Virgin on Ch 10 news
Probably this:
From here ; Article - WSJ.com
WELLINGTON (Dow Jones)--National carrier Air New Zealand Ltd. (AIR.NZ) Wednesday said it intends to oppose applications filed by Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) and Australia's Virgin Blue Holdings (VBA.AU) for regulatory approval of a proposed alliance.
Earlier this month, Virgin Blue and Delta announced plans to form a joint venture that will expand each carrier's reach between the U.S. and Australia and across the South Pacific.
According to the companies, the alliance would allow both of them to compete more effectively in those markets as they work together on product planning, codesharing and extending frequent flyer program benefits.
Air New Zealand, however, said the proposed tie-up is anti-competitive.
"These airlines have already both separately entered these markets, trumpeting the lower fares they will bring. Almost immediately however they are complaining about the ability of their competitors to force them out of the market if they are not allowed to collude on prices and capacity," Air New Zealand General Counsel John Blair said in a statement.
Blair also called on the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to be consistent.
In January, the ACCC said it wouldn't authorize a proposed cooperation agreement between Air New Zealand Ltd. (AIR.NZ) and Air Canada (AC.A.T.), arguing that it would reduce competition.
"The ACCC's analysis in that instance, if consistently applied to the Virgin-Delta proposal, indicates that this new application is unlikely to succeed," said Blair.
"We would certainly hope there will be consistency applied."
By Rebecca Howard, Dow Jones Newswires; 64-4-471-5990; [email protected]
Earlier this month, Virgin Blue and Delta announced plans to form a joint venture that will expand each carrier's reach between the U.S. and Australia and across the South Pacific.
According to the companies, the alliance would allow both of them to compete more effectively in those markets as they work together on product planning, codesharing and extending frequent flyer program benefits.
Air New Zealand, however, said the proposed tie-up is anti-competitive.
"These airlines have already both separately entered these markets, trumpeting the lower fares they will bring. Almost immediately however they are complaining about the ability of their competitors to force them out of the market if they are not allowed to collude on prices and capacity," Air New Zealand General Counsel John Blair said in a statement.
Blair also called on the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to be consistent.
In January, the ACCC said it wouldn't authorize a proposed cooperation agreement between Air New Zealand Ltd. (AIR.NZ) and Air Canada (AC.A.T.), arguing that it would reduce competition.
"The ACCC's analysis in that instance, if consistently applied to the Virgin-Delta proposal, indicates that this new application is unlikely to succeed," said Blair.
"We would certainly hope there will be consistency applied."
By Rebecca Howard, Dow Jones Newswires; 64-4-471-5990; [email protected]
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Survival of the fittest -and apparently they were the fittest .......
Most of the cabin crew on board are certainly carrying ballast compared to other carriers.
On a recent flight one bent over to pick up a napkin, I thought for a minute there was going to be a drug bust as there was at least 10 to 12 kilo's of crack evident.
M.P.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why all the animosity towards another country's national airline?
Shouldn't the kiwi's be the only ones who should feel aggrieved, with Jet Connect, now J* and of course PB competing on all the domestic routes. How many NZ companies are flogging around Australia's domestic routes competing with VB and the QF group?
If this is still a leftover of the Ansett debacle, I have heard compelling arguments from both sides.
Shouldn't the kiwi's be the only ones who should feel aggrieved, with Jet Connect, now J* and of course PB competing on all the domestic routes. How many NZ companies are flogging around Australia's domestic routes competing with VB and the QF group?
If this is still a leftover of the Ansett debacle, I have heard compelling arguments from both sides.
Registered User **
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course Managers Perspective is the epitome of the male physique and has women swooning over him at all times.....
A word of advice MP.....Don't look in a mirror.......
A word of advice MP.....Don't look in a mirror.......
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I recently had the pleasure of flying Air NZ across the tasman and internal flts, basically it was only a few hundred extra to go confirmed Air NZ rather than risk QF staff travel.
I was extremely impressed with the service. Plenty of leg room in economy class B744, very attentive cabin crew, my partner joked about getting a nice glass of business class pinot noir, the cabin crew member smuggled one down to her (and he wasn't aware wew were staff). Internal flights on Dash 8 were about the same as Qlink. Return flight economy on A320 was also great, especially the IFE, having in seat IFE in economy class puts Qantas aircraft (767/737) to shame, and it actually works well compared to QF rockwell collins system.
