Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

ALAEA Leadership Change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jun 2009, 03:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALAEA Leadership Change

Well hopefully not!!!

Then again, the following Qantas press release looks like a changing of the guard at ALAEA is what Qantas is attempting to engineer.
Qantas today strongly refuted claims made by the Federal Secretary of an aviation engineering union regarding maintenance of the aircraft involved in today’s Jetstar inflight incident and diversion to Guam.

Group Executive Qantas Airlines Operations, Mr Lyell Strambi, said the Australian Licenced Aircraft Engineers Association’s (ALAEA) Steve Purvinas was well known for making inflammatory statements and not letting the facts get in the way of his story.

“The A330-200 aircraft involved in this incident was delivered new by Airbus in 2007,” Mr Strambi said. “It has since undergone a number of routine maintenance checks – most recently by Qantas Engineering in Melbourne in May this year, while its one and only heavy maintenance check was done by Lufthansa Technik in Manila in December 2008.

“We don’t resile from this in any way and Mr Purvinas is deliberately twisting words in suggesting Jetstar has tried to link the issue to Qantas engineers in Australia.”

Mr Strambi said the union also knew that: - where Qantas Engineering does not have the capacity to do work in Australia, it is done by reputable overseas providers. They are certified by CASA and Qantas and their work is overseen by on-site Qantas engineers; and- Qantas recently announced that Qantas Group A330 heavy maintenance would be undertaken in Brisbane from 2010.“Qantas always has high levels of oversight in place, so where maintenance takes place is not relevant,” Mr Strambi said.

“Had Mr Purvinas checked his facts and been able to think outside his narrow industrial agenda, as any good engineer would, he would know that the electrical connector that caused the Jetstar incident was not part of the work undertaken in Manila last year. “There has been no requirement to touch this component since the aircraft was delivered, there is no history of it being an issue with our A330 fleet and there have been no directives from Airbus covering this component.

“And had he checked, he would know that the B747 issue referred to was fully and independently investigated by the ATSB. The issue was known to Boeing, which was developing a modification to address it and the ATSB could not link the issue with any previous heavy maintenance work. “Qantas is committed to the highest operational and safety standards, and the ALAEA is slandering the hard work of its members when it makes baseless and ill-informed claims regarding our engineering operations.”

Issued by Qantas Corporate Communication

Unfortunately the tatic is all too familar. The innocent and disinterested will be lead to believe that Qantas and ALAEA could be friends, if only it wasn’t for Purvinas and Mates.

Take the bate, change ALAEA’s Leadership at the next elections and B787 Maintenance will certainly go offshore.


Time to decide if you would rather be cat than a mouse.
Unphased is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 05:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Queensland
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, it looks like Qantas are pointing out the union Federal Secretary is idiot-like (I'm not allowed to call anyone an actual idiot!). And they have done a good job.
TheOtherGuy is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 06:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On Uranus
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas and ALAEA could be friends, if only it wasn’t for Purvinas and Mates.

Hardly........It's been several months since the 'we have to work together and move forward' agenda was touted by the company. The trust is still not there, especially after the Avalon fiasco.

I have been extremely impressed by the team at Bexley. These individuals are very proactive with our interests and have dissminated much information and in a timely manner. I hardly think that any 'buggery' by QF management will have any bearing on the voting of the engineers in the ALAEA.
Anulus Filler is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 09:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: s28e153
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar spokesman Simon Westaway stood by his statements
and told The Age the less than two-year old plane was checked in Australia only last month.
"The last major check on that aircraft is what's called an A-check was undertaken in May of this year
and it was undertaken by Qantas engineering in Australia,'' Mr Westaway said.

Good on you Fed Sec for correcting his mistake...
But Steve Purvinas, the engineers association's federal secretary, said
the Jetstar A330 last underwent major maintenance in Manila in December 2008.

That seems right to me, Line maintenance lames doing A checks is
nothing like a major maintenace check.

And good on you Mr Stambi for correcting Qantas' mistake of
never promoting an inhouse A330 major maintenance program.

ALAEA leadership change?? you've got to be joking right??
division1 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 09:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will definitely be voting them back in.

Most impressed by the way they handled the last EBA negotiations.

Any one that QF management want in I will not be voting for!! Especially after the previous QF stooges that were in when SYD HM closed down and they stood back and let it happen with no reaction for weeks. And also EBA where we accepted less in the 2nd vote than the 1st vote??
Quill Shaft is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 10:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
If these guys stand, they'll win.Over and out.
no one is perfect, SP can say the wrong thing at times, we all do.
its just the usual argy bargy of "interests' marking their territory.

An A chk is a fairly low level maintenance check.For Mr Strambi to call it a major chk is nonsense.

Trying to draw attention to this incident without due proof it is due to any OS maintenance also nonsense.

However, the public belief is out there that OS maint is causing trouble.
On those grounds one nil to the alaea. The buses are coming back here and good on qantas for doing so whatever the reasons.

As proof of what was successful and what was not how many of the get tough / buggery campaign are still employed at qantas.Very few.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 22:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The majority of the engineers are not stupid and can see past the usual QF rhetoric. These statements are usually made to protect QF's image with the travelling public. We all know whats going on......

Take the bate, change ALAEA’s Leadership at the next elections and B787 Maintenance will certainly go offshore.

Is QF doing the A380?

Mr Strambi said the union also knew that: - where Qantas Engineering does not have the capacity to do work in Australia
Well we once did. http://www.aviationnews.com.au/PastI.../P17(0206).pdf http://www.travelmole.com/stories/107740.php

Companies are run by individuals, Unions are run by their members. Hence when you take a swipe at a union you are taking a swipe at the workforce it represents.

Last edited by Ngineer; 15th Jun 2009 at 07:14.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 23:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the company would try whatever tactics it can to get rid of Steve before our next eba is due because they are **** scared of having to deal with him again.

I hope he is still there as he did a great job last time.
torquebox is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2009, 00:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must say that during my time at the Helm of AIPA, I worked with the Cousins/Purvinas Team on a number of maintenance matters and believe that ALAEA's current Leadership has the Insight, Courage and Determination to drive sustainable, pragmatic outcomes.

I sincerely hope that the Lame Membership has the collective wisdom to understand and endorse what Steve's strong leadership has and will achieve.

Regards to All

WoodenEye is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2009, 06:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I don't work for QF I can't comment on the A330 maintenance issue. However, I have met Steve, and can say that he is passionate in looking after the interests of all the ALAEA members.
Good on you Steve and keep up the good work
Toolman101 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.