviously haven't seen things go wrong before in multicrew land. Its an overly simplistic view full of biases. It takes a long time to make a good effo and it takes decades to make a good Captain. There are alot of things that build a safe pilot and one of them is good training

You need training AND experience AND attitude AND...the list goes on.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 04:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just sent mine through!
Brake Boy is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 06:03
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,449
Received 232 Likes on 123 Posts
"...if Jetstar insists on placing under-qualified, under-experienced trainees ..."
May I suggest you delete the "under qualified ... trainees" part. It suggests the airline is not complying with Civil Aviation requirements, and they are not trainees, they are commercial pilots.
tail wheel is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 06:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bottom of the Harbour
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
This is getting a little messy, why has this not been raised when QF started their cadetship? What about the cadets in the right seat of DHC-8's? There was no issue when this was introduced, why is it a problem now??

It is becoming a little too JQ phobic!
KABOY is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 06:33
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standby by for Revision 1

OK, I hear you all. Thanks for the input and advice. Standby for a more industry-generic version.

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 07:02
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Revision 1 posted...

OK, I've just reworked it to remove anything emotive or company-specific and to make the language inclusive of the entire industry.

Mods: Better? OK to sticky?

Cheers,

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 07:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need individual letters with personal experiences in the industry its not a petition. They need to hear what goes on behind the facade.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 07:54
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Mr Hat,

I agree...thats why I edited to suggest guys add their own personal touches...

In the absence of personal editing, however, due to either lack of time, shaky penmanship or plain laziness, the letter sent, as is, is still better than remaining silent or sending nothing.

Lets hope we see some cohesion from the pointy end of our industry.

Cheers,

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2010, 09:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is it popgun. Now or never. This will determine if we all end up in the middle east one day..
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2010, 05:03
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Mods: Sticky Please

Mods,

Please sticky if you are happy with the amendments.

Cheers,

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2010, 09:06
  #16 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fortunate that Senator Nick Xenophon has taken up the cudgel for this issue. It could have been Rob Goat**** instead!
HotDog is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2010, 06:24
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, this is nicely surprising...I can't remember the last time an Aussie politician picked up a safety-related issue and ran with it...
Popgun is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2010, 06:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's not your average politician. Lets not forget his work on the jump seat. His words to me were profound. It was the first time someone stood up and said "hang on this doesn't make sense" or words to that effect:


Found at:

http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au:80/parlIn...lication%2Fpdf
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2010, 12:51
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aviation heaven, australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Pilots of Aus,
The erosion of training standards and employee standards is happening industry wide. I think it is important for you to note that there is an increasing problem in engineering that is similar to this. we must unite the persons of aircraft operations !

that is all, and good luck.
empire4 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2010, 13:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is getting a little messy, why has this not been raised when QF started their cadetship
QF cadets do not operate as F/Os for Take off, approach and landing for some years.
This is about nothing other than cutting costs and driving conditions down, last I checked there were plenty of experienced pilots in Australia unlike other countries around the world that have cadet programmes.
hongkongfooey is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.