I was extremely impressed with the service. Plenty of leg room in economy class B744, very attentive cabin crew, my partner joked about getting a nice glass of business class pinot noir, the cabin crew member smuggled one down to her (and he wasn't aware wew were staff). Internal flights on Dash 8 were about the same as Qlink. Return flight economy on A320 was also great, especially the IFE, having in seat IFE in economy class puts Qantas aircraft (767/737) to shame, and it actually works well compared to QF rockwell collins system.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Walapaper - exactly.
Both ANZ and Tiger are complaining about it because its possibly a move that will help VB survive in the long run and that disrupts their own plans.
Nothing to do with flying to the US at all.
Both ANZ and Tiger are complaining about it because its possibly a move that will help VB survive in the long run and that disrupts their own plans.
Nothing to do with flying to the US at all.
How many NZ companies are flogging around Australia's domestic routes competing with VB and the QF group?
Kind of ironic though isn't it, lodging an appeal against VB, a company they indirectly helped to grow and expand through their own incompetence
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Doing a pre flight inspection
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tiger are going in to bat for SQ, ANZ well they are just peaved because of their failed tie up with AC last year, whay would the ACCC approve a tie up between two forigen airlines to benefit from Australian shores??? Kidding themselves much???
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: allover
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The ACCC has denied many airline tie ups in recent times including Qantas and Air NZ, and recently Air Canada and Air NZ.
From the NZ Herald:
"If the deal is approved, it would be galling for Air New Zealand given the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's rejection of a similar co-operation agreement it proposed with Air Canada on flights between Auckland and Sydney to Vancouver."
And the entire article is New route 'collusion': Air NZ - Business - NZ Herald News
I'm still trying to digest the ACCC's ability to rule on two airlines from NZ and Canada.
From the NZ Herald:
"If the deal is approved, it would be galling for Air New Zealand given the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's rejection of a similar co-operation agreement it proposed with Air Canada on flights between Auckland and Sydney to Vancouver."
And the entire article is New route 'collusion': Air NZ - Business - NZ Herald News
I'm still trying to digest the ACCC's ability to rule on two airlines from NZ and Canada.
I think it's clear here that they're looking for leverage to cry 'unfair' at the ACCC for holding up the AC codeshare. Really, that decision was a silly one and at the end of the day would probably have made little difference to the marketplace for Australian travellers.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VBPCGUY,
You have hit the nail on the head buddy. It has nothing to do with anti-competitive issues, it all trying to accelerate the demise of the VB group. Tigers only real business plan is to run a loss till VB go bust, and this deal with Delta only delays this business plan, which means that Tiger slips closer to the edge as Singapore slowly starts to crack the S%^Ts with the whole plan and says, enough is enough, good try, but there is no more cash and your on your own, sink or swim. The new show on TV really helps the cause too, not. I know you get what you pay for, but is that an excuse for a bad service? I don't want to see any airline fail, I have friends at Tiger/Jstar/Vb etc etc. I could not care less who wins the ego race, because this is all about greed, I just hope that the pay goes in for everyone when its meant to, and thats that!
Those in the Ivory Towers can play "mine is bigger than yours", all they like. Who cares!
You have hit the nail on the head buddy. It has nothing to do with anti-competitive issues, it all trying to accelerate the demise of the VB group. Tigers only real business plan is to run a loss till VB go bust, and this deal with Delta only delays this business plan, which means that Tiger slips closer to the edge as Singapore slowly starts to crack the S%^Ts with the whole plan and says, enough is enough, good try, but there is no more cash and your on your own, sink or swim. The new show on TV really helps the cause too, not. I know you get what you pay for, but is that an excuse for a bad service? I don't want to see any airline fail, I have friends at Tiger/Jstar/Vb etc etc. I could not care less who wins the ego race, because this is all about greed, I just hope that the pay goes in for everyone when its meant to, and thats that!
Those in the Ivory Towers can play "mine is bigger than yours", all they like. Who cares!
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Singapore will eventually buy Virgin, it's the only logical outcome...
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From The Australian
Qantas aloof as Air NZ joins Delta V opponents
Steve Creedy, Aviation writer | July 23, 2009
Article from: The Australian
VIRGIN Blue now faces a two-pronged attack on its plan to join forces with Delta Air Lines across the Pacific but Qantas will not formally oppose the move.
