Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Emirates Bangkok to Sydney turned back to Bangkok this morning

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Emirates Bangkok to Sydney turned back to Bangkok this morning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2007, 11:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: East of Greenwich
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates Bangkok to Sydney turned back to Bangkok this morning

Anybody know what happened?
No passenger drama - no terrifying mid-air plunge.
HotPete is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2007, 15:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i am surprised emirates do bangkok-sydney????
topend3 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2007, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Daily for the last I'm not sure how many years, after they switched from SIN-SYD, also daily, for quite a few years before that.
Andu is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2007, 07:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the aircraft passed approximately FL180 the flight crew noted low engine oil pressure followed by the illumination of the EICAS warning for same. Almost immediately, this was followed by the oil low quantity EICAS. The crew actioned all the abnormal checklists which required the engine to be shut down.

BOEING 777-300 ROLLS-ROYCE ENGINES
Bypass ratio is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2007, 10:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bangkok-Sydney is normally a GE90 -300ER. Are you sure it was RR powered Bypass?
Bankstown is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2007, 17:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My apologies, yes it was a Boeing 777-300ER powered by the 115000LB GE90.

btw. I flew the 200LR the other day.......talk about lots of residual thrust!!
Bypass ratio is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 05:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the -200ER: check out the single engine ceiling, even at quite high weights. Seriously hypoxia-inducing.
MTOW is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 09:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,291
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Re the -200ER: check out the single engine ceiling, even at quite high weights. Seriously hypoxia-inducing.
As the majority of us don't have a copy of said manual, Please explain....?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 22:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Humble apologies, cap'n, but I was (and am) away from home when I posted that comment and didn't and don't have the manuals to hand so couldn't check the figures for my recollections, and I knew someone would correct me if I got it 500 feet wrong, so I was hoping someone might come up with them.

I can't remember the AUW, but it wasn't particularly light, and the SE ceiling was around (just above) 30,000 feet. Impressive, and the first time I've seen that figure as a single engine ceiling in a twin of any description.
MTOW is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.