Jackson at it again
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aircraft
GET LOST!
Any takers?
lowerlobe asked me this question.
When I answered "the board and executive" he effectively said that I was wrong. So, who could it be? It can't be the sharemarket itself!
I would like to hear lowerlobe's answer, but if anybody else knows, please tell!
I said that the market is interpreted and influenced by Perception and Information.Now where do you think the greatest source of information regarding the past,present and future peformance of the company that creates the perception will come from?
I would like to hear lowerlobe's answer, but if anybody else knows, please tell!
Registered User **
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aircraft......
Sunfish and others are right.You are not here for any constructive purpose as your arguments are nonsensical at best.
Your only apparent raison d'être on PPrune is Fishing.
This is easily shown with some of your quotes.
This is a question I put to you.......
To which you initially replied.....
I then posted that I made no such implication and that any such inference was an assumption on your part.
When you reiterated your need for an answer,you posted this...
As you can see I made no such claim that you were wrong only that you made an assumption totally on your part.This means that I was referring to any board and not one in particular.
So on one hand you said it cannot be the board ( but that is not true) and then later said it must be the board because it can't be the sharemarket (he effectively said that I was wrong. So, who could it be?).
You are not here for any answer's as you contradict yourself and as a result you are here to fish and other nefarious reasons known to yourself therefore deserve no further attention....
Sunfish and others are right.You are not here for any constructive purpose as your arguments are nonsensical at best.
Your only apparent raison d'être on PPrune is Fishing.
This is easily shown with some of your quotes.
This is a question I put to you.......
Your right in that the share market makes up it's own mind but that valuation is created by PERCEPTION and INFORMATION........and who would have the ability or greatest impact on that perception and information delivery?
You are implying MJ, GD and co. have the greatest impact but that is not true.
When you reiterated your need for an answer,you posted this...
When I answered "the board and executive" he effectively said that I was wrong. So, who could it be? It can't be the sharemarket itself!
So on one hand you said it cannot be the board ( but that is not true) and then later said it must be the board because it can't be the sharemarket (he effectively said that I was wrong. So, who could it be?).
You are not here for any answer's as you contradict yourself and as a result you are here to fish and other nefarious reasons known to yourself therefore deserve no further attention....
lowerlobe,
Amazing, just amazing.
Your statements and the way you conduct debate is notably childish. This is not the first time I have thought this.
So that other posters can more fully appreciate the lunancy of lowerlobe's debating, I will reproduce here the relevent exchanges between he and I. To simplify the subject matter, I will use the September 11, 2001 hijacking instead of the original.
To see for themselves that I have stuck closely to the original exchanges, readers should refer to his post (#31) where he asked the original question, my post (#32) where I answered, then his lunatic response post to my answer (#33).
lowerlobe: A plane was hijacked by some terrorists and crashed into a building. Now who would those terrorists have been?
aircraft: You are implying Mohammed Atta and co.
lowerlobe: I made no such implication regarding anyone in particular.That is an assumption on your part. A plane was hijacked and crashed into a building. Now, who was in a position to be able to do that? Who had control of that plane?
Amazing, just amazing.
Your statements and the way you conduct debate is notably childish. This is not the first time I have thought this.
So that other posters can more fully appreciate the lunancy of lowerlobe's debating, I will reproduce here the relevent exchanges between he and I. To simplify the subject matter, I will use the September 11, 2001 hijacking instead of the original.
To see for themselves that I have stuck closely to the original exchanges, readers should refer to his post (#31) where he asked the original question, my post (#32) where I answered, then his lunatic response post to my answer (#33).
lowerlobe: A plane was hijacked by some terrorists and crashed into a building. Now who would those terrorists have been?
aircraft: You are implying Mohammed Atta and co.
lowerlobe: I made no such implication regarding anyone in particular.That is an assumption on your part. A plane was hijacked and crashed into a building. Now, who was in a position to be able to do that? Who had control of that plane?
Registered User **
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aircraft......
You cannot even get your references right!
It was post # 28 not post #31 in which I quoted you as saying ....
Note that you said 'Share market'....and 'Company'....
To which I replied.....
You then said I was implying a certain board and it's members...
I'm not sure about you as are most others who post on PPrune but i was referring generically to 'a board' just as I was referring to 'a sharemarket' and not to any board or sharemarket in particular.
Your only purpose here is to have someone post a litigous comment for your own purposes.
Your 9/11 analogy is so weak,bizarre and irrelevant that you deserve no further attention.
I suggest that you try fishing somewhere else.....
You cannot even get your references right!
It was post # 28 not post #31 in which I quoted you as saying ....
The share market makes it own mind up, independently, on what the share price should be, and that valuation will almost always be different to what the company thinks the price should be.
To which I replied.....
Your right in that the share market makes up it's own mind but that valuation is created by PERCEPTION and INFORMATION........and who would have the ability or greatest impact on that perception and information delivery?
I'm not sure about you as are most others who post on PPrune but i was referring generically to 'a board' just as I was referring to 'a sharemarket' and not to any board or sharemarket in particular.
Your only purpose here is to have someone post a litigous comment for your own purposes.
Your 9/11 analogy is so weak,bizarre and irrelevant that you deserve no further attention.
I suggest that you try fishing somewhere else.....
Nunc est bibendum
Big thank you to virgindriver. I was sure there was an ignore list somewhere but hadn't found it. Your comments allowed me to find the right place. Now I don't have to read any of aircraft's dribblings! 
