Air NZ raises govt ire over war charter
Thread Starter
Air NZ raises govt ire over war charter
Air NZ raises govt ire over war charter
Sponsored Links
Recent Property Sales in your area
Get paid to receive text adverts
Want more money? Search SEEK
Aug 15, 2007 3:19 PM
The government is unimpressed Air New Zealand has been involved in flying Australian troops to Kuwait for military duties in Iraq.
Defence Minister Phil Goff believes at least two charter flights were sent and he says it was done without any knowledge of the government.
He says Air New Zealand may have informed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but that information was never passed on.
Goff says the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should have briefed both their minister and Cabinet as Iraq is a sensitive policy issue and the practice is not appropriate.
The government holds a majority share in the carrier but Goff concedes that under the Companies Act the government would not have been able to direct Air New Zealand in its business.
Goff says he and other ministers will be registering their disapproval with the national carrier. The Green Party are also demanding clear guidelines to stop state agencies cooperating with the war in Iraq.
Air New Zealand, however, says its decision to fly Australian troops to Kuwait was a business one.
Spokesperson Glen Sowry says the two charter flights to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates were part of an increased focus on charter activity.
He says the new focus has added $18 million to the airlines revenue.
Sponsored Links
Recent Property Sales in your area
Get paid to receive text adverts
Want more money? Search SEEK
Aug 15, 2007 3:19 PM
The government is unimpressed Air New Zealand has been involved in flying Australian troops to Kuwait for military duties in Iraq.
Defence Minister Phil Goff believes at least two charter flights were sent and he says it was done without any knowledge of the government.
He says Air New Zealand may have informed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but that information was never passed on.
Goff says the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should have briefed both their minister and Cabinet as Iraq is a sensitive policy issue and the practice is not appropriate.
The government holds a majority share in the carrier but Goff concedes that under the Companies Act the government would not have been able to direct Air New Zealand in its business.
Goff says he and other ministers will be registering their disapproval with the national carrier. The Green Party are also demanding clear guidelines to stop state agencies cooperating with the war in Iraq.
Air New Zealand, however, says its decision to fly Australian troops to Kuwait was a business one.
Spokesperson Glen Sowry says the two charter flights to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates were part of an increased focus on charter activity.
He says the new focus has added $18 million to the airlines revenue.
Good onya Phil.
Are you going to also censure all those other New Zealand companies and individuals who have/are supplying products and services that are being used in the Iraqi conflict?
Oh, by the way, Jeanette, Sue, Keith and Co, Air NZ isn't a government agency.
Are you going to also censure all those other New Zealand companies and individuals who have/are supplying products and services that are being used in the Iraqi conflict?
Oh, by the way, Jeanette, Sue, Keith and Co, Air NZ isn't a government agency.
If the NZ Government feels that strongly about it, why not introduce a ME oil embargo?
That would raise the price of used, low kilometer Malvern Stars and Clydesdales!!
That would raise the price of used, low kilometer Malvern Stars and Clydesdales!!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Auckland
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NZ PC bullsh*t coming to the fore again!
Any of the folk involved in the actual flights like to some share some info as to the flights themselves?
I wish Hone had gone walkabout a little earlier (and got on the one of these flights instead) - perhaps then he would met some real Aussies......
Don't you Aussie fellas have those flash C17's for such occassions?
Any of the folk involved in the actual flights like to some share some info as to the flights themselves?
I wish Hone had gone walkabout a little earlier (and got on the one of these flights instead) - perhaps then he would met some real Aussies......
Don't you Aussie fellas have those flash C17's for such occassions?
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dog Box
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if the govt wants rakon to stop exporting all those nice expensive cruise missle parts to the yanks as well? Lets face it, war is good for business, and if your not on the money your not in the money. More PCBS.
Doubt that the aircraft were in a war zone, pretty sure the insurance company would have a thing or two to say about that....
Doubt that the aircraft were in a war zone, pretty sure the insurance company would have a thing or two to say about that....
