Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

What's the real truth behind Jet Connect?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

What's the real truth behind Jet Connect?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Sep 2009, 04:44
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Sydnet,NSW,Australia
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote "Jet Connect, Jetstar, Cobham a little help from Alliance. . . . who needs Qantas anyway"

I do
rockarpee is online now  
Old 3rd Sep 2009, 00:41
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts
Some people on here crack me up with their "high horse" attitudes.
There are good pilots and not so good pilots everywhere. Qantas isn't filled with superior pilots but they do have a culture of sticking fairly rigidly to SOPS and taking their training seriously. In my opinion thats the biggest decider on an airlines safety. I've flown with mainline guys, jetconnect guys, jetstar guys, Air NZ guys, military guys, there were top notch pilots and average pilots in all five groups. If one thing did stand out about the mainline guys (personal opinion only obviously) it's that I think the authority gradient in the flight-deck was perhaps a tad steeper than the others. Whether thats a good thing or bad thing depends on the situation I guess.
QF pilots have to jump through a bunch of hoops that others don't and at the end of it we're supposedly no better than anyone else.
Correct. You've just jumped through more hoops than everyone else because thats what your company requires of you. I think though that the ongoing training at mainline(I'm thinking classroom stuff) results in the mainline guys probably being a bit more current with emergency proceedures than others which has gotta be a good thing.
Framer
framer is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2009, 12:39
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Beech or the Office.
Age: 14
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF INSIDER,

QLINk is next, you can bet your @rse on that. And what is wrong with it by the way?
Where were you/AIPA and your cronies when SAA was dissolved. Where were the same usual suspects when QF bought out Impulse and the whole thing with JQ kicked off.

This has been done to death before I know, but Mainline has never given a toss about anybody but themselves until now. Why? Well you know the answer to that. You don't need me or anyone else to explain the answer to you.

As mentioned here in another thread, QLINK have signed off on a Narrow Body jet clause in their last EBA. There will be a need for a 90-120 seat a/c in the full service sector and you can bet your bottom dollar it won't be Mainline crewing it.

The really sad thing in all of this is that "The Company" has played us all like a fiddle. We should have learnt from history and past mistakes but we are all just too dumb. The "I'm alright Jack" mentality that exists here in OZ has fukced us all forever.
Normasars is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2009, 21:49
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Norm

You are correct Regional jets within a couple years with QLink management having already been assessing the C Series. However i suspect that Q management will take the opportunity to screw everyone flying a red tail aircraft. The RJ's will take flying away from the 737's and these pilots will be told they can fly the rj's but at regional wages as there will be no work otherwise for them , remember QLINK is only a marketing Company with associated "contractors". EEA and SSA will remain turbo prop drivers. Cobham may get the C series to replace 717's also but at SSA/EEA wages.

Meanwhile JStar continues to grow as QANTAS Shrinks.
vigi-one is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2009, 23:22
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QLINk is next, you can bet your @rse on that.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't QFlink the first to start on the undercutting?

Early 1996, those at Southern undercut Eastern Airlines pilots on the pay rates to fly the BAE 146.

Southern then operated the BAE146 from Oct 96 thru Oct 06 before the aircraft were then transferred to National jet.

Looking after ones owns self interests has never been a quality unique to mainline.

MC
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2009, 23:24
  #46 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
This has been done to death before I know, but Mainline has never given a toss about anybody but themselves until now.
If you know that this has been done to death before, I don't see how you can possibly hold to your statement about not giving a toss about anybody about themselves 'until now'. A group opportunity list (that includes regional drivers) has been part of AIPAs push for four years. Some AIPA members have been arguing for that concept (publicly as well as privately) for far longer than five years.

Still, you keep telling yourself whatever you need to tell yourself to maintain the rage against the mainline drivers.
Keg is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2009, 23:42
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stralya
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good on you Norm,

I wasn't any part of Qantas and certainly not a cronie, so give me a break on the vitriol..

Keep the fires burning as people like you with that attitude make Oldmeadow's job oh so easy..
QFinsider is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2009, 02:03
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgetting the usual "nyah-nyah" vitriol for a moment;

I would like to see a cost comparison of the current/proposed entire Jetconnect operation compared to closing it down and mainline flying across the Tasman as it used to,

With AOC and all the management costs of a separate company I would be suprised if Mainline were not cheaper!
Tankengine is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2009, 07:27
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: there
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Vigi-one, it is the SSA EBA that now has Regional Jet pay scales in it. Something similar to VB E-jet rates if I remember correctly. I suspect that the current Cobham contract won't be continued after its current term.
slice is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 01:08
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: australia
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a question,

How many times a year would a Jetconnect, qantas mainline and express freighter australia pilot/s go and do training in the 737 simulator??? just curious. Is the airline/s standards higher than the CASA CAR 217 and the NZ caa equivelant check/training needs/requirements??
downwind is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.