Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar Agree not to hire Qantaslink Pilots

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar Agree not to hire Qantaslink Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Mar 2008, 11:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: house
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr Jetstar Agree not to hire Qantaslink Pilots

I heard that Jetstar has made a non-formal commitment with M Day vee not to hire any more pilots from Qantaslink? Can anyone confirm this?
If this is the case, any aspiring jetstar pilot would be knee-capping themselves from a career with jetstar by joining Q'link. Something to think about...
MyAngle is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 11:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not Syderknee
Posts: 1,012
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The more you hear these type of things the more you wonder just how big a gun they are using to shoot themselves in the foot.


They would solve most their crewing problems by offering a progression from QLink into Mainline. Pilots would queue up to spend a few years Right seat of a Dash then a few Left and then the opportunity to move into the big jets. Plus then QANTAS would have a supply of experienced and tested pilots for the Jets.

Actually that’s starting to sound a bit like recycling....
rmcdonal is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 12:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep North
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar Agree not to hire Qantaslink Pilots

RMC, I have been perusing posts on this site for a number of years. Your succinct post is the clearest simplest paradigm for success on so many levels!

Well Spoken!

Regards

Lucky
LUCKY-1 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 12:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,308
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Just like the deal between REX and Virgin! Pleeese!

Jetstar must crew their aircraft. DJ must crew theirs. I wonder if the managers of the regional airlines can actually add? Because the numbers do not add up. The number of pilots required by the major airlines over the next 2-3 years greatly exceeds the total number of qualified pilots currently not employed by these airlines.

So what will DJ, Jetstar, QF do? Continue to employ as many qualified pilots as they need, or will they cancel their multi million dollar aircraft orders to protect the viability of the smaller operators.

What will the Regional Airlines do? Continue to lose people they cannot replace, or will they actively compete for labour and save their business.

It's not rocket science, but you could be excused for thinking it is!
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 12:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The Land Downunder
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess Jetstar and Qantaslink will just have to think about hiring foreign pilots....... oop's they already have started doing that!!! Makes sense to me that one subsidiary wouldn't put into jeopardy the operations of another by recruiting pilots from their ranks.
Artificial Horizon is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 14:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you would find this sort of behaviour illegal? If it could be proven then the IRC and the union movement would have a field day. We all know nothing is secret in aviation and this sort of deal woud get a spotlight on it pretty quick. MD wouldnt want to try this **** on otherwise the drama bomb would be nuclear in magnitude.
DeafStar is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 21:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think most QLink pilots call jetstar a last resort anyway...

Its all good, we'll just keep going to the opposition.

Last edited by Friction Nut; 24th Mar 2008 at 21:56. Reason: Grammer
Friction Nut is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 23:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Illegal-Restraint of trade, discrimination...etc.

Of course, what was I thinking, QANTAS so the norms of legality, morality don't apply !
Shark Slayer is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 23:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
MyAngle, your theory makes no sense. The QF "organisation" would have greater concern in productivity of their capital equipment, rather than regional air services. To the contrary, I believe an ability to progress from regional to mainline does exist, under certain circumstances.

And if you were correct, in the absence of industrial seniority between corporate units of the QF "organisation", I doubt the IRC would have any jurisdiction or interest.
Torres is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2008, 23:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ozmate
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We should all know by now that Oz airline "management" is reactive and not proactive.
The penny will finally drop with these people when A/C are parked and not a second before.
Progression to mainline is the answer to so many problems that the QF group faces re crewing levels. Why is that so hard for these clowns to understand?
They would rather lose pilots to the opposition.
Gee...............that makes sense !!!!!
woftam is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 00:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 52
Posts: 845
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
MyAngle,

yes i can confirm this, it happened to me over a period of years. mark davey prevented me(and many others) from an opportunity with jetstar.

the solution was quite simple, within weeks of virgin blue announcing a sydney base i applied and was successfull(like many others).

in a nutshell, avoid qantaslink if you want to move within the qantas group.

regards hoss.

ps. i even managed to activate the lights at launy the other night.