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Durkadurkastan
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fact that the RAAF did not have sufficient suitable/serviceable aircraft to meet the tasking, and that a civilian charter was used in its place, is not news, it's standard operating procedure.
Air NZ aircraft are unlikely to be fitted with defensive aid suites such as chaff, flare and ECM and the pilots were unlikely to be trained in non-precision tactical approaches at night using NVGs. No, no, no - they were flying into Kuwait. Kuwait! Not bl**dy Balad or Basrah. The last time I was in Kuwait (Ali Al Salem included), not only was it safer, but the duty free was better and there were fewer insurgents than you'll find at Auckland International.
So any suggestion that the sight of a koru proudly emblazoned onto the side of an aircraft will incite a wave of truck bombings down Lambton Quay, is unfounded.
That plonker Goff can take relief in the fact that in other western democracies, airlines do not consult their governments every time there is a military charter to the Middle East. In fact, it's likely to be the other way around as the passengers and crew on BA 149 found out. <thread creep>
Could Air NZ have kept the Govt better informed? I suppose, but only as a courtesy and not for consultation as there are better people to ask about flying into Kuwait than the NZ Govt - like the Australian Govt, who actually have the stones to do something.
Rant mode off - for now.
Air NZ aircraft are unlikely to be fitted with defensive aid suites such as chaff, flare and ECM and the pilots were unlikely to be trained in non-precision tactical approaches at night using NVGs. No, no, no - they were flying into Kuwait. Kuwait! Not bl**dy Balad or Basrah. The last time I was in Kuwait (Ali Al Salem included), not only was it safer, but the duty free was better and there were fewer insurgents than you'll find at Auckland International.
So any suggestion that the sight of a koru proudly emblazoned onto the side of an aircraft will incite a wave of truck bombings down Lambton Quay, is unfounded.
That plonker Goff can take relief in the fact that in other western democracies, airlines do not consult their governments every time there is a military charter to the Middle East. In fact, it's likely to be the other way around as the passengers and crew on BA 149 found out. <thread creep>
Could Air NZ have kept the Govt better informed? I suppose, but only as a courtesy and not for consultation as there are better people to ask about flying into Kuwait than the NZ Govt - like the Australian Govt, who actually have the stones to do something.
Rant mode off - for now.
Defence Minister Phil Goff believes at least two charter flights were sent and he says it was done without any knowledge of the government.
He says Air New Zealand may have informed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but that information was never passed on.
Goff says the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should have briefed both their minister and Cabinet as Iraq is a sensitive policy issue and the practice is not appropriate.
He says Air New Zealand may have informed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but that information was never passed on.
Goff says the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should have briefed both their minister and Cabinet as Iraq is a sensitive policy issue and the practice is not appropriate.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason why Phil Goff and Helen Clark are so miffed by this is that it completely pulls the rug out from under their attack on John Key.
They had finally found, what appeared to be, a descent chink in his armour. An apparant vacillation on his position on Iraq and some inconsistent and contradictory comments in the media.
The Government was lining up to hammer him on this again this week.
The old adage holds true: A week is a long time in politics.
TK
They had finally found, what appeared to be, a descent chink in his armour. An apparant vacillation on his position on Iraq and some inconsistent and contradictory comments in the media.
The Government was lining up to hammer him on this again this week.
The old adage holds true: A week is a long time in politics.
TK
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Daghdaghistan
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they really were worried about terrorist attacks because of this charter.. they would have shut the 
up!!!!
Now every insurgent with a internet connection and Maori TV between here and Timbuktu knows now that ANZ were flying troops to Iraq and not 120 tonnes of soft pink fluffy bunnies!
Good on ya Helen and Goof......
up!!!!Now every insurgent with a internet connection and Maori TV between here and Timbuktu knows now that ANZ were flying troops to Iraq and not 120 tonnes of soft pink fluffy bunnies!
Good on ya Helen and Goof......
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: YBBN
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This particular ongoing charter work - was it originally put out to tender or was it organised through the defence travel contractor?
