Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Second airport debate, rebirth?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Second airport debate, rebirth?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2009, 12:50
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the talk of a high speed train system, wasnt there a move for a goulburn airport that was linked to both sydney and canberra by a fast rail system?

that could be a possible solution, worked for tokyo for narita
bdflight is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 22:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For an enlightened discussion on the future of aviation in Australia, including airport expansion, high speed trains etc, please read the following links (hope they work). Some of the best information comes in the comments to the original posts, so please take the time to read.

The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand | The Future of Air Travel?

The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand | A Tale of Profit and Loss - The Future of Air Travel ? Part 2

Some highlights from the articles:


This chart (see article for chart) shows the fairly sobering picture that, with the exception of scenario four and five, both QANTAS and Virgin Blue are likely to become unprofitable between now and 2018. The scenario’s have not been assigned probabilities, however my gut feel is as follows:

The price of jet fuel will continue to increase at or above the current rate as we approach and past peak oil.
Both airlines will slow their capacity growth over the next couple of years before reducing it.
Both airlines will attempt to reduce their non-fuel operating costs, although this may be difficult due to inflation.
Revenue will decrease over time as fewer passengers can afford to travel, due to increases in the cost of air travel and the worsening economic situation associated with the onset of peak oil. I don’t see passenger numbers beginning to fall for a year or two yet, as I don’t think that the pinch from higher fuel prices has as yet significantly changed spending habits (either that or we are just going further into debt?).
This most closely resembles scenario three, meaning that as early as 2010, both of Australia’s major airlines could cease to be profitable. At some point, if they continue to be unprofitable they will become insolvent.(Bold mine)
The Aviation Green Paper forecasts perpetual growth in aviation demand for the foreseeable future. This is based on a number of assumptions, both stated and unstated, that are being invalidated by current events. With no mention of peak oil, or how its impacts will be mitigated, this leads to the unfortunate circumstance where the National Aviation Policy is likely to exacerbate the impact of peak oil on the aviation industry while avoiding the need to develop alternative transport modes such as high speed rail. This will likely leave Australians in the unfortunate situation of having a failing aviation industry with insufficient alternative transportation infrastructure. This situation is however avoidable if peak oil mitigation measures are implemented on a sufficient scale in an urgent manner.
Falling Leaf is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 07:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Springfield
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only problem with SYD:
- Peak hour congestion. Segregate RWY/Terminal use amongst the two parallels, expand domestic terminal to include the existing GA area, and more GA south of Southern Cross Drive. Taxiway limitations preclude efficient ground ops using runway crossings. Redefine separation standards to allow IVA-rate landings during IMC. RE-Define minimum approach speeds during peak hour.

Fallacies with Richmond:
- Townships of Richmond and Windsor. Expansion will be to north & south, alleviating noise concerns. Local communities big economic winner in expansion.
- Railway. This is a slight development cost to move under the future north/south runway.
- Fog. Cat 3 C.
- Road & Rail. This is a slight development cost.
Duff Man is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 07:49
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Springfield
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And to anybody who thinks remote 2nd airports like Southern Highlands or god forbid Newcastle or Goulburn are an idea. Just ask the customers, airlines, and oil companies. "No", "no", and "sorry we can't provide it cheap enough".
Duff Man is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 11:18
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down Under
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vote 1 - YSRI for 2nd Sydney airport

I hope the uniforms leave YSRI and the civilians move in. That way, we don't have to put up with their unconscionable grab for airspace in the Sydney basin.
Bell_Flyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.