Last edited by hoss; 25th Mar 2008 at 00:12. Reason: transfer bus off light illuminated!
hoss is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 00:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RMC, I have been perusing posts on this site for a number of years. Your succinct post is the clearest simplest paradigm for success on so many levels!

Well Spoken!

Regards

Lucky
Macca, quick, get to the pub, there is still time to save you!

The PM is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 03:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uranus
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deafstar, clearly from your post you are only a spectator in the Australian Aviation industry,

Quote...I think you would find this sort of behaviour illegal? If it could be proven then the IRC and the union movement would have a field day. We all know nothing is secret in aviation and this sort of deal woud get a spotlight on it pretty quick. MD wouldnt want to try this **** on otherwise the drama bomb would be nuclear in magnitude."

Well it does, and has been for a long time and you just work with it. The only movement that the union's have in Australia that involves aviation is the one around lunch time whilst reading the paper.
CAPTBOB is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 03:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If this is the case, any aspiring jetstar pilot would be knee-capping themselves from a career with jetstar by joining Q'link
My Angle

And........Setting themselves up for a potential career in mainline, considering the opportunities available. Some have recently progressed to mainline after less than 6 months in QFlink.

Krusty 34

Have to agree with you there. If J* are travelling as far a field as Europe & South Africa to source their pilots the surely then wouldnt discount QFlink.

Besides, there are employment laws in the form of anti-discrimination & equal opportunity that would prohibit such activity.

I think most QLink pilots call jetstar a last resort anyway...
Friction Nut : Have to agree with you there. The use of career & jetstar in the same sentance by My Angle is a an interesting angle.

Hoss: How did MD prevent you from going to J*? The same way he's preventing all the current QFlink pilots joining mainline.

CAPTBOB: What makes the airline industry any different from any other when it comes to employment law in Australia?

One must ask themselves: Why are QF mainline sending mainline cadets to QFlink & not Jetstar, when both are short of pilots?

MC

Last edited by Mstr Caution; 25th Mar 2008 at 10:08.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 03:49
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: brisbane
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar is not a career, it's merely a stepping stone.........
qfpaypacket is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 03:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In my suitcase
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This not new boys and girls

I hate to be a bearer of bad news, this has been unofficially happening for years and years. First QF and then Jetstar, they will just allow a few to go from time to time that way nobody can say they are being discriminated against for working at Qlink. Boys and girls left at Qlink pack your bags and go, each and everyone of you can fly jets don't listen to the f**** at QF, flying a Jet is easier than flying a Dash 8, can't remember last time I did a night circling approach with low cloud and poor vis..
oldsmithy is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2008, 23:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Noosa Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GG

Hoss, heard a lot about this sort of stuff over the years and more of late with some at Sunnies.Just what are you saying every ones best mate did to upset yours and others progression?
grumpy greyhound is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 00:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really wanted to be an Astronaut for NASA.

I know I dont have a degree, wear glasses, I'm too short, my blood pressure is a little high & I didnt pass the NASA phych tests.

But I'm sure the real reason I got knocked back was the QF group got into NASA's ear about the pilot shortage in Aus.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 05:23
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 40
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard on the grapevine that they have just started progressing some QLINK drivers into mainline.. anyone else confirm this?? Or is there only a VERY select few that get lucky and get to progress through..

Why are the most simpliest solutions always the last to be put into play!!
Captain Biggles84 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 06:04
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wherever the hotel drink ticket is valid
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can think of half a dozen off the top of my head, some of whom were also accepted by JQ. Pays to note that several have gone through within a year of entering QL, and so don't qualify to have elements of the entry requirements waived.

Whilst management certainly do have a lot to answer for, I thank we can agree that the writing is on the wall at the moment. Job applications with other carriers are openly discussed in crew rooms, and the number going to VB makes it obvious that you can't keep hold of a decent pilot by simply denying them a job elsewhere in the group.

Why then would anyone waste their time setting up an informal agreement which does not succeed in retaining pilots in the group, further endangers morale, and which by-the-way is illegal.

Plenty of people from QL are getting jet jobs domestically and internationally (or haven't you heard - we have a shortage). If you're not one of them time to stop blaming it on the one-armed man. Perhaps spend your time doing something constructive instead?
Icarus53 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.