Virgin Blue Cuts Fuel Surcharge
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 38,000 ft
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin Blue Cuts Fuel Surcharge
Herald Sun November 11, 2008 01:30pm
VIRGIN Blue has become the latest airline to reduce flight fees by cutting the fuel surcharge on its airfares by 20 per cent.
The airline has slashed surcharge fees on Virgin Blue domestic, Pacific Blue trans-Tasman and Pacific Island flights.
The fuel surcharge for a one-way domestic flight will fall to $19 and to $35 for Pacific Blue and Polynesian Blue one way international flights.
"We have always promised that if the cost of fuel reversed, we would gladly reverse the surcharge accordingly," said chief executive Brett Godfrey.
"That is what we are doing, because that is fair."
Virgin Blue last increased its fuel surcharge in February 2008 in response to successive record hikes in the cost of jet fuel.
The airline said it had resisted further fuel surcharge increases when oil reached record peaks of $US145 a barrel in July.
VIRGIN Blue has become the latest airline to reduce flight fees by cutting the fuel surcharge on its airfares by 20 per cent.
The airline has slashed surcharge fees on Virgin Blue domestic, Pacific Blue trans-Tasman and Pacific Island flights.
The fuel surcharge for a one-way domestic flight will fall to $19 and to $35 for Pacific Blue and Polynesian Blue one way international flights.
"We have always promised that if the cost of fuel reversed, we would gladly reverse the surcharge accordingly," said chief executive Brett Godfrey.
"That is what we are doing, because that is fair."
Virgin Blue last increased its fuel surcharge in February 2008 in response to successive record hikes in the cost of jet fuel.
The airline said it had resisted further fuel surcharge increases when oil reached record peaks of $US145 a barrel in July.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel surcharge
Maybe Virgin should have kept the surcharge on and removed a row of seats so that they could increase the seat pitch a little. SYD-PTH in the 737-800 was painful, and I'm only 175cm. The PTH-SYD sector in the -700 was only less painful because it was about 80 mins shorter.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 38,000 ft
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QF reduced their fuel surcharge a few weeks ago.
Sydney, 08 October 2008
Qantas announced today it would reduce its international fuel surcharges in response to recent falls in oil and jet fuel prices.
Qantas announced today it would reduce its international fuel surcharges in response to recent falls in oil and jet fuel prices.
Mr Borghetti said the surcharge reduction would be accompanied by domestic fare reductions.
"Qantas domestic and QantasLink regional fares across a range of routes will be reduced by approximately 2-3 per cent"ť he said.
"Qantas domestic and QantasLink regional fares across a range of routes will be reduced by approximately 2-3 per cent"ť he said.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wirgin Blew...
Erm... Thats 2% to 3% of the TOTAL FARE vs 20% of the Surcharge. Works out to a pretty similar amount for a standard domestic fare. Funny that.
Erm... Thats 2% to 3% of the TOTAL FARE vs 20% of the Surcharge. Works out to a pretty similar amount for a standard domestic fare. Funny that.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The World
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comfy Chair
I suggest you use a calculator next time ...$19 is 2% of a $950 fare and 3% of a $630 fare. On VB you are looking at sectors of 2.5 hours or greater before the QF 2-3% fare cut is even close
VB fares Bne - Syd and Mel - Syd full economy $350 @ 2% = $7 @ 3% =$10.50 ....... Bne - Mel $500 @2% = $10 @3% = $15
With many cheaper fares in the market the 20% fuel surcharge cut delivers a far greater saving than a similar QF 2-3% fare cut would.
Thats 2% to 3% of the TOTAL FARE vs 20% of the Surcharge. Works out to a pretty similar amount for a standard domestic fare. Funny that.
VB fares Bne - Syd and Mel - Syd full economy $350 @ 2% = $7 @ 3% =$10.50 ....... Bne - Mel $500 @2% = $10 @3% = $15
With many cheaper fares in the market the 20% fuel surcharge cut delivers a far greater saving than a similar QF 2-3% fare cut would.
Fool levy or fuel surcharge? Cheap oil hurts airline credibility
From today's crikey.com.au
Fool levy or fuel surcharge? Cheap oil hurts airline credibility
Ben Sandilands writes:
The airlines are scrambling today to deal with fuel below the $US 55 parity pricing benchmark, which makes their fuel surcharges look like a blatant rip-off.
This morning AirAsia abolished its surcharges, including on its AirAsia X long haul operations from Australia, and threw in half a million free flights (for the middle of next year) in a PR double whammy.
Earlier today Tiger Airways responded to Plane Talking’s blog entry on their possible abolition in this market with a sarcastic statement of amazement “that other airlines that had no hesitation in immediately increasing their surcharges when fuel went up have not immediately removed them once it has dropped by 60%.”
Tiger has never imposed a fuel surcharge. Its low cost rival Jetstar only started charging them after Qantas ordered it to fall into line with its policy of extrapolating fuel spikes into estimated extra full year costs and then setting a levy which was always described as failing to recover the total increase.
