Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Tulla to go Cat 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jun 2008, 23:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
QF 737 crew are low viz qualified. The jet has been approved for Cat II ops.
Capt_SNAFU is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 00:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ozmate
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF 737 crews have also been trained in low vis T/Offs to 75m and hand flown CatIII approaches using the HUD but the regulators are dragging the chain.
woftam is online now  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 01:30
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 170 Likes on 87 Posts
autolands carried out by aircraft on approved runways using low viz procedures at least once every rolling 35 days
The aircraft have to have at least one autoland every 45 days
Any advance on 35 or 45 days ....
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 01:54
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From ze book:

"the autoland facility must be exercised at least once every 45
days"
blueloo is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 02:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 306
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the answer about the radar and the link to those black boxes at the end of the runway.

In this technological age, how expensive would it be to maintain a CATIII system? Surely alot of equipment these days has built in test facilities. With flight testing, it used to be done in an F28 now a king air. Surely it could be done in a turboprop single. Wouldn't even have to be pressurised.
clark y is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 02:50
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not so simple

Different days for different aircraft types. Different days for aircraft and pilots too.
Nuthinondaclock is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 03:13
  #27 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
fish

Any advance on 35 or 45 days ....
Oops. Typo on my part. Sorry about that!
Keg is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 04:29
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg,

You must be referring to Boeing trash

We're told that our A330s continue their currency and approval on the basis of Bite tests conducted regularly by the engineering types.

Those of us up the front have to do a practise one only every 90 days.

Every 35 days for someone on the 744 would effectively mean every fourth landing would have to be an autoland - bugger! All the fun's been taken out of the job...

Come across from the dark side
RAD_ALT_ALIVE is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 04:36
  #29 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

Come across from the dark side
I'm like Luke Skywalker. I can't be seduced by the dark side!

I figure I've spent so many years bagging Airbus philosophy that I can't reasonably bid to go to it now. If QF ends up going all Airbus one day I'll take great pride in being the last Boeing pilot.....as long as I outlast Going Boeing!
Keg is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 07:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Hey Keg, as you know, I'll be retired well before you so you will outlast me.

As for
Those of us up the front have to do a practise one only every 90 days.
RAD_ALT_ALIVE, my understanding is that you Hyundai drivers never really fly the aircraft - effectively the aircraft does every landing thus you don't need to practice autolands as often as us "big balled" Boeing pilots. Airbus designed their aircraft to be difficult to hand fly so even those who wish to maintain their flying skills end up leaving it to full automatics. It's all part of their dastardly plan to design pilots out of aeroplanes - that's what CEO's like Darth (Dark Side) Dixon want.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2008, 11:00
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amend my previous re black boxes in melb, they measure wake turb for departures.
aussiegal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.