Virgin cuts OOL Flights
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin may cut OOL Flights
VIRGIN Blue is set to whack the beleaguered tourism industry, flagging a new luggage tax for passengers and cutting flights to the Gold Coast.
Virgin Blue chief executive Brett Godfrey said skyrocketing fuel prices and greater security-screening processes had combined to severely increase check-in costs.
The budget carrier has also put Coolangatta services on the chopping block only days after the State Government delivered a $4 million rescue package when Qantas and Jetstar revealed flights between Cairns and Japan would be slashed.
"A bag costs us more to put through an aeroplane than a passenger," Mr Godfrey told Channel Nine.
"There's markets such as Coolangatta that has seen a 40-odd per cent increase (in) capacity this year, so even though that has been a profitable route for us in the past, maybe we have too much in there."
His comments came as Premier Anna Bligh stepped up her calls for national help as she labelled the issue one of "national significance" given the visitors Queensland attracts who travel elsewhere around Australia. The State Government has been criticised over the past week after the Tourism Queensland budget was cut by $3 million before the rescue package emerged.
Federal Tourism Minister Martin Ferguson yesterday refused to comment on suggestions the Commonwealth was planning an assistance package for tourism operators.
But he said: "The problems facing the Queensland and Australian tourism sector are significant and require a serious, properly considered, strategic response rather than a knee-jerk reaction."
Ms Bligh insisted national help was needed given the "ripple effect" the state's tourism had across the nation.
"There has been discussions with the Federal Government (and) I expect we will hear something from Canberra in the not-too-distant future," Ms Bligh said.
"This is of national significance. This is not just an issue for Queensland."
Mr Ferguson said key stakeholders would meet with Tourism Australia and Queensland Tourism this week to work on a response.
Queensland Tourism Council chief executive Daniel Gschwind said tourism was a shared responsibility between states and the Commonwealth.
Virgin Blue chief executive Brett Godfrey said skyrocketing fuel prices and greater security-screening processes had combined to severely increase check-in costs.
The budget carrier has also put Coolangatta services on the chopping block only days after the State Government delivered a $4 million rescue package when Qantas and Jetstar revealed flights between Cairns and Japan would be slashed.
"A bag costs us more to put through an aeroplane than a passenger," Mr Godfrey told Channel Nine.
"There's markets such as Coolangatta that has seen a 40-odd per cent increase (in) capacity this year, so even though that has been a profitable route for us in the past, maybe we have too much in there."
His comments came as Premier Anna Bligh stepped up her calls for national help as she labelled the issue one of "national significance" given the visitors Queensland attracts who travel elsewhere around Australia. The State Government has been criticised over the past week after the Tourism Queensland budget was cut by $3 million before the rescue package emerged.
Federal Tourism Minister Martin Ferguson yesterday refused to comment on suggestions the Commonwealth was planning an assistance package for tourism operators.
But he said: "The problems facing the Queensland and Australian tourism sector are significant and require a serious, properly considered, strategic response rather than a knee-jerk reaction."
Ms Bligh insisted national help was needed given the "ripple effect" the state's tourism had across the nation.
"There has been discussions with the Federal Government (and) I expect we will hear something from Canberra in the not-too-distant future," Ms Bligh said.
"This is of national significance. This is not just an issue for Queensland."
Mr Ferguson said key stakeholders would meet with Tourism Australia and Queensland Tourism this week to work on a response.
Queensland Tourism Council chief executive Daniel Gschwind said tourism was a shared responsibility between states and the Commonwealth.
Queensland seems to be seriously hit now, with QF, JQ and DJ all reducing flights.
Last edited by lc_461; 9th Jun 2008 at 07:15. Reason: title
Metrosexual
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Enroute
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coolangatta Airport might have been ok when 4 767's a day went in there, but with the volume of passengers going in there now, it is so far off the mark facilities wise, it's a joke.
In real terms, it's not much better than a cattle yard - except a cattle yard at least has rails to guide the cattle to the right place.
Maybe the QLD government can aid the QLD tourist industry by spending up big and taking the next 10 years to build a 'modern' terminal facility that will be out-dated and way off the mark capacity wise anyway.
