Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Delays into Melbourne Thursday evening 25th October

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Delays into Melbourne Thursday evening 25th October

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2007, 13:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delays into Melbourne Thursday evening 25th October

Any pilots out there get delayed this evening into Melbourne? Up to, and over 30min delays, the reason……..staff shortage in the tower, with no replacement available. Thousands of people would have been affected. Me thinks it may have been tower people starting to show some ‘grip’ (refusal) to Airservices in result to their incapability to manage staffing numbers. How ironic that Richard Dudley (General Manager Corporate Affairs) was on hand in the centre to see it for himself!

If you think that was bad, wait till airspace is closed when they start reducing numbers on the nightshift to single manned. Controllers will refuse to work, a) because their fatigue will skyrocket, and b) Airservices’ way of ensuring a break is had, is to have a controller from different airspace, different stream (approach or enroute) give a 20min break! Not only is this unsafe, it down right stupid, think Uberlingen – Swiss Mid Air, and the associated findings in employing dual manned coverage. If you want to see / read more http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=296753
bloggerjck is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2007, 10:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: bagdad
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that all management whether it be airlines or atc are screwing their workers, i hope it's not only a matter of time before we have a major incident to wake these fukcers up!!!

cost cutting could eventuly kill a lot of people in this country I believe!!!!

Last edited by The Kavorka; 28th Oct 2007 at 00:08.
The Kavorka is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2007, 22:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC in Melbourne is becoming a bit of a joke- so much for AirSERVICES...
Delays are becoming almost expected. Single runway ops becoming common place. I guess we are heading back to the dark ages.
I hope the airlines are getting compensation for all the delays and extra costs this is causing. I know this cheeses the pax off- especially when I am one!

Last edited by virgindriver; 28th Oct 2007 at 12:58.
virgindriver is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2007, 23:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Just another example of the decline in vital aviation professions.

Pilot, Air Traffic Controller, Aircraft Engineer, etc... all, have had their conditions sacrificed over the years on the altar of mangement bonuses. Great for the share price, but ultimately they have been building their ivory towers on sand!

It's not too late, but they must act now. Restore wages and conditions to what they should be, retain highly skilled staff, and rebuild the desire for these professions into the future.

Continue to live on a different planet to rest of us, and you will end up dining on ashes!

Last edited by KRUSTY 34; 28th Oct 2007 at 10:57.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 00:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 58
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Melbourne delays

Virgindriver - sorry had to reply to your post! As a Melbourne ATC I have to confirm your assumption that ATC has requested strong winds thereby reducing us to single runway ops. We all find it very amusing to watch you all fly around in circles (because the company still schedules for the LAHSO rate regardless of wind conditions) then work our buts off for over 2 hours getting you all in. Please don't tell everyone though - it will be our little secret!

Krusty34 - Spot on post. Salaries in ATC seem to be on the rise internationally in responce to staff difficulties. Are the pilots/engineer offers going up??? One day (hopefully soon) the companies will pay more than lip service to staffing and start trying to fix this massive problem - hopefully before a disaster occurs.

Blue

Last edited by bluerider777; 28th Oct 2007 at 04:49.
bluerider777 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 01:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 16 ILS is also being upgraded so is out of service for a few months. The NDB minima is a fair bit higher so low cloud with certain weather conditions may require rwy 27 only rather than 16/27. I've also heard that "the airlines don't like the NDB approach". I guess there's an increase in workload.
AlJassmi is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 01:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: sydney
Age: 53
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
last thursday morning we had a 25 min delay on the ground out of Melbourne,the wind was light with 8 knots of downwind on 27,why not use 09 for either arrivals or departures,15 aircraft waiting for up to 30 mins is ridiculous-we would be better of sitting at the gate and awaiting a start clearance as opposed to wasting half a tonne of fuel.such a waste!
Parc-Ratstej is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 02:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
The 16 STARs conclude with picking up the localiser. If there is no localiser then the STARs should not be issued, at least in their presently published form. The IAF for the NDB is Bolinda. Only one STAR flies over Bolinda, the rest turn well inside of it and nobody likes NDBs.
Kelly Slater is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 02:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
hardin up slats!

As far as NDB approaches go, mel 16 is pretty straight forward! fwiw, the 'arbey' star goes takes you to the start, just doesn't have approach 'joining' instructions... easily fixed by the atco saying 'cleared NDB 16'. simple.
maggot is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 03:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On a Ship Near You
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 16 STARs conclude with picking up the localiser. If there is no localiser then the STARs should not be issued, at least in their presently published form. The IAF for the NDB is Bolinda. Only one STAR flies over Bolinda, the rest turn well inside of it and nobody likes NDBs.
Well sort of, from my understanding, because they are all RNAV STARS whilst the STAR does end with the LLZ, it's not required for navigation. So the STAR is perfectly valid to be issued when one or more of the aids mentioned on the plate are out of service.

The approach clearance may/will be different than the STAR plate depending on conditions and available aids, eg VSAs, VOR, NDB, RNAV etc. hence why they aren't integrated into the STAR plates and have their own page(s).

PS, VD, like it, I guess all these Northerly/Westerly winds (aka ASA hot air) commence just west and south of the runway intersection; sure blame the inefficient ATCs for airlines turning up 40 an hour when only 28 are landing; it's just easier that way.
SM4 Pirate is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 04:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 58
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delays on Ground Thu?

Parc - not sure of the exact conditions but Thu every week is runway(27/09) out day - for maintenance works. Regardless of the wind we are limited to 16 or 34 and many of the opportunities for departures off another runway disappear. Not sure if this was the case then though as I was off duty Thu.
bluerider777 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 08:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stralya
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One can imagine the pressure being placed on the controllers concerned.

The controllers sitting on the console are the final link in their system. Just as the pilots and engineers are on the flying side.
"mis-management" driven by bean counters, looking at numbers have successively failed to realise that revenue is not generated from financial accounts and people sitting driving desks but from the operational staff.

Driving those people's morale into the ground with an adversarial culture, cost driven policies and kpi's(for managers) have delivered a system where operational staff will push back, be they pilots, engineers or in this case controllers. It is us collectively who hold aviation together. The link is being stretched too far. It is not the regulator, it is certainly not mis-management but the guys/girls at the pointy end of the respective operations that do their best to ensure safe skies and know full well who carries the can on a badddd day!
QFinsider is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 10:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kelly Slater,
The STARs are still issued because the route and any height requirements are designed to assist in separation with other traffic.
Driscoll is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2007, 12:52
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting a bit off the topic, please, we urge all you pilots, when you do encounter TIBA or "delays due staff shortage" as we publish on the ATIS, to log it with your company. That way it can be directed to our incompetent management team.

Bare with us, we try our best, its the gooses who run the company that dont
bloggerjck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.