Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Dose Of Competitive Reality

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Dose Of Competitive Reality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 20:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any JQ charters operated by QF will carry 4 digit flight numbers.
Incorrect. The J* charters SYD-HNL-SYD operate as the QF3 & QF4 respectively. They are ATS planned as those flight numbers as well. Ask any crew who have done one.

QF600 series MELBNE flts are not JQ charters. Some will however carry the JQ codeshare flt number.
Agreed, all normally scheduled 600 series flights are QF services. It's the adhoc additional capacity services which (some have) been charters. Just like the Internationals mentioned above, QF nominate a 600 series number & ATS plan it as a QF RPT service. Have a look next time one comes up in open time & ask why the additional service.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 20:25
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
From moa999 - "3. Qantas already splits its Europe traffic via Sing, Bangkok and HK - does it make commercial sense to split it further."

Split them, perhaps not, but why not a new service?

and "For oneworld connections, QF would be better fly to Amman where Royal Jordanian has a great hub"

So why not Amman ? provides plenty of connections to Lebanon (where I'm sure most of the traffic is heading to anyway ? ), and as stated it is a Oneworld airline - then onto Manchester (if it could ? ) providing an alternative for people wanting to travel to the Midlands and all points north and avoids LHR.
73to91 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 22:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK fare was $1959 each inc taxes when I booked in January. Then the cheapest QANTAS fare was around $2200-$2300. Even if QF or SQ was cheaper there is the inconvenience ie additional 8 hrs travel time and an extra stop. You can't change geography, it's a shorter distance via Dubai. Would consider going through anywhere in the UAE but Jordan, Syria or anywhere bordering Israel - don't think so. I could have paid $1650 with Air Asia and gone KL to Stansted but then you have to pay for a loco like Easyjet to NCL with a long stopover. Not worth it. Will qualify for an upgrade on my next trip with EK as well. Did I mention their 30kg baggage allowance for economy?
I'm all for competition but how do you beat that QF?
Veeeffarr is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 23:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,573
Received 88 Likes on 34 Posts
Etihad has been operating since 2004 and has still not made a profit.

How can you compete with a company which has such deep pockets and doesn't have to make money (although they no doubt will one day).
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2010, 23:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: australia
Age: 59
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
veeeffarr, a small word of caution.
a mate's sister is cc with emirates.
don't accept the towels offered on board, they are recycled!
her stories about the paki labourers and the towels are gross.
QF don't recycle towels but we dropped them in y/c 6 months ago
indamiddle is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2010, 00:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
QF missed out badly by not having 777s. A Singapore hub with onward connections could have given a wide network with one stop access, routes such as Adelaide - Bombay or Brisbane - Paris would have been possible.

Offer a good product, reduce the cost structure. Maintenance could be done in Singapore under strict supervision, foreign flight attendants could legally be used on many of the routes as opposed to Jetstar illegally using foreigners on Australian domestic services.

A leaner, long term sustainable QANTAS would be better for Aussie jobs than a bloated high cost carrier which can't compete and eventually goes the way of Ansett.

Prehaps they'll get it right with the B787.
Metro man is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2010, 01:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will check any towels offered carefully for stains...Do they spit in the coffee as well?
Veeeffarr is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2010, 02:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hicksville, Alabama
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Incorrect. The J* charters SYD-HNL-SYD operate as the QF3 & QF4 respectively. They are ATS planned as those flight numbers as well. Ask any crew who have done one.
Oh, really??

Can I have some of what you are smoking?
kotoyebe is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2010, 13:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Queensland
Posts: 172
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the JQ charter flights to HNL operate they are set up in the res and CM system using QF6403 and QF6404 which are the numbers we use in those systems for charters. So JQ get to keep the revenue from the ticket sales and presumably down the track pay QF for the charter.

I would however be amazed to think that would ever occur
Wonderworld is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2010, 21:09
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So JQ get to keep the revenue from the ticket sales and presumably down the track pay QF for the charter.
Yes, it would be lovely if that happened!

Koto, Ken etc: As others have alluded to, it IS all about the money.

1. Sitting in the cockpit pre-departure chatting to engineer about GSE (Aircon, power carts etc) availability. Engineer points across the tarmac at the ground equipment we gave to JQ for free and now when we need it, we hire it back!

2. No 767 bays available in BNE domestic as we taxi in. Except Bay 25, which is reserved at the QF terminal for JQ. Call up ops on the radio to see if it'll be free long enough for us to park & turnaround. Ops say yes, but we can't use it. Why? Because it costs too much money. We have to pay JQ for it! Sit waiting with engines burning for 15-20 mins for another bay to become available. The extra fuel, delay, and angry pax are cheaper to deal with.

3. From the mouth of a manager at HNL in the early days: One million dollars of A330-related equipment for the JQ service billed to Qantas mainline account. Manager calls up and asks for JQ account details. Manager told to wind his neck in.

We are not completely stupid. We all know what the "Qantas Group" is doing, and what business practices they are using to achieve it.
DutchRoll is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.