Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas, the Pesky Child and the American Tourist

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas, the Pesky Child and the American Tourist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2010, 05:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas, the Pesky Child and the American Tourist

One would have to understand why the child's parents weren't responisble? Screaming child lands Qantas in court after sending woman deaf | Herald Sun
Dropt McGutz is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 06:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why the child's parents weren't responsible

......I think the child was 67 so I suspect her parents are dead.
blueloo is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 08:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Her lawyer, Brian Lawler, argued Qantas was negligent because the plane's cabin and cockpit crew failed "to take all the necessary precautions to prevent the accident that resulted" in her "injury".
I would love to have a nice cold bear with Mr Lawler........sounds like he is either very dumb, or just a money hungry scum sucking bottom dweller of the legal profession who probably should have some disciplinary action taken against him by those in his own profession for bring their profession into further disrepute.

What sort of moron takes on a case like this..........really thses cases should not get to a court. The initial interview from the lawyer should have a bit of "due dilligence" conducted at the plaintiff's expense (always) in order to protect the courts and the legal profession from plain and stupid claims. If the Lawyer then takes on the case, and its clearly stupid, the judge should throw it out of court at the Stupid Lawyers expense (always) for allowing it to get that far.

That would then sort o few sheep from the goats.

And Lawyers wonder why they get a bad name .
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 08:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cmon, its 2010! No one is responsible for their own lives let alone their children!
Ultralights is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 08:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MELBOURNE
Age: 54
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
qantas seems to settle every case taken against them. Sometimes the cost of defending an action with the resultant publicity is more expensive than throwing a few bucks at some loser to go away.

you will find most companies do this
GENKI is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 09:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,220
Received 75 Likes on 40 Posts
Trying sitting next one stupid mother and obnoxious child for nearly twenty two hours!!!
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 09:36
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,452
Received 232 Likes on 123 Posts
"What sort of moron takes on a case like this..."
Those law firms whose fees are based upon a percentage of the damages awarded. Class actions - e.g. the James Hardy matter estimated at AU$1.573 billion in 2003 - pay very well. Legal fees up to 40% are not uncommon.

A certain female Prime Minister was a litigation lawyer at one of Australia's largest law firms well known for actions of this nature, before entering politics.
tail wheel is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 11:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,554
Received 52 Likes on 20 Posts
just a money hungry scum sucking bottom dweller of the legal profession who probably should have some disciplinary action taken against him by those in his own profession for bring their profession into further disrepute.
You know what they say about lawyers..........99% of them give the rest of their profession a bad name.
chimbu warrior is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 11:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a date with destiny.
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On their way to get married, a young Catholic couple was involved in a fatal car accident... The couple found themselves sitting outside the Pearly Gates waiting for St. Peter to process them into Heaven. While waiting they began to wonder: Could they possibly get married in Heaven?

When St. Peter arrived they asked him if they could get married in heaven. St. Peter said, "I don't know. This is the first time anyone has asked. Let me go find out," and he left.

The couple sat and waited for an answer.....for a couple of months.

While they waited, they discussed the pros and cons. If they were allowed to get married in Heaven, SHOULD they get married, what with the eternal aspect of it all? "What if it doesn't work? Are we stuck in Heaven together FOREVER?"

Another month passed. St. Peter finally returned, looking somewhat bedraggled. "Yes," he informed the couple, "You CAN get married in Heaven.."

"Great!" said the couple. "But we were just wondering: what if things don't work out? Could we also get a divorce in Heaven?"

St. Peter, red-faced with anger, slammed his clipboard on the ground."What' s wrong?" asked the frightened couple.

"OH, COME ON!!" St. Peter shouted. "It took me 3 months to find a priest up here! Do you have ANY idea how long it'll take to find a lawyer?"

Sorry about the thread drift, but if we got rid of the lawyers, who else would we make jokes about?
assasin8 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 11:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Quite right Tailwheel. Who do those mesothelioma victims think they are.





Mesothelioma victims are entitled to be compensated. I'm not sure the legal fraternity is morally entitled to the "commissions" they charge!

Tail Wheel
desmotronic is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a money hungry scum sucking bottom dweller of the legal profession
Pray tell... are there actually some OTHER types of lawyers? If there are, please point them out, when one is sighted! They surely must be on the endangered species list......
onetrack is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.