Air New Zealand yesterday joined Tiger Airways in opposing the joint venture, saying any benefits to consumers from a tie-up between the two airlines could be achieved by more conventional means.
The Kiwi carrier also pointed to an Australian Competition & Consumer Commission decision last year that denied Air New Zealand permission to work with Air Canada.
"The ACCC's analysis in that instance, if consistently applied to the Virgin-Delta proposal, indicates that this new application is unlikely to succeed," Air NZ general counsel John Blair said yesterday. "We would certainly hope there will be consistency applied."
But Virgin Blue last night called for each of the cases to be reviewed on their merits.
"We've submitted our applications and we believe the ACCC will review each case on its merits and we don't intend to pre-empt their review," it said.
It is understood Qantas, which has a similar agreement with British Airways on the kangaroo route, does not plan to lodge an objection because it believes the legal grounds for such a move in the US are tenuous. It also believes a broader objection would be hard to sustain given the competition and capacity currently on the route.
The fourth player on non-stop flights between Australia and the US mainland, United Airlines, said this week it was still considering its position.
Air NZ's Mr Bair said Virgin and Delta had separately entered the market trumpeting the lower fares they would bring.
However, almost immediately they complained about the ability of competitors to force them out of the market if they were not allowed to collude on price and capacity.
"While we can understand the benefits to the two airlines, most of the benefits they outline for the consumer can be achieved through more usual arrangements such as code sharing," he said.
Tiger, which is backed by Singapore Airlines, last week objected to what it argued was the anti-competitive nature of the tie-up.
Singapore has a long-standing interest in the route, although it has been less enthusiastic since Delta and V Australia started service.
The joint venture, humorously dubbed Delta-V by one observer, would allow Delta and V Australia to pool revenue, collaborate on route and product planning and place passengers on each other's planes. Virgin has argued it would make the two minor players stronger competitors against the incumbent airlines and help ensure their future on the route
Qantas aloof as Air NZ joins Delta V opponents
Steve Creedy, Aviation writer | July 23, 2009
Article from: The Australian
VIRGIN Blue now faces a two-pronged attack on its plan to join forces with Delta Air Lines across the Pacific but Qantas will not formally oppose the move.
Air New Zealand yesterday joined Tiger Airways in opposing the joint venture, saying any benefits to consumers from a tie-up between the two airlines could be achieved by more conventional means.
The Kiwi carrier also pointed to an Australian Competition & Consumer Commission decision last year that denied Air New Zealand permission to work with Air Canada.
"The ACCC's analysis in that instance, if consistently applied to the Virgin-Delta proposal, indicates that this new application is unlikely to succeed," Air NZ general counsel John Blair said yesterday. "We would certainly hope there will be consistency applied."
But Virgin Blue last night called for each of the cases to be reviewed on their merits.
"We've submitted our applications and we believe the ACCC will review each case on its merits and we don't intend to pre-empt their review," it said.
It is understood Qantas, which has a similar agreement with British Airways on the kangaroo route, does not plan to lodge an objection because it believes the legal grounds for such a move in the US are tenuous. It also believes a broader objection would be hard to sustain given the competition and capacity currently on the route.
The fourth player on non-stop flights between Australia and the US mainland, United Airlines, said this week it was still considering its position.
Air NZ's Mr Bair said Virgin and Delta had separately entered the market trumpeting the lower fares they would bring.
However, almost immediately they complained about the ability of competitors to force them out of the market if they were not allowed to collude on price and capacity.
"While we can understand the benefits to the two airlines, most of the benefits they outline for the consumer can be achieved through more usual arrangements such as code sharing," he said.
Tiger, which is backed by Singapore Airlines, last week objected to what it argued was the anti-competitive nature of the tie-up.
Singapore has a long-standing interest in the route, although it has been less enthusiastic since Delta and V Australia started service.
The joint venture, humorously dubbed Delta-V by one observer, would allow Delta and V Australia to pool revenue, collaborate on route and product planning and place passengers on each other's planes. Virgin has argued it would make the two minor players stronger competitors against the incumbent airlines and help ensure their future on the route
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I say again...
They have given up lusting after the Pacific routes in the short term, but once the dust settles and the routes become more stable, they will return. It is the only way the will ever get access to the 'Holy Grail'!
Singapore will eventually buy Virgin,