In real terms, it's not much better than a cattle yard - except a cattle yard at least has rails to guide the cattle to the right place.
Maybe the QLD government can aid the QLD tourist industry by spending up big and taking the next 10 years to build a 'modern' terminal facility that will be out-dated and way off the mark capacity wise anyway.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shouldn't the title of this thread be 'Virgin may cut OOL Flights', has Virgin have not announced any cuts yet?
If they do cut back flights to OOL , my guess it will be MEL-OOL flights that will be reduced, considering you have Virgin, Jetstar and Tiger operating the route.
Plans have been released for the new Terminal at OOL
If they do cut back flights to OOL , my guess it will be MEL-OOL flights that will be reduced, considering you have Virgin, Jetstar and Tiger operating the route.
Plans have been released for the new Terminal at OOL
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since TT arrived, there is now an extra 540 seats up to OOL every day, so surely this would effect JQ/DJ. DJ dont offer as much return flights ex MEL as JQ, but they have a whopping 12 flights a day per leg ex SYD, so thats like 2000 seats each way per day(and this is only DJ!)
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True they do have a lot of flights ex SYD, but cut 1 return from ML (a reduction of 288-320 seats) and feed those pax via SYD (just like the old days) and increase the load factor/yield on those flights.
Have a listen to BG's comments regarding reducing flights and he gives some clues. The routes they are looking are reducing will still have connections available within the network.
Have a listen to BG's comments regarding reducing flights and he gives some clues. The routes they are looking are reducing will still have connections available within the network.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would you rather a direct flight, or a connection/stopover in Sydney? Direct Flight please! I see virgin charges are quite high if you want a connection via some ports.
Average Daily Seats(all carriers):
SYD-OOL= 3770seats or 23 flights per leg
MEL-OOL= 3030seats or 20 flights per leg
Now thats alot of bums of seats
Average Daily Seats(all carriers):
SYD-OOL= 3770seats or 23 flights per leg
MEL-OOL= 3030seats or 20 flights per leg
Now thats alot of bums of seats
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We would all like direct flights, but hey in the Ansett/TAA days direct flights just didn't happen. A good example was CBR-BNE, with most (if not all) flights going via SYD. ie DC9 to SYD then 727 to BNE.
Jet A Knight
What are you talking about -
'Maybe the QLD government can aid the QLD tourist industry by spending up big and taking the next 10 years to build a 'modern' terminal facility that will be out-dated and way off the mark capacity wise anyway".
The QLD government is not the operator of the OOL airport.
See ASX listed company Australian Infrastructure Fund (AIX)
'Maybe the QLD government can aid the QLD tourist industry by spending up big and taking the next 10 years to build a 'modern' terminal facility that will be out-dated and way off the mark capacity wise anyway".
The QLD government is not the operator of the OOL airport.
See ASX listed company Australian Infrastructure Fund (AIX)
Metrosexual
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Enroute
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Breathe taken
My insinuation - if you like - is that if the QLD govt wants to help, they should not sell off vital infrastructure, and make improvements to the same.....sarcastically, also implying that infrastructure that is usually built is usually obsolete by the time it is finished.
YBCG is a crap airport for the amount of movement going through it. The facilities are rudimentary at best, and a real pain in the rear end as a pax, and as an operator.
You want people to come to Queensland?
Then make it easy for them and not a loss leader for the operators.
Oh, and an ILS might be nice too, considering the weather.
Shiiiit, aerobridges for the punters whilst we're at it.
My insinuation - if you like - is that if the QLD govt wants to help, they should not sell off vital infrastructure, and make improvements to the same.....sarcastically, also implying that infrastructure that is usually built is usually obsolete by the time it is finished.
YBCG is a crap airport for the amount of movement going through it. The facilities are rudimentary at best, and a real pain in the rear end as a pax, and as an operator.
You want people to come to Queensland?
Then make it easy for them and not a loss leader for the operators.
Oh, and an ILS might be nice too, considering the weather.
Shiiiit, aerobridges for the punters whilst we're at it.