Maybe the contractor company x-hired another company's aircraft to fulfil the contractual needs.
I know that a ANZ 777 was used on some domestic defence charter work back around easter time to move the odd soldier or three backwards and forwards from the south to the north.
Really, the government should be just bloody grateful they have some people to send to the god forsaken joint in the first place!
Maybe the contractor company x-hired another company's aircraft to fulfil the contractual needs.
I know that a ANZ 777 was used on some domestic defence charter work back around easter time to move the odd soldier or three backwards and forwards from the south to the north.
Really, the government should be just bloody grateful they have some people to send to the god forsaken joint in the first place!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that Phil Goff, the minister of Defence, who is also the Minister of Disarmament?
How ridiculous! The managment of this country is an international joke!
How ridiculous! The managment of this country is an international joke!
Registered User **
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this is true I'd like to know why the Australian Government did not use it's own airforce or Australian carriers to do the job?
When was this supposed to happen?
the two charter flights to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates were part of an increased focus on charter activity.
He says the new focus has added $18 million to the airlines revenue.
He says the new focus has added $18 million to the airlines revenue.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Auckland
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please remember folks this is the government that thinks because we "stay out of conflict" that we will not be targeted in future acts of terrorism.
Yet last week Helen was happy to bask in the glory of our latest VC winner!
Yet last week Helen was happy to bask in the glory of our latest VC winner!
If this is true I'd like to know why the Australian Government did not use it's own airforce or Australian carriers to do the job?
and you Aussies out there.......if you laugh at the PCBS that we have in NZ.........vote Kevin Rudd and you will end up with exactly the same thing!
Helen and Phil outraged?
This begs the question, had the ADF simply bought 200 seats on an ANZ flight to an existing ANZ port (presumably to connect with another carrier that flies to Kuwait), would the NZ pollies have been "outraged"? I hardly think so.
As for Kuwait being a war zone, well for a short period back in 1990-91 yes, but not now. Guess news travels slowly to NZ!
As for Kuwait being a war zone, well for a short period back in 1990-91 yes, but not now. Guess news travels slowly to NZ!
Nunc est bibendum
If this is true I'd like to know why the Australian Government did not use it's own airforce or Australian carriers to do the job?
) then on operating an airline to transport troops between one very secure aerodrome and another. One they do very well and airlines have no ability to do, the other they probably don't do so well and the airlines do very well. As to why aussie airlines weren't used, no one except QF has the capability and I suspect that with capacity so tight at the moment that we've got nothing spare for this type of work. QF is normally very keen to get onto an ADF contract such as this given that they're a guaranteed gold mine!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere near an airport
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh for goodness sake
this from a news site
Australian troops won't fly Air New Zealand
AAP
16 August 2007
AUSTRALIAN troops will no longer fly Air New Zealand, after a row in Wellington over a "cock-up" which led to the national carrier flying soldiers to the Middle East.
The New Zealand Government, which opposes the war in Iraq, was furious when it learned the airline had carried Australian troops to the Middle East, en route to Iraq.
"In light of this controversy, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) will no longer use Air New Zealand in any circumstances," Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said today.
It was revealed yesterday that up to 600 Australian troops were taken to Kuwait by Air New Zealand in June, from where some went to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Brisbane-based Strategic Aviation was the company contracted by the Australian Defence Force (ADF) to take the troops to Kuwait, but because one of its planes was in maintenance it paid Air New Zealand to carry the soldiers.
New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and other ministers were furious that they had not been told in advance of the flights.
Defence Minister Phil Goff said the airline's actions were "contrary to the wishes and the views" of the Government, which owns 76 per cent of the carrier.
Top NZ officials today took the rap for the foreign policy error.
"This is cock-up by officials, not a conspiracy by ministers," Deputy Prime Minister Michael Cullen said today.
Mr Downer said earlier that he had received no complaints from New Zealand about the flight.
He also pointed out that the Kiwis had themselves sent troops to Iraq after the fall of Baghdad.
