Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A320 Ditching

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2009, 07:25
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
It seems like the crew could not have bee more experienced.

The more I read about it the more it makes me smile, a situation like that is what every pilot fears but is an amazing achievement to land without those fears being realised.
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2009, 01:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
This quote on Capt Sullenbergers Facebook fan page took my fancy...

DUDE! THE CLANKING OF YOUR NADS SHALL FOREVER HERALD YOUR APPROACH! HELLAGREAT LANDING MAN!
Just brilliant!
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2009, 06:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Top of Descent
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corny but a bit of fun.........

Free online game lets players be Hudson River hero pilots

January 31, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO (AFP) - A free computer game went online Friday that challenges players to become the next "Hero on the Hudson" by safely landing a virtual passenger jet on the New York City waterway.

The streamed game warns players that both jet engines are disabled, it is impossible to make it to an airport, and they must crash land in the Hudson River in a virtual version of the US Airways miracle landing on January 15.

"The fate of the passengers in your hands," reads an introductory page of the game available online at tastyplay.com.

Players then use left and right arrow keys to keep an animated jet parallel to the surface of the faux river as it makes an emergency descent with dark smoke billowing from its engines.

Level landings are reward with a banner proclaiming the player a hero as tiny figures representing passengers file onto the wings. Sloppy landings are met with the sight and sound of a sinking jet.

The pilot of the US Airways jet that crash landed in icy waters off New York in real life was hailed as a hero for coolly saving 155 passengers and crew.

The former fighter pilot was lauded for smoothly landing the jet belly-first onto the Hudson River.

The soft landing allowed passengers to safely escape from the stricken craft.
Shlonghaul is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2009, 07:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with Obie, typical drivel from the people that bought us the current world economic situation, but I digress........................

>First Officer Jeffrey B. Skiles, joined US Airways (USAir) in 1986. He has a total of 15,643 flight hours and previously flew as Captain with US Airways.
You're 5hittin' me right ? 23 years as an F/O ? That is hard core devotion
hongkongfooey is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 22:59
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From AvWeb today

FAA Releases US Air 1549 ATC Audio: Hear It in This Podcast

Now is it me or is our ATC system and controllers far more "in control" than the US folk?

I am amazed they do not have more accidents. I have never heard any of our approach, enroute or towers sound this crazy. And its not just this one instance. Maybe I just miss out on the busy stuff!

More importantly, the Cactus flight ....which was pretty cactus by this point, the transmissions are pretty much clear of what was happening.

What do the Pro's think?

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 23:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To me, it would appear that the urgency of the situation was lost on ATC for the simple fact that there was never a MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY.

Had this been declared I would probably think ATC would have understood the gravity of the situation a little faster.

It obviously sounds like Capt Sullenberger was making the radio transmissions. That being the case, are we giving the wrong guy credit for this miraculous landing?
Merlins Magic is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 23:57
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
????

I can't think of anything more serious or urgent than saying they had lost thrust from both engines and were going into the Hudson.
I think the controller was bery helpful, giving information on local airfields and headings to get there.
bushy is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 05:05
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: On the move
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Merlins Magic

It obviously sounds like Capt Sullenberger was making the radio transmissions. That being the case, are we giving the wrong guy credit for this miraculous landing?
In these situations the Pilot Flying (PF) flys and does R/T while the Pilot Monitoring (PM) works like a one arm paper hangar with all the ECAMs and paper checklists.

In terms of the MAYDAY. It would have been good to hear and is usually standard procedure but I don't think it would've made a lick of difference as Sullenberger made it clear beyond doubt that he had lost both engines, which was acknowledged by the controller.
otto the grot is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 05:56
  #29 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the CVR transcript, a Mayday call was made but not received. Possibly due to a blocked transmission?
HotDog is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 11:11
  #30 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,440
Received 225 Likes on 120 Posts
tail wheel is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 11:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In these situations the Pilot Flying (PF) flys and does R/T while the Pilot Monitoring (PM) works like a one arm paper hangar with all the ECAMs and paper checklists.
Not in any Airline I have worked at. In my experience, the PF flys the aircraft and the NFP makes all R/T and conducts Recall/QRH/Checklist items all on confirmation of the PF.
Merlins Magic is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 12:21
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,096
Received 481 Likes on 129 Posts

I am amazed they do not have more accidents. I have never heard any of our approach, enroute or towers sound this crazy. And its not just this one instance. Maybe I just miss out on the busy stuff!
I'm up and down the Ausi east coast a fair bit and it didn't strike me as being "crazy" at all. It gets much busier than that in many places. I imagine for the NY controllers that was a slow period! I was pretty impressed with the cotrollers and don't think a mayday would have made any diference. He knew exactly how serious it was I reckon. he was just giving the crew all the options/help he could think of. Good work all round.
framer is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 09:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: On the move
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Merlins Magic

I'm sorry to say but it is standard Airbus procedure for the PF to immediately take over R/T while PM plays with ECAM.
otto the grot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.