Qantas and Singapore Airlines recently, and Virgin Blue yesterday, have slashed their surcharges, but the reality is that the collapsed oil price will make their customers feel just as cheated as motorists are when service stations take forever to follow the benchmark down, but always put it up the moment oil goes up.
Of course there was a bit of sweet sorrow for other airlines and travellers this week when Cathay Pacific revealed that it had been ripped off by a hedge fund, sources say it is Lehman Bros, which is said to have taken close to half a billion dollars off it in a contract for fuel it won’t deliver because it went broke.
Qantas is insured against the consequences of a fuel price collapse just as it is hedged against higher prices. But all of this costs additional fees, and a spokesman this morning said that “at current prices and after hedging and fuel saving measures, the Qantas Group's 2008/09 fuel bill will still be more than $1billion higher than in 2007/08."
Maybe the airlines should have ditched fuel surcharges a long time ago and just varied the fares to cope with fluctuations, which is what Tiger really does and Jetstar once did.
It really does take up to three months for fuel price changes to make it into the tanks of airliners, but after four years of immediate increases and reluctant, drawn out decreases to levies, the punters aren’t likely to listen to "reason".
Ben Sandilands writes:
The airlines are scrambling today to deal with fuel below the $US 55 parity pricing benchmark, which makes their fuel surcharges look like a blatant rip-off.
This morning AirAsia abolished its surcharges, including on its AirAsia X long haul operations from Australia, and threw in half a million free flights (for the middle of next year) in a PR double whammy.
Earlier today Tiger Airways responded to Plane Talking’s blog entry on their possible abolition in this market with a sarcastic statement of amazement “that other airlines that had no hesitation in immediately increasing their surcharges when fuel went up have not immediately removed them once it has dropped by 60%.”
Tiger has never imposed a fuel surcharge. Its low cost rival Jetstar only started charging them after Qantas ordered it to fall into line with its policy of extrapolating fuel spikes into estimated extra full year costs and then setting a levy which was always described as failing to recover the total increase.
Qantas and Singapore Airlines recently, and Virgin Blue yesterday, have slashed their surcharges, but the reality is that the collapsed oil price will make their customers feel just as cheated as motorists are when service stations take forever to follow the benchmark down, but always put it up the moment oil goes up.
Of course there was a bit of sweet sorrow for other airlines and travellers this week when Cathay Pacific revealed that it had been ripped off by a hedge fund, sources say it is Lehman Bros, which is said to have taken close to half a billion dollars off it in a contract for fuel it won’t deliver because it went broke.
Qantas is insured against the consequences of a fuel price collapse just as it is hedged against higher prices. But all of this costs additional fees, and a spokesman this morning said that “at current prices and after hedging and fuel saving measures, the Qantas Group's 2008/09 fuel bill will still be more than $1billion higher than in 2007/08."
Maybe the airlines should have ditched fuel surcharges a long time ago and just varied the fares to cope with fluctuations, which is what Tiger really does and Jetstar once did.
It really does take up to three months for fuel price changes to make it into the tanks of airliners, but after four years of immediate increases and reluctant, drawn out decreases to levies, the punters aren’t likely to listen to "reason".
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tangan, I suggest that you read what Virgin Blue actually did.
They did not reduce their surcharge BY $19, but by 20% TO $19. That means the surcharge reduction is less than $5.
Using your figures for the full fare economy 2% and 3% reductions, being $7 and $10.50 you have, in fact, proven that on a full fare economy ticket, Qantas has reduced it by more!
They did not reduce their surcharge BY $19, but by 20% TO $19. That means the surcharge reduction is less than $5.
Using your figures for the full fare economy 2% and 3% reductions, being $7 and $10.50 you have, in fact, proven that on a full fare economy ticket, Qantas has reduced it by more!
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If I book early enough am are flexible with travel time, I can often fly QF for the same price as VB!
If the boss is paying though, we seem to always fly Virgin.
If the boss is paying though, we seem to always fly Virgin.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2 Years Ago
I did a quick search and found this article from Oct 2006.
The Age Blogs: Travel
So 2 years ago QF had the levy at $31 a domestic leg whilst the article states, "oil prices have slid to around $59 a barrel compared with $70 earlier in the year."
Article also states that "Virgin Blue's fuel levy has remained unchanged since April 2005."
So 2 years later, oil prices have slid to under $59 a barrel.
?
The Age Blogs: Travel
So 2 years ago QF had the levy at $31 a domestic leg whilst the article states, "oil prices have slid to around $59 a barrel compared with $70 earlier in the year."
Article also states that "Virgin Blue's fuel levy has remained unchanged since April 2005."
So 2 years later, oil prices have slid to under $59 a barrel.
?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fuel surcharge
Regarding the fuel surchages, just remember that Australian airlines are paying for it in US dollars (which has dropped) and in addition, aviation fuel is more expensive than other fuel.
Airlines like Tiger didn't have a fuel surcharge perhaps because they save money in other ways. eg: less advertising, less pay etc...
Airlines like Tiger didn't have a fuel surcharge perhaps because they save money in other ways. eg: less advertising, less pay etc...