"This is an arrangement we have where we charter aircraft but if the New Zealand Government doesn't want us to charter Air New Zealand aircraft, that's fine," Mr Downer said.
"We'll find plenty of aircraft in the world to charter. I'm quite relaxed about it."
The ADF was not able to say how much business it did with the NZ carrier.
Executive director of Strategic Aviation Michael James said the New Zealand Government's reaction was out of all proportion to the situation.
He said the planes only flew troops from Darwin to Kuwait, and under no circumstances did they fly into war zones.
"At the end of the day, it was a commercial decision we used Air New Zealand. There were no other aircraft around that could do the job in the region," Mr James said.
He said most of the people aboard the flights went to Afghanistan, where New Zealand has sent peacekeeping troops.
"It doesn't go to military airports and it was simply two flights, doing what we do every day. At the end of the day Air New Zealand makes money," Mr James said.
Air New Zealand said New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade was aware of the flights before they took place and raised no objections.
I wonder how a lawyer may see this - government interference in a commercial transaction
Australian troops won't fly Air New Zealand
AAP
16 August 2007
AUSTRALIAN troops will no longer fly Air New Zealand, after a row in Wellington over a "cock-up" which led to the national carrier flying soldiers to the Middle East.
The New Zealand Government, which opposes the war in Iraq, was furious when it learned the airline had carried Australian troops to the Middle East, en route to Iraq.
"In light of this controversy, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) will no longer use Air New Zealand in any circumstances," Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said today.
It was revealed yesterday that up to 600 Australian troops were taken to Kuwait by Air New Zealand in June, from where some went to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Brisbane-based Strategic Aviation was the company contracted by the Australian Defence Force (ADF) to take the troops to Kuwait, but because one of its planes was in maintenance it paid Air New Zealand to carry the soldiers.
New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and other ministers were furious that they had not been told in advance of the flights.
Defence Minister Phil Goff said the airline's actions were "contrary to the wishes and the views" of the Government, which owns 76 per cent of the carrier.
Top NZ officials today took the rap for the foreign policy error.
"This is cock-up by officials, not a conspiracy by ministers," Deputy Prime Minister Michael Cullen said today.
Mr Downer said earlier that he had received no complaints from New Zealand about the flight.
He also pointed out that the Kiwis had themselves sent troops to Iraq after the fall of Baghdad.
"This is an arrangement we have where we charter aircraft but if the New Zealand Government doesn't want us to charter Air New Zealand aircraft, that's fine," Mr Downer said.
"We'll find plenty of aircraft in the world to charter. I'm quite relaxed about it."
The ADF was not able to say how much business it did with the NZ carrier.
Executive director of Strategic Aviation Michael James said the New Zealand Government's reaction was out of all proportion to the situation.
He said the planes only flew troops from Darwin to Kuwait, and under no circumstances did they fly into war zones.
"At the end of the day, it was a commercial decision we used Air New Zealand. There were no other aircraft around that could do the job in the region," Mr James said.
He said most of the people aboard the flights went to Afghanistan, where New Zealand has sent peacekeeping troops.
"It doesn't go to military airports and it was simply two flights, doing what we do every day. At the end of the day Air New Zealand makes money," Mr James said.
Air New Zealand said New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade was aware of the flights before they took place and raised no objections.
I wonder how a lawyer may see this - government interference in a commercial transaction
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder how a lawyer may see this - government interference in a commercial transaction
The Govt is the Majority ShareHolder - it Has the controlling interest in the company albeit as an SOE and although they are not Involved in the day to day operations or management of the company. Like any majority shareholder they pretty much lay down the rules albeit not directly.
The Govt is the Majority ShareHolder - it Has the controlling interest in the company albeit as an SOE and although they are not Involved in the day to day operations or management of the company. Like any majority shareholder they pretty much lay down the rules albeit not directly.
Thread Starter
If this is true I'd like to know why the Australian Government did not use it's own airforce or Australian carriers to do the job?