Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Can jets work on Regional/Provincial routes?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Can jets work on Regional/Provincial routes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2008, 12:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,307
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Quite right Chimbu.

And REX own outright virtually all of their fleet!
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2008, 12:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Working as in, focussing specifically on those sectors.... sorry there wasnt the clarity around my comment. apologies.
KittyBlue is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2008, 00:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chimbu,

Your couple of lines says it all!

Good business sense says you apply your assets to where you can make the most money. In DJ's case their press releases indicate the EJets primary role was to improve yield (through lower costs) on routes and times that were marginally viable for the 737 and then to use any residual EJet capacity to fly their flag in regional markets capable of supporting the aircraft.

The above business case, however, depended on the price of fuel remaining low and now that fuel is at an historically high price (and may remain so) the business case for the smaller aircraft no longer makes sense as the unit price (for the EJet) has become uncompetitive against the competition (i.e. other jet operators on trunk routes [and turboprop operators on regional routes). Accordingly the DJ board has now deferred some EJet scheduled deliveries (I expect with attendent penalty costs) and they appear to be re-assessing the business case!

The 'tilt' at MQL-MEL seems to be an attempt to set up a typical 'hub and spoke' arrangement, however, these only succeed when there is real frequency from the 'feeder' aircraft into the 'hub' and in time to fill the larger aircraft. A once a day service, however, won't satisfy the needs of the MQL market and any increase in frequency (in Albury, Mildura or Port Macquarie) dilutes their assests from profitable trunk competition.!!

Qantaslink has announced they will be operate the Q400 on certain SYD/ABX services, so it will be interesting to see how the extra capacity affects the EJet business if the 'Link' opt's for any parallel scheduling with DJ.

Alternatively, the Q400 could be parallel scheduled with some of the REX services, however, the REX cost base will enable them to always guarantee the cheapest fare on the day and still make a profit!! Perhaps, if the Q400 proves to be a potent weapon against the EJet they might also consider operating MEL/MQL in the future.

It remains interesting times for airlines in Australia!

Last edited by THE ORACLE; 12th Aug 2008 at 02:37.
THE ORACLE is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.